July 18, 201114 yr Charlotte http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/st...ox&did=milb Birmingham http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/st...jaxaax_biraax_1 Winston-Salem http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/st...wswafa_kinafa_1 Kannapolis http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/st...ox&did=milb Bristol http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/st...brirok_elirok_1 Great Falls http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/st...orerok_grfrok_1 Edited July 19, 201114 yr by flavum
July 18, 201114 yr Man, early game. I don't understand why the Sox move so slowly with these older guys like Shoemaker. I can understand with young guys taking it slow, but with a 24-year-old in Low-A? Come on. He needs to move to High-A.
July 19, 201114 yr Only a few games, but Phegley holding his own in AAA so far. My AAP Remenowsky putting up unusual numbers for him. 1:1 K:BB ratio, striking out less than a guy an inning... but, hitters aren't hitting him either. I wonder if they have him working on something that is changing his approach, or if the hitters are that different, or what.
July 19, 201114 yr QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Jul 18, 2011 -> 10:52 PM) Only a few games, but Phegley holding his own in AAA so far. My AAP Remenowsky putting up unusual numbers for him. 1:1 K:BB ratio, striking out less than a guy an inning... but, hitters aren't hitting him either. I wonder if they have him working on something that is changing his approach, or if the hitters are that different, or what. I wish Phegley was actually a decent catcher. By all accounts he's pretty awful behind the plate.
July 19, 201114 yr Addison Reed is having an amazing Hudson-like fast-track year. Gotta think the Sox will bring him up in September. Edited July 19, 201114 yr by scenario
July 19, 201114 yr QUOTE (scenario @ Jul 18, 2011 -> 11:45 PM) Addison Reed is having an amazing Hudson-like fast-track year. Gotta think the Sox will bring him up in September. A lot different cause Reed is a reliever but ya, he'll be up in the bigs in no time.
July 19, 201114 yr And the one positive about Reed coming so fast is that it heads off ANY possibility KW will deal Viciedo for a rental "top-notch veteran RH reliever" to complement Crain/Bruney the last 2 months.
July 19, 201114 yr QUOTE (DirtySox @ Jul 19, 2011 -> 12:38 AM) I wish Phegley was actually a decent catcher. By all accounts he's pretty awful behind the plate. No he's not. He did well from what I saw of him. The only concern would be passed balls, but that's easy to work on. The pitchers seem to like his game calling.
July 19, 201114 yr QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Jul 19, 2011 -> 02:10 AM) A lot different cause Reed is a reliever but ya, he'll be up in the bigs in no time. Bothered by this though...I'd have said the same about Infante last year.
July 19, 201114 yr QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jul 19, 2011 -> 08:23 AM) Bothered by this though...I'd have said the same about Infante last year. I don't see any similarities between them, other than they are relievers. Different pitchers, different histories, different movement through the system.
July 19, 201114 yr QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Jul 19, 2011 -> 09:28 AM) I don't see any similarities between them, other than they are relievers. Different pitchers, different histories, different movement through the system. I feel like we have a history of guys getting to the AAA level, stalling/struggling when they first get called up, then winding up having success with other franchises.
July 19, 201114 yr QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jul 19, 2011 -> 08:23 AM) Bothered by this though...I'd have said the same about Infante last year. Infante came out of no where. Reed has been talked about since he was drafted.
July 19, 201114 yr QUOTE (JPN366 @ Jul 19, 2011 -> 01:35 AM) No he's not. He did well from what I saw of him. The only concern would be passed balls, but that's easy to work on. The pitchers seem to like his game calling. I haven't heard many scouts that think Phegley will be able to remain at catcher. His defense has been the knock since drafted. Though of course it doesn't really matter if he continues to not hit.
July 19, 201114 yr QUOTE (DirtySox @ Jul 19, 2011 -> 09:02 AM) I haven't heard many scouts that think Phegley will be able to remain at catcher. His defense has been the knock since drafted. Though of course it doesn't really matter if he continues to not hit. I don't know much about Sabermetrics, but even I know you don't live and die by scouting info this day and age. Did you just completely ignore what I wrote? I'll make it more simple...pitchers like throwing to him, he calls a good game. I have watched him play a lot and I haven't been overly concerned about what I saw. Edited July 19, 201114 yr by JPN366
July 19, 201114 yr QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Jul 19, 2011 -> 08:28 AM) I don't see any similarities between them, other than they are relievers. Different pitchers, different histories, different movement through the system. Agreed. Not really comparable. Reed has much better control... and as a result is putting up some sick numbers.
July 19, 201114 yr QUOTE (JPN366 @ Jul 19, 2011 -> 12:27 PM) I don't know much about Sabermetrics, but even I know you don't live and die by scouting info this day and age. Did you just completely ignore what I wrote? I'll make it more simple...pitchers like throwing to him, he calls a good game. I have watched him play a lot and I haven't been overly concerned about what I saw. I certainly read what you wrote. I just don't put much stock in it. Generalized statements such as "pitchers like throwing to him" do not negate his defensive faults. Edited July 19, 201114 yr by DirtySox
July 19, 201114 yr QUOTE (scenario @ Jul 19, 2011 -> 11:27 AM) Agreed. Not really comparable. Reed has much better control... and as a result is putting up some sick numbers. Reed's studliness really should circumvent any crazy trade for a RH reliever. He's on a rocket, and might get here before September even. And if he's not perfect right off the bat, well, hopefully we learned a lesson from last year's evaluation of Huddy. I'd guess that the info that puts us in the mix for HBell, etc. is a few weeks old, and began before the pen really solidified for us.
July 19, 201114 yr QUOTE (DirtySox @ Jul 19, 2011 -> 12:34 PM) I certainly read what you wrote. I just don't put much stock in it. Generalized statements such as "pitchers like throwing to him" do not negate his defensive faults. It matters to the organization. Teams want a catcher who works well with pitchers, that's what most important from the catching position. Edited July 19, 201114 yr by JPN366
July 19, 201114 yr QUOTE (JPN366 @ Jul 19, 2011 -> 12:27 PM) I don't know much about Sabermetrics, but even I know you don't live and die by scouting info this day and age. Did you just completely ignore what I wrote? I'll make it more simple...pitchers like throwing to him, he calls a good game. I have watched him play a lot and I haven't been overly concerned about what I saw. You also thought dayan would stay at 3rd base if he got glasses. sorry, ill take a profession scouts opinion.
July 19, 201114 yr QUOTE (shlammajamma @ Jul 19, 2011 -> 01:00 PM) You also thought dayan would stay at 3rd base if he got glasses. sorry, ill take a profession scouts opinion. I didn't think he'd do well as an outfielder, but I was wrong. I also said corrective lenses, and he may be wearing contact lenses. Of course, his bat is his biggest draw, so his position is irrelevant. Edited July 19, 201114 yr by JPN366
July 19, 201114 yr I simply drew the obvious conclusion from seeing a guy have trouble catching flyballs in the infield. Didn't exactly scream future adequate outfielder with good vision. He never made any boneheaded errors at third.
July 19, 201114 yr Fyi, JPN has seen these guys play on a daily basis. The people writing the scouting reports come down for a weekend series if that and make that statement, most of it just restating what they knew about the kid from the draft than what they actually see with their eyes.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.