Everything posted by Rowand44
-
GT: White Sox (41-44) vs. Scrubs (46-40) [1:20CT / 2:20ET]
Brutal.
-
GT: White Sox (41-44) vs. Scrubs (46-40) [1:20CT / 2:20ET]
QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jul 12, 2015 -> 03:32 PM) Hard for me to really get that angry about either of them. Arrieta has really been that good today, he'd be holding a really good offense down, plus the strike zone has been crazy which helps pitchers too. Cubs got a key early triple by a great player and that's the key to the game so far. Only real obnoxious one was the Arrieta HR, but it's currently not the diffrence in the game. Sometimes you're actually just outdone even when your starting pitcher goes 7.2 and gives up only 3 runs. Well said and agreed.
-
GT: White Sox (41-44) vs. Scrubs (46-40) [1:20CT / 2:20ET]
Real close.
-
GT: White Sox (41-44) vs. Scrubs (46-40) [1:20CT / 2:20ET]
QUOTE (Heads22 @ Jul 12, 2015 -> 03:12 PM) For the love of God, get the leadoff guy on and let's go f*** YOU--White Sox
-
GT: White Sox (41-44) vs. Scrubs (46-40) [1:20CT / 2:20ET]
Actually I take my previous post back, that was the correct call by the ump.
-
GT: White Sox (41-44) vs. Scrubs (46-40) [1:20CT / 2:20ET]
This ump really is awful.
-
GT: White Sox (41-44) vs. Scrubs (46-40) [1:20CT / 2:20ET]
QUOTE (Heads22 @ Jul 12, 2015 -> 03:01 PM) Do you? I know everything.
-
GT: White Sox (41-44) vs. Scrubs (46-40) [1:20CT / 2:20ET]
QUOTE (Heads22 @ Jul 12, 2015 -> 02:56 PM) They aren't the same person. You don't know that.
-
GT: White Sox (41-44) vs. Scrubs (46-40) [1:20CT / 2:20ET]
QUOTE (Condor13 @ Jul 12, 2015 -> 02:51 PM) Q is not sale. He got the job done though. What does that mean?
-
GT: White Sox (41-44) vs. Scrubs (46-40) [1:20CT / 2:20ET]
WE'RE THE BEST BUNTING TEAM EVER
-
GT: White Sox (41-44) vs. Scrubs (46-40) [1:20CT / 2:20ET]
QUOTE (pettie4sox @ Jul 12, 2015 -> 02:39 PM) I would feel bad for Quintana's run support if he stopped giving up cheap ass runs. Ya dude sucks.
-
GT: White Sox (41-44) vs. Scrubs (46-40) [1:20CT / 2:20ET]
QUOTE (pettie4sox @ Jul 12, 2015 -> 02:36 PM) f*** you Quintana. Ya he deserves that.
-
GT: White Sox (41-44) vs. Scrubs (46-40) [1:20CT / 2:20ET]
Well then
-
GT: White Sox (41-44) vs. Scrubs (46-40) [1:20CT / 2:20ET]
QUOTE (BigHurt3515 @ Jul 12, 2015 -> 02:31 PM) Is there any indication we are going to score? Nope. We're s*** out of luck in this game.
-
GT: White Sox (41-44) vs. Scrubs (46-40) [1:20CT / 2:20ET]
We got one back there.
-
GT: White Sox (41-44) vs. Scrubs (46-40) [1:20CT / 2:20ET]
QUOTE (pettie4sox @ Jul 12, 2015 -> 02:23 PM) If he stays consistent, no harm no foul. He hasn't. Q was just getting squeezed the inning before.
-
GT: White Sox (41-44) vs. Scrubs (46-40) [1:20CT / 2:20ET]
Ya this is bad.
-
GT: White Sox (41-44) vs. Scrubs (46-40) [1:20CT / 2:20ET]
This ump isn't being nice to us.
-
GT: White Sox (41-44) vs. Scrubs (46-40) [1:20CT / 2:20ET]
Arietta is nasty, we're in some trouble.
-
2014-2015 NBA thread
QUOTE (buhbuhburrrrlz @ Jul 11, 2015 -> 06:24 PM) Bobby Portis looks like quite the steal MCBuckets still looks like a MCBUST Beyond silly to make any conclusions during summer league.
-
Sox Winner!!!
QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Jul 11, 2015 -> 06:17 PM) Don't have hope don't have hope don't have hope That's what I keep telling myself. If we win today I know I'm going to get myself sucked back in just to get pissed off as the season goes on.
-
GT: White Sox (41-44) vs. Scrubs (46-40) [1:20CT / 2:20ET]
Is Jose hurt? What's the point of not playing him today otherwise?
-
AND THAT'S A WHITE SOX WINNER!!!
Well f*** it...lets just sweep so we can all have some hope just to get heart broken in a month or two.
-
All New Soccer Thread ~ All Levels ~ All Leagues
QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Jul 10, 2015 -> 08:23 PM) Lol @ FS1 mic picking that up. f*** you, you piece of s***. Unless I missed it, don't understand why FS1 didn't put up a good review of that offsides which negated the goal. You didn't. Looked onside to me on the quick replay they showed.
-
2015 Films thread
QUOTE (greg775 @ Jul 9, 2015 -> 07:04 PM) I love comedies that make me laugh. Have to agree with you here. This is definitely what I look for in my comedies.