January 19, 200620 yr QUOTE(LosMediasBlancas @ Jan 19, 2006 -> 02:41 PM) He could tell me I'm smart or that he likes my eyes, or take me to dinner 1st, you know, soemthing to get me excited about the project. ya know, i really think you two would make a cute couple.
January 19, 200620 yr QUOTE(Reddy @ Jan 19, 2006 -> 03:12 PM) ya know, i really think you two would make a cute couple. on the down low.
January 19, 200620 yr Reduce the month long slumps, that's basically it. If he can minimize the damage so to speak when he's slumping then he'll be fine.
January 20, 200620 yr Author Alot of interesting answers. I agree he tends to go into some horrable monthly slumps. I would like to see him reduce those. All players flucuate in their level at some point in the year, but to have fewer below-par dropoffs, and less severe ones is the keys, and more of those hot periods too. I was just wondering if they take the fact he gets fewer games and fewer at bats into account when looking at his HRs and RBIs into account. Also I hear alot of negativity around him, that unless he drasticaly improves he will be gone after this year, and the fact he was signed to only a 1-year contract at not too high a salary(I thought it might be around 3 million)is a sign of that too I would have thought. I am Canadian so I have no choice but to follow the Toronto Blue Jays alot, and we would have killed to have had a 3rd baseman that hit 22 homers in only 432 at bats, and along with Rodriguez and 1 or 2 others played the best defence of any 3rd baseman in the league, and who peaks for key games. That is why I am a bit surprised whenever I read critical articles of him coming from Chicago, but then again now that Chicago are the World Series Champions their standards probably go far up.
January 20, 200620 yr QUOTE(crazyman26 @ Jan 20, 2006 -> 11:15 AM) Alot of interesting answers. I agree he tends to go into some horrable monthly slumps. I would like to see him reduce those. All players flucuate in their level at some point in the year, but to have fewer below-par dropoffs, and less severe ones is the keys, and more of those hot periods too. I was just wondering if they take the fact he gets fewer games and fewer at bats into account when looking at his HRs and RBIs into account. Also I hear alot of negativity around him, that unless he drasticaly improves he will be gone after this year, and the fact he was signed to only a 1-year contract at not too high a salary(I thought it might be around 3 million)is a sign of that too I would have thought. I am Canadian so I have no choice but to follow the Toronto Blue Jays alot, and we would have killed to have had a 3rd baseman that hit 22 homers in only 432 at bats, and along with Rodriguez and 1 or 2 others played the best defence of any 3rd baseman in the league, and who peaks for key games. That is why I am a bit surprised whenever I read critical articles of him coming from Chicago, but then again now that Chicago are the World Series Champions their standards probably go far up. Lots of it is that many teams have a whipping boy. There is that one player that always seems to be the target of everyone's ire. For a long time Joe Crede was it for the Sox. PLus there were big expectations for him coming out of the minors as a two time MVP of his respective leagues, and that makes people harder on him as well.
January 20, 200620 yr QUOTE(kyyle23 @ Jan 19, 2006 -> 12:27 PM) well, Im glad that was in green. me too (seriously, thank god)
January 20, 200620 yr QUOTE(sox-r-us @ Jan 19, 2006 -> 07:45 PM) TRADE FOR VINNY FOCKING CASTILLA wasnt there people screaming for that terrible trade ages ago?? thank god your suggestion is in green as well. :puke edit: it wasnt. i hope you arent serious. Edited January 20, 200620 yr by samclemens
January 20, 200620 yr QUOTE(samclemens @ Jan 20, 2006 -> 05:01 PM) wasnt there people screaming for that terrible trade ages ago?? thank god your suggestion is in green as well. :puke edit: it wasnt. i hope you arent serious. I wasn't serious. This was an inside joke from last year
January 20, 200620 yr Author Lots of it is that many teams have a whipping boy. There is that one player that always seems to be the target of everyone's ire. For a long time Joe Crede was it for the Sox. PLus there were big expectations for him coming out of the minors as a two time MVP of his respective leagues, and that makes people harder on him as well. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Good point. Then again also feel thankful since our whipping boy in Toronto was Eric Hinske, who would you rather have, Joe Crede or Erik Hinske?
