May 8, 200619 yr QUOTE(Dick Allen @ May 8, 2006 -> 04:10 PM) What are the chances that if Contreras was out for a prolonged period, that McCarthy goes into the rotation and Haeger goes to the bullpen? With his knuckler, he'd be able to go multiple innings, and be able to pitch more often than just about anyone on the staff. If Contreras was going to be out for more than 2 starts, I think they'd immediately be getting BMac ready to go back into a starting role, simply because he showed he could swing it last year. But since they think it'll be a short stint, they're gonna run with Charlie, so that BMac doesn't throw off his routine. At least, that's the only thing that makes sense to me.
May 8, 200619 yr QUOTE(Balta1701 @ May 8, 2006 -> 05:15 PM) If Contreras was going to be out for more than 2 starts, I think they'd immediately be getting BMac ready to go back into a starting role, simply because he showed he could swing it last year. But since they think it'll be a short stint, they're gonna run with Charlie, so that BMac doesn't throw off his routine. At least, that's the only thing that makes sense to me. That sounds about right. Let's just pray it's only a couple starts he misses.
May 8, 200619 yr Ahh, and now I see a 17 page on Haeger.... Somebody hit me over the head, I was looking for a Contreras on DL type headline. Sigh... it must be Monday.
May 8, 200619 yr QUOTE(Jordan4life_2006 @ May 8, 2006 -> 04:16 PM) That sounds about right. Let's just pray it's only a couple starts he misses. If he had to miss more than a couple, I'm pretty damn happy with Brandon getting to throw a full few games.
May 8, 200619 yr QUOTE(Balta1701 @ May 8, 2006 -> 05:17 PM) If he had to miss more than a couple, I'm pretty damn happy with Brandon getting to throw a full few games. I'm not. Our bullpen is suspect enough right now.
May 8, 200619 yr QUOTE(jackie hayes @ May 8, 2006 -> 03:14 PM) So what's the scouting report on Haeger? He throws 90?, 95?, what? Haeger throws the knuckler (obviously), a mid to upper 80's fastball, and an ocassional slider. Also, here's an image of him pitching (you can see it on our story at FutureSox, but if this works right, it will also show up in the post).
May 8, 200619 yr QUOTE(Chisoxfn @ May 8, 2006 -> 07:18 PM) Haeger throws the knuckler (obviously), a mid to upper 80's fastball, and an ocassional slider. Also, here's an image of him pitching (you can see it on our story at FutureSox, but if this works right, it will also show up in the post). Huh. That's pretty hard for a knuckleballer.
May 8, 200619 yr QUOTE(jackie hayes @ May 8, 2006 -> 03:20 PM) Huh. That's pretty hard for a knuckleballer. Ya, which is why I think many in the org are intrigued with his potential. He wasn't originally a knuckler, than again most pitchers aren't, but Haeger retired from the club and than started working on a knuckler (in fact I think a coach tried to help him with it) and than he came back and boy did he come back. I believe that is Haegs story at least.
May 8, 200619 yr honestly I am pretty pumped to see what this guy can do even if it does mean losing a game or two.
May 8, 200619 yr I think Haegs would be up right away to allow either AJ or the Widge to work on catching him.....
May 8, 200619 yr QUOTE(Elcaballo45 @ May 8, 2006 -> 11:16 PM) Ahh, and now I see a 17 page on Haeger.... Somebody hit me over the head, I was looking for a Contreras on DL type headline. Sigh... it must be Monday. It happens to the best of us.
May 8, 200619 yr QUOTE(jackie hayes @ May 8, 2006 -> 11:14 PM) So what's the scouting report on Haeger? He throws 90?, 95?, what? Another freaking Sox pitching prospect who can't get his fastball into the 90s
May 8, 200619 yr QUOTE(soxhawks @ May 8, 2006 -> 05:23 PM) honestly I am pretty pumped to see what this guy can do even if it does mean losing a game or two. Ok, I just can't resist...why? Are we going for moral victories here? Or, maybe where wins and losses don't count like little league?
