No. The concensus on the board is that Garland is only a number 5 starter. That was a "wouldn't it be great if Garland was our number 5" type of situation. In Aug or Sept of last year, I compared Garland's numbers with the number 3 starters of all the teams still in contention in the AL. Garland compared on an average to favorable basis with all but Westbrook of Cleveland. Yes, even Garland's "Judy type numbers" were very comparable to number 3 AL starters, and better than the number 4 guys.