Soxbadger

QUOTE (RZZZA @ Oct 15, 2012 -> 10:20 PM) I dont post on realgm, I just read it. I actually know a lot about the NBA, I just put on an act for you guys because you're fun to troll also, that icon makes you all look like the same person Dont quit your day job then.

QUOTE (RZZZA @ Oct 15, 2012 -> 10:09 PM) I don't come here for insightful basketball discussion any way, I can go to realgm for that. They have higher standards. I come here for entertainment. And to argue about nothing. If you represent the knowledge of RealGM, then that board must be think that NBA2k is real life. I just traded Boozer for Dwight Howard, wooooooooo. I turned salary cap off cause Im awesome. woooo

QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Oct 15, 2012 -> 10:13 PM) I'm better than D-Rose right now. False.

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. To be serious, if Obama wins and Republicans want to riot, be my guest. Every day I hope that the welfare states (for a list see http://taxfoundation.org/blog/why-do-some-...ing-not-others) leave, because I am tired of all the free hand outs. Ironically a good porton Romney's electoral votes will come from freeloaders who I subsidize.

QUOTE (mr_genius @ Oct 15, 2012 -> 07:14 PM) me too. not giving up my Obama phone without a battle. They are just strict constructionists. According to Jefferson: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1531520/posts Im sure right now Scalia is on board with a revolution. Its 200 years late.

http://news.yahoo.com/romney-wont-face-vie...s-politics.html Romney afraid of tv show The View, yet strong enough to be our President. Just another flip to add to his flop list. (This is a joke obviously.)

Both sides already complaining about moderator. Guess that is a good way to set up your explanation for why your respective candidate lost.

That argument is as old as time. I only veto if it seems to be collusion, others in my league argue that you should veto as a weapon.

It always sucks to go through something bad. I was with someone for almost 5 years, lived with them for 3. At first I could never imagine a day when I wouldnt want to talk to her or see her etc. That was over 5 years ago, we barely speak now. As bad as it was then, just one day you wake up and it isnt so bad anymore.

My uneducated answer is because the bench mob is the name for the players who arent starters, and Deng as a starter is therefore not included.

Every player plays with a bench player at one time. By your definition Lebron is the best bench player.

It depends on the rules, but in some zombie universes they can starve.

QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Oct 15, 2012 -> 11:27 AM) That just makes me hate the writing on the show even more. And if that's the case, wouldn't they make it a priority to check those zombies just to be sure they're dead? Also, my wife and I couldn't remember - was there an explanation for why the zombies don't just "die" from lack of food? Do they need any (wasn't that the point of them moving out of the city into the country)? Could they conceivably just continue on for the next 100 years? Or can the humans realistically try and wait them out? I dont believe they have explained the rules for whether the zombies can starve. And the writing is fine if they are suggesting this is the first time they ran into a sleeper and thus they had no reason to worry.

Had a good week in my leagues, I played it safe with RGIII as I have the Green/Dalton combo anyways. Picked up TB for match up defense. Next week Im thinking the Browns could be a good call.

So it seems like external sd cards are having trouble in SGIII phones. Ive tried to 32gb class 10 and neither have worked. Ill update if I figure out the issue.

I think it can go either way. I would assume the theory is that if the bad blood doesnt mix with the good blood than he wont turn. Thus if you severe the leg quick enough he could potentially live. Everything else comes second. Rick was in desperation mode.

Little bit of an exaggeration on that play, but looks like the Cowboys have a chance to win.

QUOTE (HickoryHuskers @ Oct 14, 2012 -> 01:22 PM) Refs had different angles than the cameras. At least one of them saw a knee on the ground. The ref who signaled was the sideline ref. We get that camera angle. With super slow motion and zoom you cant see his knees, let alone from the sidelines. He blew it.

QUOTE (HickoryHuskers @ Oct 14, 2012 -> 01:20 PM) You're still assuming that he wasn't down. You can't see his knees. That is the point. How could the refs call him down when they cant see his knees? You cant just guess that the player is down.

QUOTE (fathom @ Oct 14, 2012 -> 01:17 PM) The fact they didn't review it was the most puzzling call of the game, as I pointed out as soon as it happened. That's a play you see reviewed 100% of the time. I almost thought they werent going to review the 4th down play. It didnt seem immediate.

Why throw when you scored running the ball in? How would they know the refs would make up a call on 4th down. Eventhough he was never down game over! Nothing to see here folks! I cant really fault Stanford when the runner scored, hell they possibly scored on 2 out of 4 downs. Why would they not run?

Im not even upset. Just dont call people whiners for accurately pointing out that the refs won that game.

lol I have no problem with refs missing 50/50 calls, I just find it humorous that you cant admit ND got the benefit. Everyone but you is wrong here.

QUOTE (HickoryHuskers @ Oct 14, 2012 -> 12:52 PM) I was taught to tackle with my feet on the ground and my head up, not flying through the air with my head down. He led with his helmet and he hit the guy in the head. He happened to barely miss a head to head his but that's almost impossible to tell at full speed. I still haven't seen a replay of the last play that 100% determines that neither knee touched the ground before he crossed the line. So you admit you can lead with your helmet, so that cant be a penalty. And flying through the air, also not illegal and barely missing, again not a penalty. The refs messed up, but the last play they got to look at replay, and there is no angle that shows him down. Not 1 angle.

Im wondering if you have ever played football before. Because the way you are taught to tackle is to put your helmet through the persons chest. Leading with your helmet is not a per se penalty, which is why it was so clear there was no penalty. In that situation they would have had to have deemed that either 1) helmet to helmet or 2) he used his helmet as a weapon. Neither happened, terrible call. The end of the game was far worse though, with the benefit of replay no excuse for that call.