Jump to content

Frank Thomas Is a Hall of Famer


southsider2k5
 Share

Recommended Posts

QUOTE (Harry Chappas @ Dec 2, 2013 -> 05:20 PM)
Morris should get in before Mussina.

 

Mussina had more wins, less losses, a lower ERA, a better K/9, a better WHIP, lower BB/9, etc, all while pitching in a MUCH higher offensive era. Mussina ranked in the Top 10 for Cy Young 9 times, vs Morris's 5. Both were 5 time all stars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 684
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'd love to be there to see Frank inducted. When that happens it will be one of my all-time happiest White Sox moments.

Would you believe I drove through Cooperstown once and didn't go to the Baseball Hall of Fame?! It was in the summer of 1974 and I was on my way (the scenic route) to see my brother who was stationed at the naval base in Groton, CT. That's a gorgeous area but I didn't have time to stop, though I sure wanted to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 2, 2013 -> 05:54 PM)
Mussina had more wins, less losses, a lower ERA, a better K/9, a better WHIP, lower BB/9, etc, all while pitching in a MUCH higher offensive era. Mussina ranked in the Top 10 for Cy Young 9 times, vs Morris's 5. Both were 5 time all stars.

Sorry but I think morris post season success puts him in front of mussina. Did mussina ever win a post season game?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Harry Chappas @ Dec 3, 2013 -> 12:20 AM)
Sorry but I think morris post season success puts him in front of mussina. Did mussina ever win a post season game?

 

Uhhhh, yeah. 7 of them.

 

He was 7-8 with a 3.42 ERA, 9.34 K/9, 2.12 BB/9, 4.41 K/BB in 139 IP

 

In other words, he was pretty good in the postseason.

 

Morris was 7-4 with a 3.80 ERA, 6.24 K/9, 3.12 BB/9, 2 K/BB in 92 IP

 

Sooo......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jack Morris doesn't get enough credit for the innings he logged. Naysayers want to dismiss him as some league average starter, which is crazy.

 

Show me the other pitchers during 1979-1992 that averaged 7.28 innings per start...while averaging 241 innings a year.

 

He was unique to his era. When I take into consideration innings pitched, winning teams and being the ace on those teams, and the time frame in which he pitched, the Hall wouldn't be lesser with him in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (flavum @ Dec 3, 2013 -> 11:07 AM)
Jack Morris doesn't get enough credit for the innings he logged. Naysayers want to dismiss him as some league average starter, which is crazy.

 

Show me the other pitchers during 1979-1992 that averaged 7.28 innings per start...while averaging 241 innings a year.

 

He was unique to his era. When I take into consideration innings pitched, winning teams and being the ace on those teams, and the time frame in which he pitched, the Hall wouldn't be lesser with him in it.

 

Averaging 7.3 IP in that era wasn't a big deal. There wasn't the 6/7/8/9 bullpen set up like we see today. Teams had closers, and maybe a set up man. He led the league once in IP, and was in the top 3 a few other times. The thing is averaging a bunch of innings doesn't make you a HOFer, at least not in my book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 3, 2013 -> 11:12 AM)
Averaging 7.3 IP in that era wasn't a big deal. There wasn't the 6/7/8/9 bullpen set up like we see today. Teams had closers, and maybe a set up man. He led the league once in IP, and was in the top 3 a few other times. The thing is averaging a bunch of innings doesn't make you a HOFer, at least not in my book.

 

I suppose we could find out what the average IP start was from 1979-1992, but the question was--who else during that time matched his durability? Nobody.

 

And I'm not saying people are wrong for not thinking he's a Hall of Famer, but the dismissal of him being a slightly better than average pitcher is garbage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (flavum @ Dec 3, 2013 -> 11:21 AM)
I suppose we could find out what the average IP start was from 1979-1992, but the question was--who else during that time matched his durability? Nobody.

 

And I'm not saying people are wrong for not thinking he's a Hall of Famer, but the dismissal of him being a slightly better than average pitcher is garbage.

 

Looking a the all time IP leaders, he is #49, and was passed by many of that era.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I view Morris like Terry Bradshaw. Products of a very good systems that were then able to shine because of the situation in which they were placed.

 

Again just my opinion so there is no need to pull out nine million stats to prove that Terry Bradshaw was the greatest quarterback to walk the earth, it is just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1979-1992, the average AL start was 6.23 innings. Jack Morris averaged an inning more than that...over 14 seasons.

 

Again, I'm not saying somebody is wrong for thinking he's not a HOF. There were better pitchers than him in shorter bursts. But the guy was way durable in his specific era, and did some things in the game that were special.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (flavum @ Dec 3, 2013 -> 12:10 PM)
1979-1992, the average AL start was 6.23 innings. Jack Morris averaged an inning more than that...over 14 seasons.

