caulfield12

QUOTE (greg775 @ Sep 29, 2012 -> 04:02 PM) I would assume season ticket sales will be 4000 less than this year or so cause of the lousy economy. Sox may need to make a splash and add somebody, anybody who might sell tickets. I'd bring back Buehrle for ticket reasons, get Miami to pay some of the contract and try to add a power starter as well. And if you can trade Rios, do so and try to add a bat. It will stay about the same. There's no way we're losing 20-25% of our season ticket base. If it was going to happen, it mostly happened coming into this year. Buehrle's not going to sell ANY tickets if the White Sox are +/- 5 games of .500, any more than Youkilis did after he was acquired. Power starter? Good luck on that one, at the rates that teams are paying, our 2nd "power" starter in Peavy's going to be grossly overpaid. And you expect Rios to tank, so you're just going to dump him for not much in return and then expect to replace his 2012 production somehow? That's a recipe for disaster. I can't imagine very many players in baseball that the Sox could acquire that would actually boost attendance on an average or slightly above average Sox team. Maybe not even Josh Hamilton would do it.

Ramirez showing up late that game we somehow lost to the Royals largely because of Olmedo...Ramirez getting picked off 3B....then his horrible hitting with RISP in the final 3 weeks. I don't want him traded, but I'm not going to be terrible disappointed either if they can get a good return for him.

QUOTE (Jake @ Sep 29, 2012 -> 03:39 PM) I'm enjoying the irrational Peavy hate Really no strong feeling whatsoever about him. He just hasn't gotten it done against the Tigers. End of story. That 6-0 lead he spit up at home against them still rankles.

Twins have just gotten pulverized by Verlander the last two innings when they had a chance to do some damage. Big game pitcher, defined.

Leadoff double for Plouffe. Three more opportunities with RISP, except the bottom of the order this time. Ooops, so much for that, horrible baserunning by Plouffe gets him picked off between 3rd and 2nd by Fielder. SIGH. Surprising play by Cecil to go to 3rd instead of taking the easy out at 1st. DET is really playing with an edge these last 11-12 games or so.

QUOTE (fathom @ Sep 29, 2012 -> 03:30 PM) Again, if you didn't know who was talking there, you would have thought it was a Tampa player. Praising Moore, Price and Rodney. If he wouldn't have tipped his cap over and over and over against the Tigers, we'd actually be leading the division still. Sure, we're getting no-hit, there's that. But good riddance to Peavy. Just won't leave quietly. Too bad we never made that Dye for Homer Bailey deal that was reported and seemed legit.

QUOTE (fathom @ Sep 29, 2012 -> 03:28 PM) 93.6, the lowest of his career I believe But his BAA vs. RH'ers has to be one of the best in the majors for a reliever. Isn't his overall average against still under .200 or close to it?

Maybe we can get no-hit by Moore to add to the injury...? Key wins (first game against KC, first game against CLE, Friday night) are being followed up by disappearances in the following games. Just no momentum.

QUOTE (greg775 @ Sep 29, 2012 -> 03:22 PM) The fatigue thing is awesome. The pussification of America has infiltrated baseball for sure. Thanks for benching AJ today. Against a filthy lefty like Moore, it's not a bad move. You can argue either way. Tyler's going to struggle with a pitchers on either side with plus stuff with his inconsistent at-bats again.

QUOTE (Jake @ Sep 29, 2012 -> 03:18 PM) This is probably a strong jinx, but Omogrosso is more than "just" a Sept call-up. He's actually very decent and might take over that Crain role in the somewhat near future. I'm happy to have him as our long man. Not so sure...he had a bit crisper fastball before the injuries hit. We'll see how it holds up over the course of a full season, were he to make the team out of ST. You'd have to go Reed, Thornton and Crain (not that I want to see Matt on the team again in 2013), Veal, Nathan Jones and that last spot is wide open between any number of possibilities like Omogrosso, Septimo, Marinez, Heath, Santos Rodriguez, Salvador Sanchez and the other youngster we have down in the AFL, Taylor Thompson, Rienzo, Axelrod, Castro, Molina, etc.

Pulled Sale, presumably. Tiger Woods sucks at the Ryder Cup again, and Iowa actually beat Minnesota. Weird sports weekend. 1st and 2nd now, one out, Morneau blown away by gas. Doumit, last night's hero, up.

Revere with a leadoff single in Minnesota. Mauer and Morneau following. Maybe their best chance to score against Justin...Mauer did have a ball he lined to the fence but it was oppo and didn't quite get there.

QUOTE (fathom @ Sep 29, 2012 -> 04:05 PM) More walks I've made the decision it's probably more exciting (or at least entertaining) to cheer for the Twins' offense against Verlander than ours against Moore. And the thing is that Moore had 3-4 starts in a row where he hadn't gotten past the fourth inning, so it's not like he came into this game on any kind of roll at all.

