March 17, 200521 yr Schilling playing politics. The steroid issue aside, anybody else think he is a douche bag?
March 17, 200521 yr QUOTE(jackie hayes @ Mar 17, 2005 -> 01:47 PM) He said he wouldn't name names, but you can't plead the 5th except to protect yourself, right? The 5th amendment is the right to not speak unless otherwise indicted.
March 17, 200521 yr QUOTE(KevHead0881 @ Mar 17, 2005 -> 01:48 PM) Schilling playing politics. The steroid issue aside, anybody else think he is a douche bag? no
March 17, 200521 yr QUOTE(jackie hayes @ Mar 17, 2005 -> 01:47 PM) He said he wouldn't name names, but you can't plead the 5th except to protect yourself, right? Exactly, it only protects you against SELF-incrimination. You have to answer about others.
March 17, 200521 yr I like Schilling. He speaks his mind on anything. You may not agree with it, but I like hearing his thoughts.
March 17, 200521 yr 5th Amendment: No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
March 17, 200521 yr QUOTE(jackie hayes @ Mar 17, 2005 -> 01:47 PM) He said he wouldn't name names, but you can't plead the 5th except to protect yourself, right? I don't think you can plead the fifth if you already answered questions, right? Eh, I could be thinking of something else...
March 17, 200521 yr QUOTE(Steff @ Mar 17, 2005 -> 01:50 PM) CSpan breaking up again.. is he s***ting on Jose also? He absolutely insinerated Canseco.
March 17, 200521 yr QUOTE(Kalapse @ Mar 17, 2005 -> 07:49 PM) 5th Amendment: No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. Right, the relevant part is the "witness against himself" part.
March 17, 200521 yr QUOTE(Steff @ Mar 17, 2005 -> 01:51 PM) 96 positive tests when...?? s***!!! For who?
March 17, 200521 yr QUOTE(Steff @ Mar 17, 2005 -> 02:50 PM) CSpan breaking up again.. is he s***ting on Jose also? He's rambling and has just endorsed/supported teh current system for testing.
March 17, 200521 yr QUOTE(Steff @ Mar 17, 2005 -> 02:51 PM) 96 positive tests when...?? s***!!! 2003, 12 last year
March 17, 200521 yr QUOTE(tonyho7476 @ Mar 17, 2005 -> 01:51 PM) He's rambling and has just endorsed/supported teh current system for testing. He said it is a better test than they had but it is not perfect.
March 17, 200521 yr QUOTE(nitetrain8601 @ Mar 17, 2005 -> 07:48 PM) I like Schilling. He speaks his mind on anything. You may not agree with it, but I like hearing his thoughts. Guess I'm alone on this one. I just think he's arrogant and irritating. Whatever.
March 17, 200521 yr Criminal case, witness against himself. They could take the 5th on this question: "During your time as a player did you ever take steriods with Mr. Canseco?" They could not take the 5th on this question: "During your time as a player, did you ever witness another player taking steriods?" The second question there is no way to incriminate themselves, therefore the judge could put them in contempt of court for not answering. SB
March 17, 200521 yr Did I just hear him say soemthing about the tobacco industry marketing to youth?? WTF is this conference about?
March 17, 200521 yr QUOTE(Soxbadger @ Mar 17, 2005 -> 07:53 PM) Criminal case, witness against himself. They could take the 5th on this question: "During your time as a player did you ever take steriods with Mr. Canseco?" They could not take the 5th on this question: "During your time as a player, did you ever witness another player taking steriods?" The second question there is no way to incriminate themselves, therefore the judge could put them in contempt of court for not answering. SB Right, that's what I was thinking. So McGuire cannot take the 5th on the basis that he may incriminate someone else.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.