January 21, 200620 yr QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Jan 20, 2006 -> 11:54 AM) many teams have a whipping boy. There is that one player that always seems to be the target of everyone's ire. For a long time Joe Crede was it for the Sox. I don't know about this. I think this year's (deserved) whipping boy was Marte...and actually I can think of a couple of others whom fans lacerated on a regular basis. Remember, Billy Koch before that? Ouch! Let's not remember him.
January 21, 200620 yr QUOTE(kevin57 @ Jan 20, 2006 -> 07:09 PM) I don't know about this. I think this year's (deserved) whipping boy was Marte...and actually I can think of a couple of others whom fans lacerated on a regular basis. Remember, Billy Koch before that? Ouch! Let's not remember him. Jerome Dead comes to mind.
January 21, 200620 yr Author It will be interesting to see if he stay healthy enough to start 140-145 games this year, something he didnt do last year. I do think Josh Fields will replace him as the starting 3rd baseman next year though. It will be interesting if they try to send Crede to the minors next year, taking the risk he wont clear waivers since he will be 28, try to trade him, dont take the salary arb. making him a free agent, or just use him as a utility infielder next year?
January 21, 200620 yr QUOTE(kevin57 @ Jan 20, 2006 -> 08:09 PM) I don't know about this. I think this year's (deserved) whipping boy was Marte...and actually I can think of a couple of others whom fans lacerated on a regular basis. Remember, Billy Koch before that? Ouch! Let's not remember him. QUOTE(TLAK @ Jan 20, 2006 -> 08:15 PM) Jerome Dead comes to mind. Lots of guys have their turns. Heck I remember when everyone hated Aaron Rowand and thought he should be traded for batting practice baseballs... Same with Jon Garland (aka Judy to the impatient) Boy would last year have not been nearly as much fun if we had dumped them for the nothing that some were saying we should.
January 22, 200620 yr QUOTE(crazyman26 @ Jan 21, 2006 -> 12:04 PM) It will be interesting to see if he stay healthy enough to start 140-145 games this year, something he didnt do last year. I do think Josh Fields will replace him as the starting 3rd baseman next year though. It will be interesting if they try to send Crede to the minors next year, taking the risk he wont clear waivers since he will be 28, try to trade him, dont take the salary arb. making him a free agent, or just use him as a utility infielder next year? I think Joe managed to get through the back problem well enough and keep playing (although August was pretty bad)...the main reason he missed time last year though was that freak injury when he was plunked on the hand, and you can'tr eally blame himf or that. Joe Crede will not be going to the minors next year...and I for 1 will be surprised if Fields is ready to come up and start in 07, I think he may well need at least a decent portion of 07 in AAA before his swing and defense are where we'd like them.
January 22, 200620 yr Author In any case if Fields is ready to come up to the big leagues before the end of the 08 season, do you think they try to send Crede to the minors hoping he clears waivers, or they let him go off and be a free agent since they still own his rights until then?
January 22, 200620 yr QUOTE(crazyman26 @ Jan 22, 2006 -> 09:31 AM) In any case if Fields is ready to come up to the big leagues before the end of the 08 season, do you think they try to send Crede to the minors hoping he clears waivers, or they let him go off and be a free agent since they still own his rights until then? Crede aint going to the minors, you can take that to the bank.
January 22, 200620 yr Author Crede aint going to the minors, you can take that to the bank. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I agree as long as they can find another team that needs a starting 3rd baseman in 2 or 3 years(whenever Fields replaces him), or he can be converted to a utility infielder if that team does not have an opening at 3rd base. The good news for him as a free agent he would make MUCH more money than he does right now, especialy as a starting 3rd baseman on another team.
January 22, 200620 yr QUOTE(crazyman26 @ Jan 22, 2006 -> 10:38 AM) I agree as long as they can find another team that needs a starting 3rd baseman in 2 or 3 years(whenever Fields replaces him), or he can be converted to a utility infielder if that team does not have an opening at 3rd base. The good news for him as a free agent he would make MUCH more money than he does right now, especialy as a starting 3rd baseman on another team. Utility infielder? Crede is a third baseman, thats all. the guy is slow, he doesnt have the range to be a 2B or SS, and the Sox are set at 1st. Crede is probably out of options to the minors, so it isnt even an issue. He is either going to get traded, sign another deal, or leave via free agency. There will be no sending him down, converting him, none of that nonsense.
January 22, 200620 yr Author I bet he will not be signed either after 2006 or 2007, not sure which year.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.