November 14, 200718 yr QUOTE(max power @ Nov 13, 2007 -> 07:25 PM) Uh, its a little soon to say sweeney missed the boat, daily herald schmuck. In terms of starting in CF for the White Sox in April of 08, no it isn't.
November 14, 200718 yr Obviously. I wasn't aware he was seriously considered a candidate in that context, having been injured all year. I mean, he didn't "miss the boat" this year or at all yet. There was no boat this year. Edited November 14, 200718 yr by max power
November 14, 200718 yr I like Crisp in LF and Hunter in CF if possible. Pretty good defensive outfield...
November 14, 200718 yr Just curious, but if the Sox get Hunter and have a LF of one (or two) of Owens/Stewart/Crisp, that would be an all black OF. Now, when was the last time Chicago had an all black OF?
November 14, 200718 yr QUOTE(BearSox @ Nov 14, 2007 -> 03:49 AM) Just curious, but if the Sox get Hunter and have a LF of one (or two) of Owens/Stewart/Crisp, that would be an all black OF. Now, when was the last time Chicago had an all black OF? I actually thought about that as well, and I don't know the answer to that, but I remember Dye being the only one on the team for a while.
November 14, 200718 yr QUOTE(Kalapse @ Nov 12, 2007 -> 10:30 PM) I want Fukudome damn it. Me too. He's cheaper then hunter and fulfills a need of a guy who can get on base and not strike out a lot. I'm surprised the Sox aren't pushing harder for him. Bob
November 14, 200718 yr QUOTE(gosox41 @ Nov 13, 2007 -> 08:23 PM) Me too. He's cheaper then hunter and fulfills a need of a guy who can get on base and not strike out a lot. I'm surprised the Sox aren't pushing harder for him. Bob Well, there's always the question...how do we know they're not? He didn't declare as a FA until yesterday either, so no one could really negotiate with him until now. And I think pretty much everything with him has been speculation so far.
November 14, 200718 yr For his part, Rowand said he's merely enjoying his vacation at an undisclosed tropical spot, and that he hasn't begun considering offers. The Texas Rangers, Washington Nationals, Chicago White Sox, St. Louis Cardinals and San Diego Padres have contacted him. Didn't see this posted anywhere else... Link
November 14, 200718 yr QUOTE(BearSox @ Nov 13, 2007 -> 10:49 PM) Just curious, but if the Sox get Hunter and have a LF of one (or two) of Owens/Stewart/Crisp, that would be an all black OF. Now, when was the last time Chicago had an all black OF? Since the 80's 1995: Tim Raines, Lance Johnson, Mike Devereaux 1994: Raines, Johnson, Bo Jackson 1993: Raines, Johnson, Ellis Burkes 1981: Ron Leflore, Chet Lemon, Harold Baines
November 14, 200718 yr QUOTE(BearSox @ Nov 13, 2007 -> 09:49 PM) Just curious, but if the Sox get Hunter and have a LF of one (or two) of Owens/Stewart/Crisp, that would be an all black OF. Now, when was the last time Chicago had an all black OF? I don't mean this in a negative way towards you, but really, what difference does it make?
November 14, 200718 yr QUOTE(YASNY @ Nov 14, 2007 -> 09:29 AM) I don't mean this in a negative way towards you, but really, what difference does it make? Its interesting considering the studies and press revolving around the lack of black players in baseball today.
November 14, 200718 yr QUOTE(RockRaines @ Nov 14, 2007 -> 09:30 AM) Its interesting considering the studies and press revolving around the lack of black players in baseball today. I had that thought in mind when I asked the question.