 

Again, I'm not saying somebody is wrong for thinking he's not a HOF. There were better pitchers than him in shorter bursts. But the guy was way durable in his specific era, and did some things in the game that were special.

 

Not arguing the point, because it's your call, but I think a valid comparison to Morris is Buehrle. Do you believe Buehrle is a Hall of Famer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Dec 3, 2013 -> 12:17 PM)
Not arguing the point, because it's your call, but I think a valid comparison to Morris is Buehrle. Do you believe Buehrle is a Hall of Famer?

 

If Buehrle would have continued innings-wise what he did 2001-2005, and maybe added some more postseason success, plus keep going 5-6 more years, I think he would have had a good case. I remember saying if Buehrle did in his 30's what he did in his 20's, then he's got a hell of a chance at the Hall. Unfortunately, he's backed down on innings, and hasn't done anything in the postseason of note since 2005.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because I was curious.....Frank hit .366 for his career against Mussina; .458 OBP. Against Clemens, .267, .384 OBP. Against Morris .333, .529 OBP.

Some other interesting ones: against Bartolo Colon .483, .605 OBP. Johan Santana .476, .577 OBP. Greg Maddux (4 plate appearances) .000, .250 OBP. Tom Glavine (3 plate appearances) 1.000; a single and two BBs.

Just for fun: Scott Linebrink 1 plate appearance....a solo HR.

Bruce "Cy" Chen 2 plate appearances .000 (of course).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (BigEdWalsh @ Dec 3, 2013 -> 12:44 PM)
Just because I was curious.....Frank hit .366 for his career against Mussina; .458 OBP. Against Clemens, .267, .384 OBP. Against Morris .333, .529 OBP.

Some other interesting ones: against Bartolo Colon .483, .605 OBP. Johan Santana .476, .577 OBP. Greg Maddux (4 plate appearances) .000, .250 OBP. Tom Glavine (3 plate appearances) 1.000; a single and two BBs.

Just for fun: Scott Linebrink 1 plate appearance....a solo HR.

Bruce "Cy" Chen 2 plate appearances .000 (of course).

 

Stealing this for twitter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no real issues with Morris. He was a hell of a pitcher, but there is a big difference between being a hell of a pitcher and a Hall of Famer. I wouldn't have any real issue if he did get inducted as he wouldn't be the worst Hall of Famer, but where does the watering down of the Hall of Fame stop? In recent years they've inducted guys like Rice, Dawson, Sutter and Santo. None of which I would consider Hall of Famers. I've read that something like 1 in 100 MLB players is worthy of the Hall of Fame. In a way that means that a player would have to be one of the top 7 or 8 players in baseball for the majority of their career. Guys like Morris would probably not rank in the top 7 or 8 players in baseball for even one season, let alone long to enough to be considered one of the top 1% of all players to ever play. Sorry for the rant, but I just have really high standards of who I consider to be Hall of Famers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (lasttriptotulsa @ Dec 3, 2013 -> 01:12 PM)
I have no real issues with Morris. He was a hell of a pitcher, but there is a big difference between being a hell of a pitcher and a Hall of Famer. I wouldn't have any real issue if he did get inducted as he wouldn't be the worst Hall of Famer, but where does the watering down of the Hall of Fame stop? In recent years they've inducted guys like Rice, Dawson, Sutter and Santo. None of which I would consider Hall of Famers. I've read that something like 1 in 100 MLB players is worthy of the Hall of Fame. In a way that means that a player would have to be one of the top 7 or 8 players in baseball for the majority of their career. Guys like Morris would probably not rank in the top 7 or 8 players in baseball for even one season, let alone long to enough to be considered one of the top 1% of all players to ever play. Sorry for the rant, but I just have really high standards of who I consider to be Hall of Famers.

 

I agree with you in theory, though I would disagree on Sutter. The guy pretty much created the modern bullpen with his closing ability. He is a sure fire HOFer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (BigEdWalsh @ Dec 2, 2013 -> 07:05 PM)
Would you believe I drove through Cooperstown once and didn't go to the Baseball Hall of Fame?!

 

I did the same thing. We were returning from Acadia National Park and I decided I really wasn't interested. I will when Thomas is elected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If for some reason Frank does NOT get elected on the 1st ballot I may go to Cooperstown and get arrested for disrupting the induction ceremonies.

 

Frank is most definitely getting in on the first ballot, but he's going to receive a vote total that is closer to the 75% minimum required than the 100% he deserves.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...