Everything posted by fathom
-
White Sox Loser
QUOTE(Dick Allen @ Aug 10, 2006 -> 04:05 AM) If the starter has given up 3 homers, and you are going to take him out if he gives up a hit, and its the 7th inning, why bother waiting for the runner to reach? The thing is Ozzie most likely had given up on the game by that point. Well, the PFB told me that it's not a problem that Buehrle allowed 3 homers, since they were all solo.
-
White Sox Loser
QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Aug 10, 2006 -> 04:06 AM) If KW wants to get bmac in the rotation he needs to trade one of our starters. If we mosey into next year with what we have, bmac will be in the bullpen again for the year. Another year towards arbitration down the toliet. Either Buehrle, Garland, Vazquez, Garcia, or McCarthy won't be on the Sox next year. We can all pray it's Garcia that's not here. I'd take my chances with Contreras, Buehrle, Garland, Vazquez, and McCarthy.
-
White Sox Loser
QUOTE(Felix @ Aug 10, 2006 -> 04:04 AM) Because he wants to try and get out of it preserving the bullpen. I see your point, and I tentitively agree, but I can't blame Ozzie for trying to save his bullpen in the middle of this stretch without a day off. Also, keep in mind the score at the time. I understand that you play to win every game, but if you have a chance to save the bullpen an arm so they could be used the next day when the score is closer and your team has a better chance at winning, you might want to take it. I mean seriously, who wants to waste arms during a blowout? If it's a blowout, why not pull Garland after 6 innings, and get him a little more rest. We're going to need a strong Garland the rest of the way a lot more than a strong Riske (who hasn't pitched much at all). If Ozzie was going to use Riske for 2 and MacDougal for 1 tonight, then he should have just let Riske start the inning. Great news! Papelboner just blew a save, and KC beats Boston 5-4.
-
White Sox Loser
QUOTE(ceffa2000 @ Aug 10, 2006 -> 04:02 AM) Its so disheartening for our 2-6 guys to do their job and get on base. Then to know that the next 4 guys are rallys killers waiting to happen. Once in a blue moon you can get something out of them offensively. At least BA can hold his own in CF usually. We're a 5 man offense. If Thome, PK, Dye, Crede, or AJP don't produce, we're likely not going to get anything. Still, having 5 players you can count on to do something good every series is pretty good.
-
White Sox Loser
QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Aug 10, 2006 -> 04:02 AM) Well I was hoping to see bmac in the rotation this year, however according to Ozzie bmac was terrible last year. I guess having a 1.59 ERA down the stretch is horrible and our current rag tag group of starters are a much better option than the super stud that we dont want to trade unless we get a kings ransom. I would love to see Ozzie call Garcia or Vazquez horrible.
-
White Sox Loser
QUOTE(Dick Allen @ Aug 10, 2006 -> 04:00 AM) That's the problem. The starters are not performing, but our manager insists on extending them game after game after game, and it almost always results in more runs scored for the opposition. And then we act surprised that they're tired. As you've mentioned numerous times, their whole rationale about how they were going to use McCarthy to help take away some of the innings from our starters was an absolute crock. These starters look so tired, but Ozzie seems to be trying to push them now as if they're fresh.
-
White Sox Loser
QUOTE(ceffa2000 @ Aug 10, 2006 -> 03:58 AM) Would you say that he was playing for the playoffs last night, using Jenks for 2-2/3 innings? I think he does think about it. It just comes down to our starters not performing. We can't expect to score 6-9 runs a game every game. Yes, but when your starters are giving up rockets all over the field, it might just be time to take them out after 6 innings against a great team.
-
White Sox Loser
Our starting pitching sucks, as does our LF and CF position. If we can get some improvements from those positions, we're going to play better baseball.
-
White Sox Loser
QUOTE(Felix @ Aug 10, 2006 -> 03:54 AM) Ozzie kept him in to save his bullpen, which has already been used a lot on streak of 24 consecutive games in 24 days. He wanted to get more out of him to save the pen some work, but it didn't work out. I can't blame Ozzie for that. But if you're going to pull him after allowing one hit, you might as well just let the fresh pitcher start that inning. This is an argument many of us have had all year. Why wait for the pitcher to fail...give someone else the chance to come in and pitch better. As you know, our starting pitchers are not pitching to their abilities this year....we can't keep throwing them out there late in games and acting surprised that they're not getting the job done. QUOTE(Colorado Sox Fan @ Aug 10, 2006 -> 03:54 AM) If Riske does his job, maybe Sox win. Another ESPN game where we're getting blown out, make an incredible comeback and then fall short. Ugh. Jim Thome, please do something one of these days, meaningless solo homer, strikeout or walk isn't cutting it. Win ballgames for us, stud. Wait, you're blaming Riske and Thome? Thome just had one of the more impressive weekend series in Sox history in terms of getting on base, and Riske went 2 innings, 1 run in relief. If he was a starter, he'd be our number 2 with those numbers.