One way to deal with that recent abysmal 2/30 bases loaded success rate. If you just added 2-3 more hits in those key situations, we might be up by one game right now instead of struggling to stay alive. And 5/30 would be horrible STILL.

QUOTE (Brian @ Sep 29, 2012 -> 03:53 PM) Don't care hot hot he's been since ASB, Keppinger is a scrub and Sale shouldn't be giving up long balls to him. As noted, it was in his wheelhouse and his fastball just doesn't the life in the 2nd half to get away with it. The aura of invincibility for Chris at home has gone out the window his last couple of starts. Just wearing down. And he lost the advantage of the shadows hiding his slider. In the end, Walters has been a horrible pitcher with the exception of one start in DET. We're extremely lucky the Twins won that one. Too much to expect him to go out and beat Verlander with the Cy Young on the line (perhaps).

QUOTE (Brian @ Sep 29, 2012 -> 03:51 PM) I would vote Oakland, if they make it. Starting pitching and lockdown bullpen. We don't have any one area that's going particularly well right now.

QUOTE (kitekrazy @ Sep 29, 2012 -> 02:06 PM) He has to spin, it's his job. If you haven't, listen to the sound clip. The article isn't a transcript. I've also been following that thread on WSI. I just think in some ways, it's MORE embarassing that the crowds have been pretty horrible in September even when they dumped the controversial dynamic pricing model and finally considered the fact that getting a big home crowd behind them was more important than maximizing revenue... Yeah, some of it's obviously the agony of the recent 1-8 stretch, but that doesn't explain it completely.

QUOTE (Buehrle>Wood @ Sep 29, 2012 -> 01:33 PM) 2008 was really likable. And it showed on Soxtalk. We were all pretty content with the losses in the playoffs. And that was mostly because: 1) We FINALLY beat our hated rival, the Twins, to get there...the super exciting last 3 "must win" games just to arrive at that point were crazy 2) CQ, Crede and many others were hurt down the stretch, and Swisher had been benched for Wise 3) We knew we wouldn't play well in a Dome or on turf, similar to us having to face the Orioles this year, for example 4) The Rays were one of the best teams in baseball all season and historically were a tough out for the Sox 5) Due to rearranging the rotation down the stretch, we were forced to use Javy early in the post-season

“I don’t think any of them are out there saying I wish there were more people in the ballpark. But, without question, they do notice when there are people in the ballpark and giving them that lift and willing them to win,” Boyer said. “When the crowd is behind you, it gives you that little extra push. It makes a difference.” WHAT?

QUOTE (Marty34 @ Sep 29, 2012 -> 09:23 AM) First, Kenny Williams is a very good man, I like him a lot. This team's window to win is this season, it's not the time to develop of all things a LF'er at the cost of postseason baseball. Gee. Also not the time to develop..... 1) Reed and Nathan Jones as critical bullpen guys 2) Gordon Beckham for his fourth straight year 3) Brent Morel for key stretches of the first month and a half 4) Numerous rookie relievers 5) Tyler Flowers with inconsistent at-bats 6) Quintana and Santiago 7) Jordan Danks But we did all of those things and more this season. We STILL should have been leading the division with ALL of those things happening (above and beyond Viciedo's development), and we're still ONLY 1 game back with five to play.

QUOTE (whitesox901 @ Sep 29, 2012 -> 12:49 AM) Sox were really goofy that year. Seems like they'd go on the road and go 1-5, then come home and sweep the home stand. Like this year, a lot of things went right, Floyd and Danks had break out seasons, Contreras came back and had a good year (I think that was after his Achilles imploded). The offense was hit and miss, like this year, but everyone bounced back after 2007 where the whole team seemed to slump. In 2007 the bullpen lost , like, 21 games or something, next year the pen was solid (even Linebrink had a good year). Incredible. Danks, Quentin, Floyd and Alexei...the year of unexpected breakout performances that saved KW's butt.

QUOTE (ROC Sox Fan @ Sep 28, 2012 -> 11:55 PM) I had this picture on my dorm room door the next day. Alexei was the man that year. That was the year. I believed a little more that year. But that photo is making me dig deep and remember how to believe. God speed, White Sox. But we were down Crede, CQ and Linebrink wasn't the same in the 2nd half that year.

