Texsox

"You're going to lose" "You're? Are you quitting?" "What?" "You didn't see we, you said you're. Sounds like you aren't part of the team anymore." He will learn.

QUOTE (Alpha Dog @ Nov 30, 2011 -> 10:05 PM) Some people seem to think that way when the topic is legalizing drugs................... I think that comes to no longer supporting the goal or the law becoming unnecessary. Laws like riding a horse on main street during the Sabbath or sodomy laws fit in here.

In today's encore excerpt - in moments of extreme duress, such as the duress police experience during a shooting, human perception alters radically: "Over a period of five years, [researcher Alexis] Artwohl gave hundreds of police officers a written survey to fill out about their shooting experiences. Her findings were remarkable: virtually all of the officers reported experiencing at least one major perceptual distortion. Most experienced several. For some, time moved in slow motion. For others, it sped up. Sounds intensified or disappeared altogether. Actions seemed to happen without conscious control. The mind played tricks. One officer vividly remembered seeing his partner 'go down in a spray of blood,' only to find him unharmed a moment later. "Another believed a suspect had shot at him 'from down a long dark hallway about forty feet long'; revisiting the scene a day later, he found to his surprise that the suspect 'had actually been only about five feet in front of [him] in an open room.' Wrote one cop in a particularly strange anecdote, 'During a violent shoot-out I looked over ... and was puzzled to see beer cans slowly floating through the air past my face. What was even more puzzling was that they had the word Federal printed on the bottom. They turned out to be the shell casings ejected by the officer who was firing next to me.' ... "The single distortion under fire that Artwohl heard about most, with a full 84 percent of the officers reporting it, was diminished hearing. In the jarring, electrifying heat of a deadly force encounter, Artwohl says, the brain focuses so intently on the immediate threat that all senses but vision often fade away. 'It's not uncommon for an officer to have his partner right next to him cranking off rounds from a shotgun and he has no idea he was even there,' she said. Some officers Artwohl interviewed recalled being puzzled during a shooting to hear their pistols making a tiny pop like a cap gun; one said he wouldn't even have known the gun was firing if not for the recoil. This finding is in line with what neuroscientists have long known about how the brain registers sensory data, Artwohl explains. 'The brain can't pay attention to all of its sensory inputs all the time,' she said. 'So in these shootings, the sound is coming into the brain, but the brain is filtering it out and ignoring it. And when the brain does that, to you it's like it never happened.' "The brain's tendency to steer its resources into visually zeroing in on the threat also explains the second most common perceptual distortion under fire. Tunnel vision, reported by 79 percent of Artwohl's officers, occurs when the mind locks on to a target or threat to the exclusion of all peripheral information. Studies show that tunnel vision can reduce a person's visual field by as much as 70 percent, an experience that officers liken to looking through a toilet paper tube. The effect is so pronounced that some police departments now train their officers to quickly sidestep when facing an assailant, on the theory that they just might disappear from the criminal's field of sight for one precious moment. "According to Artwohl's findings, the warping of reality under extreme stress often ventures into even weirder territory. For 62 percent of the officers she surveyed, time seemed to lurch into slow motion during their life-threatening encounter - a perceptual oddity frequently echoed in victims' accounts of emergencies like car crashes. In a 2006 study, however, the Baylor University neuroscientist David Eagleman tested this phenomenon by asking volunteers to try to read a rapidly flashing number on a watch while falling backwards into a net from atop a 150-foot-tall tower, a task that is terrifying just to read about. This digit blinked on and off too quickly for the human eye to spot it under normal conditions, so Eagleman figured that if extreme fear truly does slow down our experience of time, his plummeting subjects should be able to read it. They couldn't. "The truth, psychologists believe, is that it's really our memory of the event that unfolds at the pace of molasses; during an intensely fear-provoking experience, the amygdala etches such a robustly detailed representation into the mind that in retrospect it seems that everything transpired slowly. Memories, after all, are notoriously unreliable, especially after an emergency. Sometimes they're eerily intricate, and yet other times vital details disappear altogether. 'Officers who were at an incident have pulled their weapon, fired it, and reholstered it, and later had absolutely no memory of doing it,' Artwohl told me. If your attention is focused like a laser on a threat (say, the guy shooting at you), Artwohl says, you may perform an action (such as firing your gun) so uncon- sciously and automatically that it fails to register in your memory banks." Author: Taylor Clark Title: Nerve Publisher: Little, Brown Date: Copyright 2011 by Taylor Clark Pages: 245-248

Applause applause for knightni and another great list.

Thanks. His play has really come into focus the past week. The rest of my team is starting to gel as units. I have a great kid heading up my defense. He has them moving as a unit, he's helping them out, pointing out what to watch for, encouraging them, and playing his ass off. Up my left side I have two mids and a forward creating all of our opportunities and goals. I see one of them making a move and the other heading for an opening, the second mid trailing and backing up the play. Then I get to my right side and it is a wreck. Good athletes, but it's playground ball. Things will change, we will get that fixed. /practicing for the locker room speech. Once I have these units gelled, I can fit the team together.

My point is accuser supplied evidence is always suspect. Switch around the questions from what was actually asked, drop a few words here and there, and it can say something completely different.

Just please be honest. I dare even ask for respected. Hell, just being honest would be a huge improvement. Now give him some money and we'll be in business.

QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Nov 30, 2011 -> 03:28 PM) I agree that it could be edited and parts erased and things arranged to make it look more heinous than it would appear, but there are a lot of very direct statements and replies in that recording that are extremely specific about what she knows happened. Shack, what kinds of things do you like to do on the road, such as? QUOTE (iamshack @ Nov 30, 2011 -> 03:34 PM) it's pretty clear Such as her statements about wanting the dick... what was being discussed here. QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Nov 30, 2011 -> 03:43 PM) exactly, things like saying (EDIT OUT: I'm not saying that's true, if it was) Bernie needs to get a gay boy and (I just don't see that as something he would want) how (Edited: If that was really true the) he had something(an attraction specifically) for the victim. It is really hard to say that she was talking about anything but what Fine is being accused of. Again, I believe it is true, but there is doubt in my mind. I don't like accuser supplied evidence.

I realize I'm old school on some of this, so this really helps. I hope it is a wake up call.

This is 7th grade, their first chance and school sports in Texas. The football coach tried to rein him in, but is under more pressure to win and kept playing him while complaining to every adult. The head h.s. soccer coach preaches being a champion 168 hours a week. At home, in school, and on the field. My #1 priority is to fill the funnel for the high school. Teach as many 7th graders as possible our system, how to play within the system, and how to be a team. But of course we want to do that and have a little hardware for the trophy cases.

One of my soccer players is a very good athlete, perhaps the best athlete on the team, he sucks as a team mate, and can't play his position, instead runs all over the field. As a team mate he lets everyone know with his gestures and words that he could have made that stop, scored that goal, could play their position better than they do. Tonight when we needed a couple guys to put away soccer balls, he wouldn't help, instead I heard him telling one of his team mates to go do it because his mom was waiting for him. Ten minutes later I come around the corner and he's sitting there. I said I thought your mom was here. He said she was on her way. I asked why he couldn't help with the balls and he said because Nathan is the ballboy. (Nathan is a teammate, we have no ballboy). He is always asking to play another position, thinking he can do anything perfectly. After all this I decided to keep him out of tomorrow's game. I have watched the last couple games and scrimmages and my defense is working really well together, my two mids and forward on the other side works well as a team until this guy shows up to hog the ball and bring a defender with. My forwards are playing well together. The kid I'm putting in isn't as big or fast, but I know he'll be in position. I'm thinking it's time for the big we're a team speech. The team has too little passion, too little heart and I really believe keeping this guy at home will help. But damn, he is good. Thoughts?

Thank y'all for the education. Just a side note, and not exactly directly to this, but I'm still generally unclear on the law, but in an a global thought, should we scrap a law because some people have still done what the law is designed to protect? People and corporations break laws, but should be then just give up and not try? I see scrapping the law if the purpose is no longer supported, but not scrapping a law because people have gotten around it.

Cruella De Ville and Big Brother my first to show up. I wasn't expecting either one. Glad to see at least one other person remembered them

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Nov 30, 2011 -> 02:00 PM) The law is almost 10 years old now. Nothing has changed. Good point. It doesn't seem like 10 years.

Be in a relationship with a member and you are in. Who doesn't like a person in uniform My future son-in-law works there and recently helped a couple who are not allowed to be married in their state. They jointly qualified for all benefits.

QUOTE (Athomeboy_2000 @ Nov 30, 2011 -> 01:42 PM) He also said "there are no charges", but there IS a taped phone call where the wife admits he did it!! I'm a little uncomfortable with that recording. There are erased portions and who knows how it may have been edited. Not saying he didn't do it, or that it isn't necessarily not valid, but it isn't 100% reliable.

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Nov 30, 2011 -> 10:22 AM) I would answer with MF Global and UBS. What I am suggesting is the longer the law is in place, the less likely there will be another MF Global. As the industry and regulators get better at administering the law, the higher the compliance will be.

QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Nov 30, 2011 -> 09:45 AM) Yes I know it was Energy, I just couldn't resist the joke. And you are missing my point. I didn't say the result is good. I am saying that Rick Perry is thinking people are gullible, and that they'll actually believe it is even possible for him to get rid of entire agencies of government like that. It plays well short run, but then falls apart. Gingrich is smarter than that. That's what I'm saying. I believe a candidate should share their greater vision, the end point they are seeking. We should know the realities and how far they will actual get. It's the same thing I said when people talked about Obama not reaching all his goals. I want to see their greater vision, not the baby steps. Let me know what slippery slope you are taking us on.

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Nov 30, 2011 -> 08:52 AM) It is hugely expensive. And we have had plenty of accounting fraud since then. V, have you ever heard of Refco for example? MF Global? Isn't it also a situation where the longer the law is in affect, the better the results? Honest question.

QUOTE (farmteam @ Nov 29, 2011 -> 09:13 PM) Really, Boeheim? This is what you want to say? "I do my job. What happened on my watch, we will see. When the investigation is done, we will find out what happened on my watch." (emphasis added) I'm not sure if I could come up with a greater combination of snark, pomposity and arrogance if I tried for a thousand years. I didn't see it, I am only reading this excerpt. It sounds like he is saying he doesn't know of any, but realizes an investigation might show what happened while he was in charge. And investigating people that work under you is probably not his omost people's jobs. I keep thinking about people that I supervised and would I have known what they do in their off time.

Welcome to December Eve

I just found out my new bank, USAA, makes transfering auto drafts easy as can be. On their web site are hundreds and hundreds of businesses, click on the ones you have accounts with, and it happens automatically. Sweet!

And one more thing about Mark, whomever signs him, he will give 100%, just like always.

It does seem that Mark has become the first domino that will fall then a bunch of signing right after.

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Nov 28, 2011 -> 03:13 PM) This thread has never been about an honest discussion of the GOP candidates here. What would change?