May 8, 200619 yr QUOTE(AddisonStSox @ May 8, 2006 -> 06:25 PM) Ok, I just can't resist...why? Are we going for moral victories here? Or, maybe where wins and losses don't count like little league? Whose bringing the Capri Suns and Orange wedges?
May 8, 200619 yr QUOTE(soxhawks @ May 8, 2006 -> 11:23 PM) honestly I am pretty pumped to see what this guy can do even if it does mean losing a game or two. Yeah....I remember having the same feeling when we called Scott Ruffcorn up.
May 8, 200619 yr QUOTE(kyyle23 @ May 8, 2006 -> 05:26 PM) Whose bringing the Capri Suns and Orange wedges? Orange wedges at half time...YES!
May 8, 200619 yr QUOTE(Chisoxfn @ May 8, 2006 -> 06:22 PM) Ya, which is why I think many in the org are intrigued with his potential. He wasn't originally a knuckler, than again most pitchers aren't, but Haeger retired from the club and than started working on a knuckler (in fact I think a coach tried to help him with it) and than he came back and boy did he come back. I believe that is Haegs story at least. Didn't he get roughed up a bit this spring, and then they had Charlie Hough work with him a bit? He's been as good as you can be at Charlotte, and was pretty good his last spring training outing.
May 8, 200619 yr Well, if it makes anybody feel better, here are the AL offensive rankings for the Angels: Average=11th Home Runs=11th Runs=12th So atleast Haeger won't be going up against an offensive juggernaut. Just try not to let that Vlad guy beat you.
May 8, 200619 yr QUOTE(Dick Allen @ May 8, 2006 -> 06:27 PM) Didn't he get roughed up a bit this spring, and then they had Charlie Hough work with him a bit? He's been as good as you can be at Charlotte, and was pretty good his last spring training outing. I bet Hough could come in and still pitch 5 innings. That guy never threw fast as it was, his age didnt matter
May 8, 200619 yr QUOTE(Jordan4life_2006 @ May 8, 2006 -> 06:27 PM) Well, if it makes anybody feel better, here are the AL offensive rankings for the Angels: Average=11th Home Runs=11th Runs=12th So atleast Haeger won't be going up against an offensive juggernaut. Just try not to let that Vlad guy beat you. And sox-killer Darin Erstad just went on the DL
May 8, 200619 yr QUOTE(Dick Allen @ May 8, 2006 -> 05:27 PM) Didn't he get roughed up a bit this spring, and then they had Charlie Hough work with him a bit? He's been as good as you can be at Charlotte, and was pretty good his last spring training outing. Charlie also ran into some s*** luck in ST though. A lot of balls were falling, guys were comitting errors, etc... Maybe someone can explain better than I. Even when Widger was in the booth with Hawk, he said, "Charlie is wearing it right now." So, those numbers may have been a bit misleading...but, I didn't like what I saw from him regardless.
May 8, 200619 yr I'm a little encouraged by the fact that they're saying 15 day DL and retroactive to the 4th. It makes it sound less serious to me.
May 8, 200619 yr QUOTE(Dick Allen @ May 8, 2006 -> 03:27 PM) Didn't he get roughed up a bit this spring, and then they had Charlie Hough work with him a bit? He's been as good as you can be at Charlotte, and was pretty good his last spring training outing. He was hammered in the spring, but finished things off with a really nice outing against the Braves. I think theyd id bring in Hough, but not positive with that.
May 8, 200619 yr QUOTE(AddisonStSox @ May 8, 2006 -> 04:25 PM) Ok, I just can't resist...why? Are we going for moral victories here? Or, maybe where wins and losses don't count like little league? Because he's been shredding teams in the minors this season, and because it'd be damn nice to develop another starting pitcher who makes $400k a year and is with the Sox for a decade. At least that's my thinking.
May 8, 200619 yr QUOTE(AddisonStSox @ May 8, 2006 -> 05:25 PM) Ok, I just can't resist...why? Are we going for moral victories here? Or, maybe where wins and losses don't count like little league? Addy, I realize you're upset, but this isn't the kiss of death to our season. Calm down, buddy.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.