Texsox

That's right, we will not eliminate bias in the media until every newspaper, tv, radio station, and magazine endorses the Republican slate. Then we will have eliminated media bias

Now the media bias blitz really kicks in

Is that his picture in your signature?

As a matter of fact, anytime the middle east is mentioned or can somehow be worked into a thread, I'm :sleep :headshake Of course, since your posts were the first I criticized on the subject you'll label me in all sorts of ways. As a matter of fact, I'd like to offer a nickname for you instead of 4E, how about Dynamo, you are so good at applying labels

You can bring Israel into any discussion, congratulations. :sleep

I AGREE with most of your points, I am just tired of reading them over and over again. Did I use any words you do not understand in that statement? Will someone who doesn't use a blunt nose scissors and ride a short bus please explain that to him? And may I add, notice how you took this from 70,000 dead in the Sudan and moved it to poor Israel?

SHe isn't making money off the crime, she is making money off the punishment. Plus, I believe she has made restitution. And Nuke, once we start your punishments, should we send in the military to remove the President from power. I believe good old fashioned torture and capital punishment is why we are in Iraq. Or is the WMD? I keep forgetting this weeks spin.

No, you just remind me of a ring tone. At first I really like one, then after a hundred calls, the same sound just gets tiring. I know your opinion, I in fact agree with most of it. But to have it repeated over and over again, gets tiring. Why not use your notepad, type out one all encompassing post and just cut and paste each time? You will not budge one inch, any dissenting opinion is anti-semetic, the world is out to get Israel and every Jewish person in the planet. Just add it to your signature.

Man, I am chugging the coffee my the gallon.

:sleep Gee it seems like just yesterday that dozens, no hundreds, of socially inept teenagers got together in their basements to creat weird alteregos and invent a new language

Welcome Aboard and you will find the Sex, Lies, and Politics forum is a better place for this thread.

:sleep

I guess it all depends on how important hypocrisy is in this campaign. Does it matter to anyone that Cheney will support the President over his daughter?

http://www.forbes.com/2003/02/14/cx_da_0214pres.html Wealth and US Presidents. Bush in Top 10.

If watching these two doesn't give hope to every boy in America that they could grow up to be President, I don't know what will.

Looking over the list of HoF members elected the past 25 years shows a strong slant towards guys who at least played in a World Series. IMHO, both guys are a long shot right now. Frank more so than Bags (to play in a WS)

And why was FlaSoxxJim in Prague . . .

I happen to agree but the whole 1st, 2nd ballot thing to me is always a joke. Does his stats get better for the second ballot? It is easy to build an offensive case for the HoF, and when I hear the argument that DH doesn't have defense stats to factor in, I wonder how bad of a fielder would Frank have had to be to not get in? Has there been any player whose defense caused them to be a visitor at the HoF and not a display? More problematic to me, and equally worthy would be a one dimensionsal defensive player who really throws the leather and bats .250 from the #8 spot all their career. If we consider a one dimensional player (DH) shouldn't we also consider a one dimensional defense player? Perhaps a catcher with a gun and no passed balls for 10 seasons. I don't have a player in mind, just throwing it out there.

A web cam and a e-commerce site would be more profitable

Has Cheney commented on the President's desire for a constitutional amendment regarding the definition of marriage?

You are most welcome. I read what you typed and it was very good, I just couldn't find specific answers to some of my questions. I dropped those questions from the next post. Let me ask the question this way. Which was more important, spending $2.1 trillion or having a $400 billion deficit? If a $400billion deficit is good is $800 billion Grrrrrrreat!! Should there be any relationship between income and expense? Can you US go into bankruptcy, or do we have the capacity for unlimited debt? Do you see a day when we have a surplus, or will we continue to run deficits every year? Is big government the answer? Currently we have both parties trying to outspend the other with no one complaining. Vote for me and I will give you $500 of my money -- illegal. Vote for me and I will have the government borrow $500 from China and give it to you, legal!