January 15, 200620 yr Someone's going to say "you don't b**** when the sox get the same types of breaks" To that person i say: The refs were able to use video replay to reverse that call. During the sox game, they didn't have that luxury and it was human error on those calls.
January 15, 200620 yr QUOTE(IlliniKrush @ Jan 15, 2006 -> 03:05 PM) Someone's going to say "you don't b**** when the sox get the same types of breaks" To that person i say: The refs were able to use video replay to reverse that call. During the sox game, they didn't have that luxury and it was human error on those calls. And still nobody knows if that ball hit the ground or not. This was as obvious as it gets. Edited January 15, 200620 yr by Rowand44
January 15, 200620 yr QUOTE(IlliniKrush @ Jan 15, 2006 -> 03:05 PM) Someone's going to say "you don't b**** when the sox get the same types of breaks" To that person i say: The refs were able to use video replay to reverse that call. During the sox game, they didn't have that luxury and it was human error on those calls. That's the key right there. To have access to every camera angle available, at any speed you ask for, and still make that call is ridiculous. I guess that's the "home field advantage" we hear so much about? EDITED to say that I really hope Pittsburgh hangs on, so that call doesn't decide anything. Edited January 15, 200620 yr by The Critic
January 15, 200620 yr Author QUOTE(NUKE_CLEVELAND @ Jan 15, 2006 -> 03:01 PM) You have integrity. I respect that. I thought us democrats didn't have integrity.
January 15, 200620 yr Pittsburgh ABSOLUTELY was the better team out there today. No doubt about it. And yes, I'm a Colts fan.
January 16, 200620 yr QUOTE(Mplssoxfan @ Jan 16, 2006 -> 03:47 PM) NFL made it official (like anyone who was watching didn't already know). I'm glad they did this, but they almost had to it was that bad of a call.
January 16, 200620 yr At least that bad call didn't change the outcome of the game. Had it done so that would have tainted anything Peyton had been able to accomplish going forward............which would have been getting stomped on by Denver.
January 16, 200620 yr QUOTE(NUKE_CLEVELAND @ Jan 16, 2006 -> 05:17 PM) At least that bad call didn't change the outcome of the game. Had it done so that would have tainted anything Peyton had been able to accomplish going forward............which would have been getting stomped on by Denver. Which is all hypothetical; however, Indy would have loved to play Denver. Indy beat Denver 41-10 in the '04 playoffs, and 49-24 in the '05 playoffs.
January 16, 200620 yr Porter felt the refs were cheating them. http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs05/n...tory?id=2294214
January 16, 200620 yr QUOTE(Milkman delivers @ Jan 16, 2006 -> 10:54 PM) Porter felt the refs were cheating them. http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs05/n...tory?id=2294214 its funny because when i was watching the game i said if they overturn this call the game is fixed, so i do think something fishy is going on
January 16, 200620 yr QUOTE(soxhawks @ Jan 16, 2006 -> 05:14 PM) its funny because when i was watching the game i said if they overturn this call the game is fixed, so i do think something fishy is going on I thought so too.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.