So this would be an example I’m trying to understand. I guess I though Gms under the Sox, until maybe like Hemond, we’re more like scouting directors and such.
The Sievers for Earl Battey trade is legend in my family because my great uncle curses Veeck to this day for it. I do think it could have led to one pennant more in the sixties even with the power house Yankees.
The Sabr article like this, it’s always referencing owners who lead the charge:
https://sabr.org/bioproj/person/roy-sievers/
Do we really have a permanent white Sox set up where I can attribute the bad moves to the owner and good ones to the GM ? I kinda love that.