February 8, 200521 yr After an off season that addressed most holes on the Sox, What would you upgrade? If we are talking about utility infielder do you realize how far we have come from previous springs? I am still not sold on Contreras as anything but a #5 and I hope he proves me wrong. Health may be the only obvious thing holding us back but if we have a healthy spring I think we have as good a shot as anybody in the division.
February 8, 200521 yr QUOTE(qwerty @ Feb 8, 2005 -> 04:55 PM) I would like to upgrade our lead-off hitter. Ya, and the entire bullpen.
February 8, 200521 yr QUOTE(qwerty @ Feb 8, 2005 -> 04:55 PM) I would like to upgrade our lead-off hitter. Shouldnt that be in green.
February 8, 200521 yr QUOTE(HoosierSox @ Feb 8, 2005 -> 05:21 PM) Shouldnt that be in green. No, why would it?
February 8, 200521 yr I would upgrade the middle infield situation by bringing in someone experienced. Outfield depth is pretty good. I would also upgrade the starting pitching depth by bringing in a few more guys on invites.
February 9, 200521 yr Uprgrade the infield defense. A veteran SS/2B who fields well and hits at the top or bottom of the order. A better 3B would be good too. j/k
February 9, 200521 yr QUOTE(JimH @ Feb 8, 2005 -> 05:31 PM) I would upgrade the middle infield situation by bringing in someone experienced. Outfield depth is pretty good. I would also upgrade the starting pitching depth by bringing in a few more guys on invites. 3rd baseman
February 9, 200521 yr 3rd base but i have conifdence young crede can get it done..2nd worries me as well remember iguchi is no sure thing and weve all seen what willie can do
February 9, 200521 yr Those sound a lot more like overhaul suggestions than simply adding one more. The Sox just did an overhaul. 04 Sox SP (62W, 58L), RP (21W, 21L), 34SV 46SVO, 57H, 865 R+ 04 Min SP (59W, 46L), RP (33W, 24L), 48SV, 68SVO, 48H, 780 R+ Obvious weakness: +4 by SP vs +13 by SP. Overhaul: +Hernandez, +Vizc, +Herm 05 Sox SP: (65W, 50L) +15 beats Min rotation 05 Sox RP: (25W, 22L) +3 lags Min pen but good enough to win div. SOX RP vs RH Vizc .333O .522S .290A Adkins .327O .446S .288A Marte .341O .444S .263A Cotts .329O .399S .231A Herm .294O .358S .242A Politte .273O .312S .208A Shingo.226O .186S .150A SOX RP vs LH Politte .442O .595S .351A Adkins .397O .579S .327A Herm .354O .498S .285A Cotts .342O .519S .269A Shingo .294O .402S .215A Vizc .245O .341S .163A Marte .259O .214S .143A I think KW will be on the look out for a RP strong vs RH to bump Adkins & Cotts out of the pen. Quality or winnable start: 7th: Politte vs RH, Vizc vs LH 8th: Herm vs RH, Marte vs LH 9th: Shingo Poor start: 5th-6th: Adkins or Cotts :puke
February 9, 200521 yr QUOTE(JUGGERNAUT @ Feb 8, 2005 -> 08:56 PM) Those sound a lot more like overhaul suggestions than simply adding one more. The Sox just did an overhaul. 04 Sox SP (62W, 58L), RP (21W, 21L), 34SV 46SVO, 57H, 865 R+ 04 Min SP (59W, 46L), RP (33W, 24L), 48SV, 68SVO, 48H, 780 R+ Obvious weakness: +4 by SP vs +13 by SP. Overhaul: +Hernandez, +Vizc, +Herm 05 Sox SP: (65W, 50L) +15 beats Min rotation 05 Sox RP: (25W, 22L) +3 lags Min pen but good enough to win div. SOX RP vs RH Vizc .333O .522S .290A Adkins .327O .446S .288A Marte .341O .444S .263A Cotts .329O .399S .231A Herm .294O .358S .242A Politte .273O .312S .208A Shingo.226O .186S .150A SOX RP vs LH Politte .442O .595S .351A Adkins .397O .579S .327A Herm .354O .498S .285A Cotts .342O .519S .269A Shingo .294O .402S .215A Vizc .245O .341S .163A Marte .259O .214S .143A I think KW will be on the look out for a RP strong vs RH to bump Adkins & Cotts out of the pen. Quality or winnable start: 7th: Politte vs RH, Vizc vs LH 8th: Herm vs RH, Marte vs LH 9th: Shingo Poor start: 5th-6th: Adkins or Cotts :puke I hate you and your stupid stats. :finger
February 9, 200521 yr For those who said 3rd base, is it just Crede's bat you are unhappy with, or do you guys think he is a poor fielder?
February 9, 200521 yr QUOTE(Leonard Zelig @ Feb 8, 2005 -> 10:28 PM) For those who said 3rd base, is it just Crede's bat you are unhappy with, or do you guys think he is a poor fielder? hes not a bad fielder at all its his bat that bothers me..joe's flaw is that long swing he takes at the plate instead of a quick punch but hopefully joe has gotten that swing of his corrected this offseason and can perform the way i believe he can
February 9, 200521 yr Shortstop for sure. I am not sold on Juan Uribe and I feel he will fall into a sophomore slump. Actually, he was a bit rough the second half of last year. He is the perfect utility infielder. He's Hispanic for Craig Grabeck. Nice player, but no star.
February 9, 200521 yr QUOTE(retro1983hat @ Feb 9, 2005 -> 02:41 PM) Shortstop for sure. I am not sold on Juan Uribe and I feel he will fall into a sophomore slump. Wouldn't he have to only be in the league one full year?
February 9, 200521 yr QUOTE(qwerty @ Feb 9, 2005 -> 02:52 PM) Wouldn't he have to only be in the league one full year? Super Senior slump
February 9, 200521 yr Can we upgrade to a monkey picking names out of hat for a GM?? IMO the monkey would do a better job.
February 9, 200521 yr QUOTE(AnthraxFan93 @ Feb 9, 2005 -> 03:11 PM) Can we upgrade to a monkey picking names out of hat for a GM?? IMO the monkey would do a better job. Your posts are so insightful, Anthrax :headshake
February 9, 200521 yr I am very pleased with the job KW has done in filling holes but if I were able to add anything (dream world) it would be a star shortstop or a Curt Schilling type starting pitcher that could carry the team by shear will during the middle of the summer. Now, if we're talking reality... My guess is that we'll be looking for a veteran starting pitcher before the trade deadline because you can never have too many of those guys during a playoff run. And, secondly, we'll be looking for a backup shortstop for Uribe as I'm not convinced we have one in the entire organization.
February 9, 200521 yr QUOTE(AnthraxFan93 @ Feb 9, 2005 -> 09:11 PM) Can we upgrade to a monkey picking names out of hat for a GM?? IMO the monkey would do a better job. Apparently that monkey already has a job typing your posts.
February 9, 200521 yr QUOTE(KevHead0881 @ Feb 9, 2005 -> 02:26 PM) Apparently that monkey already has a job typing your posts.
February 9, 200521 yr QUOTE(KevHead0881 @ Feb 9, 2005 -> 03:26 PM) Apparently that monkey already has a job typing your posts.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.