southsider2k5

QUOTE (whitesoxfan101 @ Apr 20, 2011 -> 11:02 PM) I'm all for making April 21st some sort of National Drug Testing Day. Even though that'll obviously never happen. That would be awesome.

Don't forget to click you picks! http://www.soxtalk.com/forums/index.php?s=...t&p=2355667

Konerko

Well done. http://m.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=101...150159822555679

QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Apr 20, 2011 -> 03:28 PM) What's his playoff winning percentage? It look like .250 (6-18) or about 41-121 over the course of a season.

QUOTE (Thad Bosley @ Apr 20, 2011 -> 03:19 PM) At least he's in good company. Joe Torre and Tony LaRussa's overall winning percentages average out to 87 wins; Whitey Herzog's 86 wins; and Tommy Lasorda checks in at 85 wins. Before anyone askes, Gardenhire checks in at 88.8.

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Apr 20, 2011 -> 02:48 PM) No, it absolutely is not left out of this post which I was replying to: Here's the record under ozzie. 2004 83-79 2005 99-63 2006 90-72 2007 72-90 2008 89-74 2009 79-83 2010 88-74 2011 7-10 Which leads to this: I included 2011, he didn't, which is why we have slightly different numbers, but Anderson took every year 2004-2010 except 2007. Which was in response to the orginal poster leaving off the two best years, which is what elecited that response in the first place. This whole thread was framed with the worst possible time frame.

zero chance of that actually happening.

X-rated filters suck.

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Apr 20, 2011 -> 01:59 PM) No it hasn't. The Sox are 607-545 (.527) under Guillen including this year. Removing both 2007 and 2005, they're 436-392 (.527). Removing only 2007 they're 535-455 (.540). Yes it is. That's why the overall record is 335-331 in the initial post. He dumped off all of the best years.

QUOTE (flavum @ Apr 20, 2011 -> 01:56 PM) And McPherson is at .314 in Charlotte. Might be a move brewing. one word. Omar!

Very descriptive indeed. Who knew elf-porn was popular?

Not again...

Liberals with their hug suggeestions. Bah.

Two straight off for Brent. Interesting.

Just you worry about your own kids. how I beat my kids is my business.

Hell no!

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Apr 20, 2011 -> 01:18 PM) If you're removing the low-side outlier, you gotta remove the high side outlier as well. That is pretty much a fair respose to a thread that is doing exactly the opposite of that. They are focusing in on just the low site outlier.

Funny, I hate hugs.

Be sure to keep your avatar out of this, and no one gets hurt.

Zip a dee doo da, aren't you a know it all.

XTC withdrawl.

Very useless. As is this thread.

QUOTE (The Ginger Kid @ Apr 20, 2011 -> 11:52 AM) I'm guessing that this is the proverbial "bump in the road" that his doc in Chicago warned about, not the shoulder inflammation, which by all accounts seemed to be unrelated to the detached lat. So good, got that out of the way. Now he can pitch through it and hopefully build up some strength. Imagine if you were JP and started feeling a pain in that same surgically repaired spot while on the mound. Must have been pretty frightening. And just as reassuring to hear that there's nothing wrong with it. Honestly, I think this is great news. With this actually being the Lat, instead of just the shoulder, that makes good sense. That'd be a great question for someone to ask the team.