chitownsportsfan
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Currently
Viewing Topic: Munemania: Murakami leads league with 12 HR
Everything posted by chitownsportsfan
-
Politte's option exercised, Everett's Declined
I don't think people are worrying about just Frank's ankle. He's entering his upper 30's and he's put a lot of mileage on his entire body. It isn't likely that he can give us more than 300-400 AB's next year. Of course, I don't think anybody would complain about that. The problem with the DH spot right now is that a healthy frank is more than likely the best and cheapest option. But this plan needs to be backed up with something else, a contingency plan is definetly needed. If Brian Anderson is the answer coming out of spring training next season, he can play right on days dye is off or playing 1st, and split time with Frank at DH, and provide possibly a stop-gap if Frank is injured. I'm really worried that Frank comes back, plays great, and then Kenny is forced to make yet another mid-season trade for Carl, and the position is still a weakness.
-
Politte's option exercised, Everett's Declined
Furcal, you have got to be kidding me. Why would we want to move Uribe to 2nd and Tad to dh? A healthy Frank likely puts up a higher ops than Iguchi, easily. Furthermore, Uribe's VORP next season will probably be about 1/2 to 1/3 of Furcal's (it was almost 3 times Uribe's this season) , furcal doesn't get on base often enough for the contracit he is going to sign, whereas Uribe is a cheap contract, average hitter with a little speed and possibly the best defensive shortstop in the league--which VORP does not factor in to its equations. He's under 27 to boot. Likely to improve on all his career number in the upcoming seasons. If we could get Furcal for 8 million, wich makes him a bit more than twice as expensive as Uribe, then I would say go for it. But I think he's likely to get more than that, maybe 10 or 11 million, which is almost 3 times Uribe's salary. If Furcal 3 times the player? I doubt it. I don't see how we can afford to sign Furcal, especially when shortop and 2nd base are not positions of weakness for the team. And all this sabremetric crap doesn't even acount for how much it could possibly screw team chemistry to move the whole infield around for a player coming in with a huge contract from free agency. NO way should Kenny pursue Furcal, unless JR suddenly desides a 110+ million dollar payroll is realistic for the next 3 years.
-
2006 salary analysis
"Boston looks on there way to becoming a perennial playoff team" What? Perhaps because they are playing in what has turned into the easiest division in the league, but that is the only reason I can think for them being "a perenial playoff team." They have serious holes in their starting pitching, bullpen, and infield, Theo Epstein just resigned, Manny is threatening to go AWOL (that's just manny being manny), and they have an aging centerfielder who might leave town, and isn't a great option at the price if he does stay in town. Compared to teams like the Sox, Indians, Twins, Angels and A's, the Red Sox have a ton of questions. I mean, their GM just resigned and their (arguably) best player is demanding a trade out of town. Not exactly a great way to start the offseason coming off a sweep out of the playoffs in a year they barely made the playoffs in the last series of the season.
-
Will Frank be back?
Yea, they could provide much needed depth, especially Gload, as he is left handed, relatively cheap and more ready than Rogowski most likely. I think frank will be brought back, but there needs to be a plan a, b, and c at first base and dh next year. Perhaps dye could get some time there, and if Anderson shows enough in spring training then he could come in and play right on days Konerko sits. Just an idea. Considering 1st base could go from a team strength, to black hole, I think the balance rests on signing Konerko and going from there.
-
Will Frank be back?
Gload is not the answer at 1st. Konerko must be resigned. Frank will be back, hopefully healthy and productive either as a platoon DH or otherwise.
-
Don't you just love?
It wasn't a great performance, but it got the job done. I'm starting to think though, that if the starters can at least make a game of it, the bullpen and bats will come through enough as well.
-
Report from the Luxury Suites
Yea, well despite what Jay Mariotti says, hyperbole is not the way.
-
Report from the Luxury Suites
"He also spoke how it was difficult to be involed with removing the Comiskey name from the Park." You sound like this guys PR agent. He was the happiest man in the ballpark? Maybe the richest--wait, check that--probably not. The rich aren't heroes. I'm glad he bought the naming rights so we could afford some stadium upgrades, but I'm not going to deify the man.
-
Dan Patrick
I have no problem with bashing the national media for being ignoramus'. It's just with Mariotti around here, it's hard to find the time. Whats wrong with wanting a little respect? I mean, I just read this terrible, poorly researched article by Skip Bayless (who is a complete idiot, I hardly ever bother to read him) and it makes me want to puke all over him. http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story...=bayless/051020 The article says that Ozzie found "Bobby Jenks, who was the closer he lacked." Um right, I'm pretty sure Hermie was on the team at that point. He could be referring to Hermie's bad back, but I doubt it. His back was only an issue for 2 weeks or so, and by that time Ozzie seemed to have gone to closer by committee, then finally Jenks. He goes on to say that the turnaround to World Series after the near collapse was "the most shockingly unexpected 180-degree turn I can remember in sports." Perhaps he didn't watch Red Sox/Yankees last year? I think we have the right as fans to call the media out when they are writing or talking out their ass.
-
Ozzie going off on Mike North
Who cares, the more s*** Ozzie talks, the less the players have to talk. He's a genius in his own way, making all the news while his players go about their business. He's a Pennant Winner on a team that was almost universely thought to be mediocre, let him talk s***.
-
Kind words for the Bitchsox
Come on guys, batgirl is hilarious. Hate the fan, don't hate the person and writing.
-
FREDDIE FOCKING GARCIA
Freddy always scares me on the mound. I'm not sure why. He just seems so...wild some times. But, like usual, he proves my fears irelevent and goes the distance with a great performance. It didn't look like he had his best stuff, but the way the Angles are swinging, it was more than enough for a dominating performance. I tip my hat to the man for staying focused throughout the game.
-
oh my god
The last two nights have been surreal, because after the 3-0 lead, it just seems like the other innings are just academic. I haven't been stressed out like I was in the first two nailbiters.
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 4
"We're gonna regret not scoring that run from 3rd." that should be in green, shouldn't it?
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 4
a double play is NEVER a given...
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 4
It's not a "poor" play. Christ, give it up. Its not a good play, just average, so what, freddy worked around it, like a good pitcher should.
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 4
I've seen that called 90 percent of the time in my experience. Hell, I've seen a guy make a swipe and be a foot off and get it. Oh well, I always disagreed with that interpretation anyways. The rules says touch the damn bag, so touch it.
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 4
HAHAHAHAHAH BRING IN VIZ, AND LET MARTE GET THE 9TH! GOOD JOB CREDE
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 4
screw it, AJ has done enough this game
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 4
nice hit rowand, finally
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 4
Where is the guy that said write off tonight as a loss, since "santana is unhittable". LOL
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 4
Even if they somehow come back to win tonight, the Angels have screwed their bullpen for tommorow. Of course, the'll be even more screwed down 3-1.
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 4
Blame the umps all they want, we hopped on them 3-0 again. I wonder what baseball prospectus says the "win percentage" is after that... I bet it's in the 80%
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 4
I now, viz warming
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 4
If the runner beats the ball the ump will call save 90% of the time, thats just baseball.