November 15, 200718 yr QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Nov 13, 2007 -> 10:35 PM) Well, there's always the question...how do we know they're not? He didn't declare as a FA until yesterday either, so no one could really negotiate with him until now. And I think pretty much everything with him has been speculation so far. Well hopefully they're going after him and hard. Worst case is drive the price up for the Cubs who are the likely frontrunners. Best case is we found our lead off hitter and LFer. Go dump Contreras, trade Garland for a good CFer and good reliever and sign the Japanese reliever and I'd feel a lot more comfortable about this team. Bob
November 15, 200718 yr QUOTE(YASNY @ Nov 14, 2007 -> 09:29 AM) I don't mean this in a negative way towards you, but really, what difference does it make? what RockRaines said...
November 15, 200718 yr QUOTE(YASNY @ Nov 14, 2007 -> 09:29 AM) I don't mean this in a negative way towards you, but really, what difference does it make? Thank you Yas. Seriously.
November 15, 200718 yr QUOTE(BearSox @ Nov 14, 2007 -> 10:43 PM) what RockRaines said... With the lack of black ballplayers in MLB these days, that makes it seem like a moot point. You saw my response to Rock. Your remark could be interpretted as a backhanded slap at the Sox because they haven 't had a completely black outfield for several years. I was hoping that wasn't the case and that you'd clarify.
November 15, 200718 yr QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Nov 13, 2007 -> 07:19 AM) When was the last time the Sox were outwardly looking to spend huge dollars on a FA? Its been a while. It will be more interesting what the under the radar moves are... Bingo! I have total faith that Hunter will be running around center field at the Cell next season. I just think it is a very low chance it will be in a White Sox uniform.
November 16, 200718 yr Once we get our CF be it Hunter, Fukodome, Jones, or whatever the next rumor is, I wouldn't mind signing Lofton to play left for next year. He is still very solid offensively and would give us a lead off man. Defensively he has slipped so he shouldnt be an option in CF anymore. Theres always the possibilty that a trade for Furcal and Pierre (not preferable) gets made as well as soon as the Dodgers sign Rowand.
November 16, 200718 yr QUOTE(IowaSoxFan @ Nov 16, 2007 -> 02:55 PM) Once we get our CF be it Hunter, Fukodome, Jones, or whatever the next rumor is, I wouldn't mind signing Lofton to play left for next year. He is still very solid offensively and would give us a lead off man. Defensively he has slipped so he shouldnt be an option in CF anymore. Theres always the possibilty that a trade for Furcal and Pierre (not preferable) gets made as well as soon as the Dodgers sign Rowand. You want to trade for Pierre, why exactly. He makes lots of money, and is a bad bad baseball player. So bad in fact, that one year after he signed a deal with the Dodgers, they are looking to sign another CF to replace him. I would rather have Owens out in CF than that.
November 18, 200718 yr I don't want Pierre but I've heard nothing of them wanting to deal him either...All I have seen is him being moved to left b/c the CF market this year is better. I have seen lots of stuff on Kemp being dealt. Nothing on Pierre though.
November 18, 200718 yr If the Dodgers move Kemp, they better be getting something crazy in return or I think the folks in LA are gonna stab Coletti to death.
November 18, 200718 yr No doubt but as far as I know, their intentions are nothing less then acquiring the best player available. Johan seems to be their guy. I don't ever hear anything about their vets going. All I ever hear is how they want a different guy @ 3rd. Why when you can play LaRoche? Or how they want a new OF, and want to deal Kemp cuz of his "clubhouse" issues. Move Billingsley and Broxton, or Kershaw. It's like...Why??? I just don't understand it but if someone can find me a Juan Pierre trade rumor, I'd like to see it. All I have seen is the Dodgers having intentions of moving him to LF. Just weird out of them. I guess they really want to win now.
November 18, 200718 yr It's sounding like LA's first choice is Rowand, and his agent is meeting with the team. Rowand left a good impression on Torre from that wild game in the bronx where he was catching everything hit his way.
November 18, 200718 yr if the dodgers get rownd they means Pierre is definitely done with them. As for us going after Pierre, I'd pass, unless the Dodgers are picking up a huge chunk of his contract.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.