Rack. Them. Up. b****.

wow, just checked gameday and saw that our 1-4 hitters have a grand total of 0 hits, with 5 strikeouts

Pronks havin major troubles early on this season, prolly because Vmart is not hitting behind him due to the early injury.

 

Cha 51

Chi 61

 

Bulls officially get lottery pick, Knicks lost bumping them out of contention.

Edited April 14, 200718 yr by ChWRoCk2

chat link?

Yah. That ball was cuttin hard at the last second.

 

He played it nicely, and it was still a tough catch. A poor outfielder, like Mackowiak, would have completely whiffed on that.

Look at the speed by Pods.

Anderson should have been hitting for Pods, then playing LF in the 9th. Or else, why the hell is Anderson on the roster?

Let's go Darin.

Pods better stay close.

Shoppoch showed some good D this week Pods, be careful.

Anderson should have been hitting for Pods, then playing LF in the 9th. Or else, why the hell is Anderson on the roster?

 

Nah, you let Pods hit, but now you replace him in the bottom of the 9th.

but now you replace him in the bottom of the 9th.

Bet you he doesn't.

Shoppoch showed some good D this week Pods, be careful.

 

My thoughts exactly. I've love to see more hit-and-runs. If there's one thing Erstad is good at, it's hitting grounders.

Nah, you let Pods hit, but now you replace him in the bottom of the 9th.

 

... at the very minimum, you should do this.

Erstad grinds out the fielder's choice.

Terrible call....time for a Thome homer.

I'm sick of hearing these Cleveland announcers b**** about calls.

Eject him, idk how close these calls are but the Indians radio announcers are saying they're getting hosed.

ba would've caught it with his hat.

 

or would he have corralled it to the top if his ring finger and had it spin around like a global trotter spinning a basketball.

Bet you he doesn't.

 

I would imagine if he didn't do it on Tuesday, he's probably not going to do it tonight.

Erstad was out but the first base ump is trying to excite the crowd.

I would imagine if he didn't do it on Tuesday, he's probably not going to do it tonight.

Exactly, I see no reason why Ozzie would make a defensive substitution in the bottom of the 9th, there's no precedent.

Exactly, I see no reason why Ozzie would make a defensive substitution in the bottom of the 9th, there's no precedent.

 

I'm not saying that. I'm just saying if he didn't do it the other night, he probably won't do it tonight. Not that he should or shouldn't. Maybe he'll surprise us tho. I wouldn't count on it.

I would imagine if he didn't do it on Tuesday, he's probably not going to do it tonight.

 

I think he might have learned his lesson though. He had no problem doing it last year.

yay Pablo's in.