Buehrle>Wood Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 I expect an overwheming "no", just interested to see if anyone still thinks he's credible... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stocking Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 i do Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Queen Prawn Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 They have this on yahoo and so far No is "winning" that poll. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 First ballot hall of famer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nokona Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 First ballot? No. Â Third or Fourth? Yes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da Sox Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 I say yes because most likley Bonds is going in and even if he did use steriods, he's ruining his body in the long term for people like me to have a more enjoyable expierance watching the game. Â I say promote the use of steriods among professionals, it will make them better and make the game more entertaining. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkman delivers Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 Yes. Even with the steroids (which I hate more than most), his numbers are just sick. Not a first balloter anymore, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 Da Sox = :dips*** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 QUOTE(Buehrle>Wood @ Aug 1, 2005 -> 04:01 PM) I expect an overwheming "no", just interested to see if anyone still thinks he's credible... Â Â What are you asking...? Will be be voted in or is he credible. Two different questions with two different answers for me.. Â Can you clarify because I think people are answering only 1 of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 QUOTE(Da Sox @ Aug 1, 2005 -> 04:18 PM) I say yes because most likley Bonds is going in and even if he did use steriods, he's ruining his body in the long term for people like me to have a more enjoyable expierance watching the game. I say promote the use of steriods among professionals, it will make them better and make the game more entertaining.  Watching a guy take walks when pitches are thrown three feet of the plate because he is so juiced up that he could bunt a home run out? That is entertainment at it's best to me. I cannot believe you are actually condoning the use of steroids and think it makes the game of baseball better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosMediasBlancas Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 Saying the truth is out, implies that he juiced. Based on that, my answer is um, let's see here, gimme a minute, oh yeah: f*** NO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 If we took everyone out of the hall of fame that cheated it would be an awfully small hall of fame. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 QUOTE(qwerty @ Aug 1, 2005 -> 04:38 PM) If we took everyone out of the hall of fame that cheated it would be an awfully small hall of fame. Â Â Â Agree. He's a cheat and has no credibility as far as I'm concerned... Â But roids don't magically make you able to hit a 90+ mph fast ball or able to make many of the great plays he made over his career. He's a great player, I will give him that - the same I give to Bonds - but is he credible... hell no. Will he eventually be in the HOF.. yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosMediasBlancas Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 (edited) QUOTE(qwerty @ Aug 1, 2005 -> 04:38 PM) If we took everyone out of the hall of fame that cheated it would be an awfully small hall of fame. Â Maybe, how about ones who got caught? Suspicion and proof are two totally different things. Â Â The question is would I, I vote him in, right? NO. Will he eventually get in? Probably. Edited August 1, 2005 by LosMediasBlancas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukeNukeEm Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 (edited) Im suprised at you guys...  Shoeless Joe Jackson supposedly threw a WS.. banned from baseball  Pete Rose gambled on games as a manager.. banned from baseball  Rafeal Palmeiro TESTED POSITIVELY for Steroids.. 10 game suspension.  Excuse me? But Palemiero deserves to live his life the same way Shoeless Joe and Pete rose did. In agony. Knowing he will never be where he always wants to.  f*** Palmiero.  f*** the Cheaters. Edited August 1, 2005 by DukeNukeEm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoSox05 Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 no i wouldnt vote for this cheat. You know who i would vote for though. The Big Hurt. Â guys like Palmerio should get this next to there stats ******* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosMediasBlancas Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 .........You forgot about Pete Rose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 QUOTE(LosMediasBlancas @ Aug 1, 2005 -> 04:52 PM) .........You forgot about Pete Rose. Â Â Â I'd put Rose in the HOF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukeNukeEm Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 .........You forgot about Pete Rose. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Â Oh dont get me f***ing started. Â Him being banned is hte biggest bulls*** ever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kev211 Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 No doubt pete rose should be in the hall Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kev211 Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 Going on what duke said... Â Whats worse gambling on baseball or using steriods. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yoda Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 Doesn’t Palmeiro have a son? What a good example he’s showing. :headshake Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFanForever Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 Raffy needs pills for stamina and pills to get a boner. I kinda feel bad for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Critic Posted August 2, 2005 Share Posted August 2, 2005 The only 'roid guy I see this hurting as far as the HOF is concerned is McGwire. I think he was seen as one-dimensional anyway, and when that one dimension is thrown into question then many people can easily justify not voting him in. Palmeiro is still one of only 4 guys to get 3,000+/500+ and he will probably get to 3,000+/600+. Hard numbers to ignore, even with a steroid suspension. If he gets another, however.....that could be a different story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Critic Posted August 2, 2005 Share Posted August 2, 2005 QUOTE(Steff @ Aug 1, 2005 -> 03:54 PM) I'd put Rose in the HOF. So would I. You get more hits than anyone in the history of your game, you get into the Hall Of Fame, especially when you were caught cheating post-playing career. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.