-
White Sox Loser
Just for fun, the greatest rotation ever assembled has the following ERAs: 3.75, 4.83, 4.89, 5.16, 5.18
-
White Sox Loser
QUOTE(Dick Allen @ Aug 10, 2006 -> 03:46 AM) Garland is going to have his share of starts where he s***s the bed. Unfortunately it happened tonight. He was close to weaseling out of some runs but the homers killed him. When you can't consistently strike out guys, you're going to give up a lot of 2 strike hits. That same thing happened today. Garland had a pretty good sinker working tonight, but he kept getting burned on his offspeed stuff (which is an average at best pitch).
-
Left field
QUOTE(Dick Allen @ Aug 10, 2006 -> 03:42 AM) Well, one thing is sure for me. No matter how obvious it is the Sox need a different LF, we aren't going to see anyone new until Sept. call-ups or 2007. I also don't understand bringing Garland back for a batter in the 7th. That cost another run. Evidently Ozzie has a rule that the last batter the starter faces must reach base. And what was the worst managerial decision of the night, pitching to ARod with first base open in a 5-0 game. QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Aug 10, 2006 -> 03:44 AM) Ozzie needs to click the eject button on the 2005 WS DVD. Because I think he uses that to help him figure out when to pull his pitchers. He waits until they get raped in the 7th inning, then pulls them either with men on or men in already. Then he picks the worst possible guys to get out of it, either Riske or Cotts is the flavor of choice with men on. Two contact pitchers who have a propensity to give it up. If the Sox are getting so screwed by the umpires, why is Ozzie just sitting in the dugout? Instead of seeing our pitchers continue to stare down the umpires and possibly lose focus, we need Ozzie and Cooper to go out there and stick up for his players. I'm not a fan of managers getting tossed, but this team seems to be getting very frustrated with the umps.
-
Left field
QUOTE(Dick Allen @ Aug 10, 2006 -> 03:37 AM) Its Paulie getting 1 base on a double clearly over the RF's head. It wasn't close. The only thing that makes me feel an ounce better about this is that Rivera would have been brought in to face Crede. Torre is a great manager when it comes to that.
-
Left field
QUOTE(CWSGuy406 @ Aug 10, 2006 -> 03:35 AM) Well, there is one reasonable option out there... Jose Cruz Jr. Of course, that'd mean that one of Gload or Ozuna would have to go. BTW -- the culprit of that 7th inning rally, which was killed, was AJ. 2-1 pitch, Villone had just thrown six of seven balls, and that pitch was several inches inside. AJ has been great this year, but man... he doesn't see a whole lot of pitches that he doesn't like. The AJP bat was bad, but it's just symptomatic of how asinine our catching situation is right now.
-
Left field
QUOTE(Milkman delivers @ Aug 10, 2006 -> 03:35 AM) Mackowiak has been raking righties all year. All fudging year. And he's looked bad recently at the plate, which isn't surprising as he's one of the streakiest players I've seen over the past few years. It's too bad he didn't get more playing time, not in CF, during his good stretch.
-
Game Thread 8/9/06
QUOTE(Harry&JimmyRocked @ Aug 10, 2006 -> 03:31 AM) why? they're 19 games over .500 Do you honestly think you're contributing one single thing to this board right now by continuing to post this crap?
-
Left field
QUOTE(BobDylan @ Aug 10, 2006 -> 03:29 AM) Yea. The options are so WIDE right now. What a worthless thread. Yep...lets keep throwing guys out there who have an OBP of about .225 since the ASB, and they can't field to save their lives. The funny thing is that I used to think that left fielders used to be a dime a dozen in baseball. It's usually the easiest place to play on the field.
-
Game Thread 8/9/06
QUOTE(Harry&JimmyRocked @ Aug 10, 2006 -> 03:28 AM) congrats to the 2006 white sox no longer in playoff contention Thanks. I take it we won't see you on the board again then?
-
Left field
Can we please find someone to play LF? Pods and Ozuna are absolutely awful right now, and neither one is contributing to any aspect of the game. I honestly don't know what KW is waiting for. I sure hope he's reviewing the waiver wire to see if there's anyone that can contribute anything out there. I'm all for giving Gload the chance right now.
-
Game Thread 8/9/06
QUOTE(Rowand44 @ Aug 10, 2006 -> 03:25 AM) HE F'N FLINCHED. I thought my eyes were deceiving me. I think there might have been time called already. If not, that was a blatant balk.
-
Game Thread 8/9/06
QUOTE(My Dixie Normus @ Aug 10, 2006 -> 03:25 AM) Is the shift on? No
-
Game Thread 8/9/06
A broken bat single would be lovely. QUOTE(Rowand44 @ Aug 10, 2006 -> 03:25 AM) Open up early and just attack Jimmy. Yep, he might as well cheat. Wow, Rivera balked there!
-
Game Thread 8/9/06
It's too bad Pods didn't end up bunting. Please at least make contact Jim.
-
Game Thread 8/9/06
QUOTE(maggsmaggs @ Aug 10, 2006 -> 03:22 AM) I guess everyone was right about Pods being a bench player (damn u Dayn Perry) Every day that passes, the more I'm convinced he had some enhancements in the past.
-
Game Thread 8/9/06
I still love how some people actually think he's underrated.