QUOTE (WCSox @ Apr 24, 2010 -> 06:12 PM)
My point wasn't the salary commitment, but the lack of balance on the team. If you're committed to Peavy, Buehrle, and Floyd for the next few years and will likely have Hudson in the rotation next year, it might makes sense to deal Danks for a couple of young bats. He's going to be worth a ton with a couple of arb-eligible years left. (It may also be worth it to give PK an extension.)
I generally agree that locking up Danks would be a good thing (especially if Mark is truly done after next year). However, there are circumstances where dealing him may put the Sox in a better position to win.
You extend D1; you can still deal him for bats if you think that's the right move. He's probably more valuable if you can buy out an Arb year or two.
And anyway...no, you can't have too much starting pitching.