2 1/2 game lead over the Twins with 7 games left to play in the season (hence, bigger collapse) Spanked by the Twins 3 in a row, including a crushing loss in the series finale to put the Twins up by 1/2 game with 4 go to. White Sox play the Indians 3, the Twins played the Royals. Both teams lose the first two (the White Sox at that point had lost FIVE/5 games in a row before Buehrle stopped the streak!!!), the lead stays at 0.5 for 3 consecutive days as the Twins finally beat the Royals as well. Game 162, Gavin Floyd goes out and beats Garcia/Galarraga. Tied division. And then Game 163. In a way, similar situations in that we lost 3 games in the standings in 2008 in the final week...and we've gone 3-8 versus the Tigers' 7-4 (including the four game KC sweep, and 2-1 vs. Oakland at home). Looking back, 2008 felt a LOT worse and then a LOT better because we lost all those games in a row to Minnesota, and we'd already lost to Minnesota in 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2006, etc. This time, the losses were on the road in Anaheim and in front of small crowds at USCF.

QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Sep 28, 2012 -> 05:23 PM) Are you Ty Webb? Tyler Durden. Although I suppose I could be Keyser Söze.

QUOTE (The Ultimate Champion @ Sep 28, 2012 -> 05:18 PM) It all runs together. If Dayan lays off some of the terrible pitches he goes after & also relaxes a bit in the box, he'll stay in his ABs longer, which will lead to more walks, more hits, more power. That increase in BA, OBP, SLG will move him up in the order into more of an RBI position, which will make him even more dangerous and harder to pitch to. Right now Dayan is getting himself out more than the opposition is. The scouting report is getting him out, not necessarily great pitches. Viciedo looks like he feels the pressure & that's not going to work for him. With his bat speed and power the other way he shouldn't have to jump out guessing fastball trying to hit it 700 ft. He needs to learn he can take a pitch, not necessarily to draw a walk, but to prevent the opposition from getting ahead of him without having to throw the ball in the zone. I cited Vlad because Vlad is proof you don't need great discipline to be an elite hitter. Vlad would regularly go after the face-high fastball 2-0, start the AB off by swinging at a slider in the dirt in the LH batters box to go 0-1, etc. even when he was going good. Remember how badly the Angels fans wanted him gone after the Sox pitching staff completely worked him over in the 2005 ALCS? All plate disciple is is a combination of composure, smarts, knowledge of the game, strikezone, and situation, an understanding of the way the opposition pitches you, plus the eye. Viciedo has that eye and he shows it with his bat, but he just gets over aggressive. Because of that aggressive nature he's never going to be patient enough to walk a ton, but all the other stuff that he needs to be a more disciplined hitter can come with time and experience if he has the mental capacity for it. As a fan none of us know enough about him to just assume those other things won't come. The OBP, BB, etc. are just results & you can't necessarily condemn a talented young hitter for lack of ideal results because you have to give him time to develop into that kind of player. To me he seems like a good clubhouse type who adjusts well; the OF adjustment defensively and the increase in BB totals plus his continual advancement through the system into the Major Leagues (and producing there) seems to indicate a player with the capacity to continue to learn and make adjustments. In terms of his hitting tools there is no reason to doubt his potential. The bottom line is he's a productive young player who is young and has the potential to be worth a ton. Giving up on him is good why? We need cheap, young, cost-effective, team-controllable talent whether we want to contend or rebuild or do a bit of both. And if you trade Viciedo for a better player *right now* then you are talking about a player who will likely be a lot more expensive, under control for fewer years, and also probably older, probably in his prime or close to it, rather than several years out (at least as an offensive force). The only justifiable deal for Viciedo is if you trade him for another young, cheap, team-controllable player who also has serious potential. But if you are going to try to make that type of deal, and if you are making it simply because the ideal results aren't there right now, then the only deal you're going to find is another extremely talented player who is also producing under his potential, and again, you do that why? You only make that deal if you know something about his character/mental state/attitude, which none of us would know anything about. If I had Starlin Castro I'd trade him. Viciedo hasn't shown himself to be anything like that. Good post. If you look at Viciedo's numbers from late April through May in Charlotte in 2011, he's shown the capability to take a lot more walks. Part of it has to do with where he's hitting in the batting order. As long as Williams is nominally in charge, there's no way he trades Dayan at this point in his career. I'm not saying he's going to go David Ortiz-post Twins, but I've always been a big believer in his hitting talent, and his defense (especially considering his arm and how many opposing runners would take advantage of Pods and Pierre) this year has been a net plus for a LFer, compared to a negative. Like the rest of the outfield, he's had a few key defensive miscues in the last 4-6 months, but, overall, he's been just fine defensively. And yeah, you'd be looking at someone like Colby Rasmus, who can play CF and allow DeAza to slide over to LF where he's obviously more comfortable. And Rasmus, as we know, has his share of detractors. In fact, their OPS numbers are pretty similar. The main advantage you get out of that is improving the defense in two places, possibly.