Rowand44 Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 We got a scouting report on McMillen? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 I'm going to guess that the Sox take a SS/2B with the next pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jun 7, 2011 -> 01:02 PM) I don't think so save for Soptic. Â I wouldn't expect you to like any of our picks, really. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 QUOTE (JoeCoolMan24 @ Jun 7, 2011 -> 01:03 PM) I wouldn't expect you to like any of our picks, really. Â ^ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox_Sonix Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jun 7, 2011 -> 02:02 PM) I don't think so save for Soptic. Â What's wrong with McMillen at 141? That's 50 slots below his projection. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 QUOTE (JoeCoolMan24 @ Jun 7, 2011 -> 12:03 PM) I wouldn't expect you to like any of our picks, really. To be fair, the 2nd rd pick does seem kinda meh. But the other 2 seem like good risks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted June 7, 2011 Author Share Posted June 7, 2011 QUOTE (ChiSox_Sonix @ Jun 7, 2011 -> 01:04 PM) What's wrong with McMillen at 141? That's 50 slots below his projection. Â Ramirez is the better prospect. But I guarantee you he'll cost more so we ran. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirtySox Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 Â Kevin_Goldstein Kevin Goldstein Left last start after six batters, sitting in mid-80s. RT @NFA_Brian: @Kevin_Goldstein what's up with Osich? 1 minute ago Favorite Retweet Reply Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantl916 Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Jun 7, 2011 -> 11:05 AM) To be fair, the 2nd rd pick does seem kinda meh. But the other 2 seem like good risks.  Not that it matters, but Keith Law had Johnson #50 overall in his rankings, which in Law valuation means he was a value. Baseball is one of the hardest to project and just from looking at BA, Law's, and other rankings it really comes down to what characteristics you value most... I think with these pitchers we've taken thus far we've shown that we're at least beyond the years of drafting lance broadways and kyle mcollough's (good stats iffy stuff...) which is a solid progression. cant be upset with the pitcher picks thus far for sure, its about as good as we could hope to do with the assumed budget contraints considered   Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox_Sonix Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jun 7, 2011 -> 02:07 PM) Ramirez is the better prospect. But I guarantee you he'll cost more so we ran. Â Ok that's fine, but that doesnt detract from the fact that we appeared to have still gotten good value from that spot. It's one thing to knock the decision of him over someone else, but he was specifically pointing to the player selected, and according to BA that is a good pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 QUOTE (DirtySox @ Jun 7, 2011 -> 10:43 AM) I wonder why Noe Ramirez is still available? He isn't a sexy pick but I'd really like him. My guess is some of his injuries also could have scared teams off. Very solid pitcher and at worse case I think he profiles as a nice lefty reliever, although I think he has a shot at making it as a starter. Glad to see him nabbed though. Loved watching him at Fullerton. Â So far I like our day 2 picks. Some solid upside and I like Johnson. I saw him pitch once and he has good life on that slider and a good fastball. Plus, the one thing the Sox have done a good job of in there system is taking guys with control issues and help develping them. Our minor leagues have a pretty good reputation at developing and working with pitchers and helping them repeat there delivery. In fact, I've only heard very very good things about the vast majority of our pitching coaches in the minor league system. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flavum Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 Too many dudes named Taylor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flavum Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 Somebody get the Sox war room a new phone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 (edited) White Sox select LHP, Scott Snodgress, Stanford Edited June 7, 2011 by JoeCoolMan24 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flavum Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 (edited) LHP- Scott Snodgress, Stanford  http://www.gostanford.com/sports/m-basebl/...ss_scott00.html  Lots of walks. Edited June 7, 2011 by flavum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted June 7, 2011 Author Share Posted June 7, 2011 I was so expecting them to take Ozney. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantl916 Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 anybody have scouting reports on Mcmillen and/or Snodgress? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danman31 Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Jun 7, 2011 -> 01:15 PM) So far I like our day 2 picks. Some solid upside and I like Johnson. I saw him pitch once and he has good life on that slider and a good fastball. Plus, the one thing the Sox have done a good job of in there system is taking guys with control issues and help develping them. Our minor leagues have a pretty good reputation at developing and working with pitchers and helping them repeat there delivery. In fact, I've only heard very very good things about the vast majority of our pitching coaches in the minor league system. I didn't care for the Johnson pick, but I agree about the Sox doing well in terms of getting guys to repeat their delivery. When I see guys that struggle with that in a scouting report, I get excited. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 Well, Snodgress surely didn't have very good numbers at all 2009-2010. Â http://thebaseballcube.com/profile.asp?P=scott-snodgress Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 QUOTE (Fantl916 @ Jun 7, 2011 -> 01:27 PM) anybody have scouting reports on Mcmillen and/or Snodgress? Â FutureSox has a report up on McMillen. Haven't see anything for Snodgrass yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted June 7, 2011 Author Share Posted June 7, 2011 QUOTE (Fantl916 @ Jun 7, 2011 -> 01:27 PM) anybody have scouting reports on Mcmillen and/or Snodgress? Â You can't find anything on mlb.com about any of our picks. You've got to google them to get any info. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 QUOTE (danman31 @ Jun 7, 2011 -> 11:27 AM) I didn't care for the Johnson pick, but I agree about the Sox doing well in terms of getting guys to repeat their delivery. When I see guys that struggle with that in a scouting report, I get excited. I don't like the combination of the two relief prospect picks. Seems short sighted. Individually I don't have a problem with the players but in the deepest pitching draft in eon's we are taking safe college relievers. Haven't they learned there lessons with all of the failed college relievers they have taken in the past. Â Again, don't mind the players, don't like our draft strategy here, thus far. Liked our 3rd rounder more than this guy (even though he is a value pick). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 @conorglassey: The White Sox were linked to #Stanford LHP Scott Snodgress with pick 47. Getting him in the 5th round makes more sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty34 Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jun 7, 2011 -> 01:29 PM) You can't find anything on mlb.com about any of our picks. You've got to google them to get any info. Â Search term: "Signability not an issue" :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted June 7, 2011 Author Share Posted June 7, 2011 OK, I've never heard of Snograg or whatever. But his college stats suck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.