DrunkBomber

QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Oct 19, 2014 -> 09:08 PM) Jenn Sterger ‏@jennifersterger 7m7 minutes ago Hey Peyton, if that congratulatory text from "He who shall not be named" is an MMS... Prolly best to just delete that one. Thats great lol

QUOTE (fathom @ Oct 19, 2014 -> 07:49 PM) ACC officiating supervisor just confirmed it was the right call Whens the last time he read the rule book though?

Out of curiosity, is Pereira in on this conspiracy or is he just a victim of not understanding the rules as well as you?

QUOTE (HickoryHuskers @ Oct 19, 2014 -> 07:39 PM) That's the admission that the last one wasn't really a penalty when you have to go looking for something else. It just means that Notre Dame got one of their patented no calls earlier in the game.

QUOTE (HickoryHuskers @ Oct 19, 2014 -> 07:33 PM) Yes, I know who he is, but if he is using the word "intent" then he really doesn't have a clue. Plus I'm betting he hasn't watched the field angle. Fuller clearly doesn't have the "intent" to block when he cuts inside and the defender goes with him instead of going towards Robinson. So for the record, your stance is that because you read this rule last night that you understand it more and can interpret it better than the former senior director of officiating for the NFL?

QUOTE (HickoryHuskers @ Oct 19, 2014 -> 07:29 PM) No, what is laughable is for somebody to make judgments without reading and understanding the actual rule. It wasn't a penalty. Do you know who Mike Pereira is lol?

QUOTE (HickoryHuskers @ Oct 19, 2014 -> 07:21 PM) As a rules analyst he should understand that the rules don't say anything about intent. I'm guessing he also didn't see the ground angle of the play. I assumed you had to be trolling the whole time at least after this comment I can confirm it and move along.

QUOTE (Chilihead90 @ Oct 19, 2014 -> 07:22 PM) Yep. Like I apparently posted when I was wasted last night, refs had too much influence. Nothing those receivers/CBs involved did on that play changed the outcome. Refs often overlook or don't call that play, so you hate to see it at the very end to change the outcome. Im ok with this reasoning too. Consistency is important and dictates what teams will try to get away with, but for someone to sit here and claim it wasnt a penalty is laughable.

FOX Sports rules analyst Mike Pereira watched the tape and said officials made the correct call — both Prosise and Will Fuller's "only intent was to block" on the play What else you got?

QUOTE (HickoryHuskers @ Oct 19, 2014 -> 06:37 PM) Or, you could actually bother to read the rule. No thanks, reading the final score was enough for me to figure it out.

I guess Ill take an angry Notre Dame fans word for it instead of the officials and anyone else on the planet.

QUOTE (HickoryHuskers @ Oct 19, 2014 -> 06:00 PM) Because penalties shouldn't be called by the rulebook but by what the majority thinks the rule is??? Thats not what I said but nice try. Most people who watch or have played football know what pass interference is without having to run to the rulebook.

QUOTE (HickoryHuskers @ Oct 19, 2014 -> 05:00 PM) I'm also probably the only one who has actually read the rule. Quite a coincidence, huh? Yes, they could have called multiple penalties, like the automatic unsportsmanlike conduct penalty for removing your helmet on the field of play. The fact that you had to go read the rules to try to prove your point isnt helping your case.

QUOTE (HickoryHuskers @ Oct 19, 2014 -> 03:57 PM) The rulebook must be insane then. Youre the absolute only person in here who doesnt think it was a penalty. They could have called multiple penalties on that play if they wanted. Go cry about it some more.

Anyone who doesnt think there was a penalty on that play is absolutely insane.

QUOTE (Jake @ Oct 19, 2014 -> 01:08 PM) Defense is not the side of the ball worrying me today. This

Hate that call on 3rd and 1

So Im gonna start Denard Robinson this week...

Mid tier 11-20, Romo is 11th, and if you go by weekly average Palmer outscores Romo.

Addison Trail appears to be having a nice season. Looks like they play number 2 Glenbard West this weekend too.

Im officially done defending Cutler and this entire coaching staff blows.

I didnt even pay attention to this matchup last night because I didnt think there was any way my opponent could catch me. Ended up hanging on by .15. Big fan of that.

QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Sep 29, 2014 -> 10:36 AM) So I won again this week. I am currently 4-0 in my 10 team ppr league. I also just made a trade this morning, now this is what I was offered, I get McCoy and Mike Wallace for Montee Ball and Steve Smith. Hopefully McCoy picks it up. Made some other roster moves as I dropped Romo, which could cost me later but whatever. My team is currently: QB Rodgers RB Lacy RB McCoy WR Julio Jones WR Bryant WR Sanders TE Vernon Davis FLEX Mike Wallace DEF Bengals K Bailey Bench RBs West, Bradshaw, Chris Johnson WRs Gordon, Stevie Johnson TE Witten DEF Lions. Thoughts? That team looked great in the preseason but McCoy has been absolutely brutal and Rodgers and Lacy arent gonna play the Bears every week. Vernon Davis also has been a nightmare this season.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Sep 18, 2014 -> 08:17 PM) not watching, on a return? Did he finally get the record? It was a rushing td

QUOTE (ptatc @ Sep 17, 2014 -> 03:53 PM) Brian Quick or cordarelle Patterson in PPR? Quick is the best option for STL. Patterson may suffer with no AP. They couldn't throw at all last week. Id probably play Patterson every week at this point.