daa84 Posted March 25, 2005 Share Posted March 25, 2005 at 11 am CT mlb will count down the sox top 50 prospects. you can watch teh show through mlb.com. go to whitesox.com for the details Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daa84 Posted March 25, 2005 Author Share Posted March 25, 2005 QUOTE(daa84 @ Mar 25, 2005 -> 10:15 AM) at 11 am CT mlb will count down the sox top 50 prospects. you can watch teh show through mlb.com. go to whitesox.com for the details err.. s*** i think its top overall prospects, sorry...the way it was said made it soudn like sox top prospects Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sox1422 Posted March 25, 2005 Share Posted March 25, 2005 QUOTE(daa84 @ Mar 25, 2005 -> 04:18 PM) err.. s*** i think its top overall prospects, sorry...the way it was said made it soudn like sox top prospects It will still be interesting to see where McCarthy lands on the list. His stock has definitely risen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daa84 Posted March 25, 2005 Author Share Posted March 25, 2005 QUOTE(Sox1422 @ Mar 25, 2005 -> 10:41 AM) It will still be interesting to see where McCarthy lands on the list. His stock has definitely risen. brian anderson cracks in at 38, and sweeney in surprisingly higher at 31. they seemed real high on sweeney sayin that they "guarantee he will be in the sox OF or close by next year" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JimH Posted March 25, 2005 Share Posted March 25, 2005 There are people who are more impressed with Sweeney than Anderson. Count me as one of them. I think Sweeney has the potential to make a greater impact, he's got a good eye at the plate and his arm is even better than I thought. No knock at all on Anderson but Sweeney and BMac are the top two prospects the White Sox have IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted March 25, 2005 Share Posted March 25, 2005 up to #14, still havent head BMAC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AddisonStSox Posted March 25, 2005 Share Posted March 25, 2005 QUOTE(JimH @ Mar 25, 2005 -> 11:22 AM) There are people who are more impressed with Sweeney than Anderson. Count me as one of them. I think Sweeney has the potential to make a greater impact, he's got a good eye at the plate and his arm is even better than I thought. No knock at all on Anderson but Sweeney and BMac are the top two prospects the White Sox have IMO. As a fan, I'm far more excited about Sweeney than Anderson. His defense is stellar, he has excellent range, and I absolutely his swing. It's gourgeous. I wonder though. If Podsednik finds a home on the Southside, what are we going to do with the OF. I know we have Dye through next year, Rowand through 2007 (a little help on this one please) and I'm unsure of Podsednik's contract. If you guys could help me out with those OF contracts I'd really appreciate it. If Podsednik can play anywhere close to the level he was playing in his rookie campaign, he's not going anywhere. I have to admit, I love watching him play. He's so exciting and I think his speed is going to lead to a ton of runs at the top of the order. Are we looking at an Anderson-Rowand-Sweeny OF down the road? I'm deeply vexed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted March 25, 2005 Share Posted March 25, 2005 up to number 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoodAsGould Posted March 25, 2005 Share Posted March 25, 2005 its hard to believe B-Mac would go rated so high after 1 season... i hope they didnt forget about him :banghead Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted March 25, 2005 Share Posted March 25, 2005 No BMAC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoodAsGould Posted March 25, 2005 Share Posted March 25, 2005 our top prospect doesnt make it even though Ryan Sweeney and Anderson do Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greasywheels121 Posted March 25, 2005 Share Posted March 25, 2005 (edited) Wow...Only one word can describe that: traveshamockery. Edited March 25, 2005 by greasywheels121 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammerhead johnson Posted March 25, 2005 Share Posted March 25, 2005 QUOTE(AddisonStSox @ Mar 25, 2005 -> 05:30 PM) Are we looking at an Anderson-Rowand-Sweeny OF down the road? I'm deeply vexed. One of the two probably won't work out, but if both do, I could see Anderson at 1B. Signing Konerko long-term is a bad move, IMO. How is Josh Fields, defensively? If he doesn't work out at 3B, then 1B would have to be his destination. I just can't see us locking down Konerko with the type of potential impact players that we have in our farm system. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoodAsGould Posted March 25, 2005 Share Posted March 25, 2005 actually of the two id say Brian Anderson is the more sure thing, Although Sweeney easily has the higher upside Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammerhead johnson Posted March 25, 2005 Share Posted March 25, 2005 This Top Prospect list was most likely put together before spring training? Is that a fair assumption, given the absence of one Brandon McCarthy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KevHead0881 Posted March 25, 2005 Share Posted March 25, 2005 QUOTE(hammerhead johnson @ Mar 25, 2005 -> 05:58 PM) This Top Prospect list was most likely put together before spring training? Is that a fair assumption, given the absence of one Brandon McCarthy? That would have to be the case. Although, he should have probably been on there regardless. A 21 yr old who lead the minors in strike outs is not amongst the top 100 prospects in baseball? Not much sense there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted March 25, 2005 Share Posted March 25, 2005 QUOTE(KevHead0881 @ Mar 25, 2005 -> 12:46 PM) That would have to be the case. Although, he should have probably been on there regardless. A 21 yr old who lead the minors in strike outs is not amongst the top 100 prospects in baseball? Not much sense there. I thought it was a top fifty list? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daa84 Posted March 25, 2005 Author Share Posted March 25, 2005 QUOTE(qwerty @ Mar 25, 2005 -> 01:09 PM) I thought it was a top fifty list? yeah it was top 50, and I can see why Bmac wasnt included assuming the list was made a month or so ago. i mean baseball america had both sweeney and anderson ahead of bmac too, so i think its understandable. It also seems to me that sabermetric guys like dayn perry, who rated mccarthy 14 overall, seem to rank mccarthy higher than scouts who arent blown away by mccarthys overall stuff. while mlb.com didnt pick mccarthy in the top 50, he has gotten his name mentioned plenty lately and is gettin alot of national pub. ie gammons perry baseball prospectus crasnick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quickman Posted March 25, 2005 Share Posted March 25, 2005 QUOTE(qwerty @ Mar 25, 2005 -> 07:09 PM) I thought it was a top fifty list? starting to like your pictures again, thank you very much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KevHead0881 Posted March 26, 2005 Share Posted March 26, 2005 QUOTE(qwerty @ Mar 25, 2005 -> 07:09 PM) I thought it was a top fifty list? Oops. My bad. But if it were a top 100, I'd be right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Hudler Posted March 26, 2005 Share Posted March 26, 2005 QUOTE(JimH @ Mar 25, 2005 -> 05:22 PM) There are people who are more impressed with Sweeney than Anderson. Count me as one of them. I think Sweeney has the potential to make a greater impact, he's got a good eye at the plate and his arm is even better than I thought. No knock at all on Anderson but Sweeney and BMac are the top two prospects the White Sox have IMO. Might I add that Chris Young just may have more upside than both Anderson and Sweeney? If ranking them in terms of pure upside you would rank them: 1. Young 2. Sweeney 3. Anderson If ranking them in terms of sureity of making an impact in the big leagues, you'd switch Anderson and Young and leave Sweeney in the middle. What makes Sweeney so attractive is the balance between more of a sure thing than Young, yet having a high upside. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3E8 Posted March 26, 2005 Share Posted March 26, 2005 (edited) QUOTE(Rex Hudler @ Mar 25, 2005 -> 07:18 PM) Might I add that Chris Young just may have more upside than both Anderson and Sweeney? If ranking them in terms of pure upside you would rank them: 1. Young 2. Sweeney 3. Anderson If ranking them in terms of sureity of making an impact in the big leagues, you'd switch Anderson and Young and leave Sweeney in the middle. What makes Sweeney so attractive is the balance between more of a sure thing than Young, yet having a high upside. When I was in Tucson, I got to see Young two times. He seemed very confident at the plate, and to me looked like a major league hitter. After watching him play, I've gone from knowing nothing about him, to anxiously waiting his arrival. He just has to try and be more disiplined, and cut back on the K's. Edited March 26, 2005 by 3E8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quickman Posted March 26, 2005 Share Posted March 26, 2005 QUOTE(AddisonStSox @ Mar 25, 2005 -> 05:30 PM) As a fan, I'm far more excited about Sweeney than Anderson. His defense is stellar, he has excellent range, and I absolutely his swing. It's gourgeous. I wonder though. If Podsednik finds a home on the Southside, what are we going to do with the OF. I know we have Dye through next year, Rowand through 2007 (a little help on this one please) and I'm unsure of Podsednik's contract. If you guys could help me out with those OF contracts I'd really appreciate it. If Podsednik can play anywhere close to the level he was playing in his rookie campaign, he's not going anywhere. I have to admit, I love watching him play. He's so exciting and I think his speed is going to lead to a ton of runs at the top of the order. Are we looking at an Anderson-Rowand-Sweeny OF down the road? I'm deeply vexed. Addison, we may not see any of them, 9 out of ten don't make it. one year at a time my friend, but I do think your right, Pods is probably not a long term player for us, for many reasons, he is older and will slow down, and many base stealers can get injured because they run and slide so much. Its nice to have these back ups, if not to play later then to trade later. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted March 26, 2005 Share Posted March 26, 2005 QUOTE(3E8 @ Mar 25, 2005 -> 07:35 PM) When I was in Tucson, I got to see Young two times. He seemed very confident at the plate, and to me looked like a major league hitter. After watching him play, I've gone from knowing nothing about him, to anxiously waiting his arrival. He just has to try and be more disiplined, and cut back on the K's. I keep hearing the raves about Young's tools. Could someone pick a major leaguer to compare him to, at least what his potential is? Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JimH Posted March 26, 2005 Share Posted March 26, 2005 I keep hearing the raves about Young's tools. Could someone pick a major leaguer to compare him to, at least what his potential is? Thanks <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Defintely Mike Cameron. Same build, almost exactly the same tools although Cameron's arm is better. Same propensity to go fishing for the breaking stuff, and miss. Speed, power, good instincts in the OF, great athlete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.