qwerty

QUOTE(SoxFan101 @ Jan 19, 2005 -> 08:21 PM) its just dumb to have Duhon who cant shoot worth a damn... and piatkowski who is a bench player at best in the game at this point of it... i dont care how bad Gordon has played during the game he is our 4th quarter hero guy he needs to be in there. Duhon is the bulls best passer and penetrator on the team. That is my guess why.

This game was far from a given like some believed.

This whole game is back and forth back and forth.

QUOTE(3E8 @ Jan 19, 2005 -> 07:54 PM) Who's playing well for us tonight? Curry, duhon, and chandler.

QUOTE(SoxFan101 @ Jan 19, 2005 -> 07:48 PM) is it just me or the bulls like to play it close in every game... with the exception of two. That is what happens when you are one of the worst scoring teams in the league.

The bulls were up by nine about two minutes ago. Now they are up by only two.

QUOTE(WHarris1 @ Jan 19, 2005 -> 07:10 PM) They are called FREE throws for a f***ing reason. Hit them. Pisses me off more than anything.

QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Jan 19, 2005 -> 07:02 PM) LMAO, Skiles with a tech. Ad, was in the paint for a second and a half. That was complete and utter bulls*** Manute.

QUOTE(Brian @ Jan 19, 2005 -> 06:51 PM) Damn, Boston b****es and moans more than any team I have seen. Pierce crying, Rivers crying. Anyone notice Paul Pierce has the profile of a horse? He is crying because he is use to everything getting called a foul. The rest of the celtics have picked up the slack, foul wise.

Deng just faked the s*** out of pierce for the easy lay-up.

QUOTE(chi-guy2 @ Jan 19, 2005 -> 05:38 PM) in case you didnt remember guys, the bulls had a five days rest during the holidays, came back and played milwaukee and were rusty and we lost the celtics may be rusty also, not getting some game action for FIVE DAYS!!!! Mark my word, streak will live, and if not we have the lousy hawks I think that we win also. But you have to remember that they will be at home which they play very well at.

QUOTE(chi-guy2 @ Jan 19, 2005 -> 05:42 PM) every guy on the sixers wants to hog the ball, sprewell garnett, cassell, they have too many playmakers, they need a guy who will pass the ball around, the bulls have that in duhon and hinrich which is why were better, plus we can shoot downlow On the timberwolves. Also, it is not that cassel and sprewell just want to shoot. They are both top of the line cancer.

From espn.

QUOTE(AddisonStSox @ Jan 19, 2005 -> 11:24 AM) For those of you worried about Maggs signing with the Crybabies from the Northside...rest assured, he will not. I believe one of the teams most interested at this point, will eventually ink him to a one year deal. I like Punch's idea of Maggs to the Marlins. Right now, we're looking at: Houston, Texas, Detroit, Baltimore, Florida Marlins fans seem to believe he is the back-up option if they do not get delgado.

QUOTE(SoxFan101 @ Jan 19, 2005 -> 03:28 PM) lol never gurantee a celtics victory.... a team that is in the worse division in basketball and doesnt have a .500 record... if its the spurs you gurantee the streak ends... but not the lousy celtics. I don't care if you are playing against the hornets. If they have five days rest to your one, they have the advantage.

QUOTE(JUGGERNAUT @ Jan 19, 2005 -> 12:36 PM) Compare Marte's 03 vs 04 appearances & it's really 3 bad gms out of 72 that inflated Marte's ERA in 04. You are acting like practically every other relief pitcher does not have two or three bad innings that inflate their era's. You can't just say that those outings never happened and pretend their era is lower.

QUOTE(Man Of Steel @ Jan 18, 2005 -> 11:13 PM) qwerty + man of steel = .....uhhhhhh...... i meant the head banging one.... really Best. Avatar. Evar.

QUOTE(jackie hayes @ Jan 18, 2005 -> 11:58 PM) Eh, still worth a shot. Especially considering what he was still able to do while it was total junk. For the min? On the 60-day dl? I'd do it in a heartbeat, at least unless the team doctors tell me otherwise. I agree, months ago i said the sox should look into this.

QUOTE(santo=dorf @ Jan 18, 2005 -> 11:46 PM) Now calm down. He said "only once all season long." I was joking with him for one, and for two i misread it.

QUOTE(santo=dorf @ Jan 18, 2005 -> 11:42 PM) Even for the 5th starter on ANY team in the MLB? I know Garland is capable of putting up better numbers than those, but the Sox would've killed for someone who could go 6IP and give up only 4 ER back in 1996, 2003, or 2004. Six era? No thank you. It would have been an improvement from what we have been getting out of the fifth spot. But that still does nto make it o.k. or good.

QUOTE(santo=dorf @ Jan 18, 2005 -> 11:39 PM) I'm only judging Contreras from how he played with the Sox. So in 2004 both Garland and Contreras had 9 s***ty outings. How does that favor Garland? And if Garland din't have a s***ty outing, he would go 6 IP, 4 ER, which isn't bad for a 5th starter, but isn't good for a guy who has been handed the #3 spot in the rotation for 3 consecutive years. Six innings and four earned runs is bad for anyone.

QUOTE(jackie hayes @ Jan 18, 2005 -> 11:35 PM) Can someone tell me why he seems so far gone? I just haven't read anything like that. I believe this is already his second tommy john surgery.

QUOTE(Man Of Steel @ Jan 18, 2005 -> 11:33 PM) that was more than 8 last time I looked, but I did fail Algebra and Contreras pitched a few good games, as did Jon, but Contreras was horrible for a while there, at least Jon was consistant.. Shh...

QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Jan 18, 2005 -> 11:29 PM) Of course Contreras only pitched with the Sox for a couple of months, unlike Garland who pitched for us for the whole season. And I'm sure Contreras' bad starts gave up more runs than Garland's, who only gave up more than 8 runs once all season long I think. You are horrible. :headshake He gave up ten runs against the phillies on june 9th.