Everything posted by caulfield12
-
Game Thread 5/22: BOS @ SOX
QUOTE (fathom @ May 22, 2013 -> 08:41 PM) Nothing like waiting until Jones has no breathing room to bring him in. Ventura absolutely got caught sleeping there, and had to waste more time to get Jones up. More evidence for the Ventura Bullpen Mismanagement Archives.
-
Game Thread 5/22: BOS @ SOX
5 base-runners, 4 outs. That's not so good.
-
Game Thread 5/22: BOS @ SOX
Omogrosso USED to have an elite fastball before his injuries. No longer THAT version. Poor Nate Jones, wallowing in the bullpen. Should have just sacrificed this game and started Omogrosso and had Nate Jones/Veal relieve him, lol. If this was Ventura's bold managerial move lurking in the weeds. And the team DOES HAVE AN OFF-DAY tmrw. SIGH.
-
Philosophical discussion...when a business isn't attracting custom
QUOTE (iamshack @ May 22, 2013 -> 08:25 PM) I'm talking literal sports cars...for instance, Audi makes basically its "brand image" model, the TT, yet basically only sells about 2000 of them in the US per year...they pour quite a bit of money into that model despite no one buying it...and it's not because it isn't a wonderfully designed car... So, in other words, what's our White Sox version of the TT, something that we pour time, energy, research and development dollars into, with an uncertain payoff? The closest we have/had is Courtney Hawkins. http://www.audiusa.com/cn/brand/en/about/a...i_in_china.html Au, contraire. Just like with US box office vs. global/international box office, one must look abroad to see the bigger picture. In China Audi remained the clear premium-segment leader at the close of 2012. With 405,838 deliveries in 2012 the Ingolstadt-based manufacturer broke through the barrier of 400,000 cars for the first time ever – having crossed the threshold of 300,000 units only one year earlier. Main drivers behind the 29.6 percent growth rate were the Changchun-built models: Despite a model changeover in March, for the first time ever Audi sold over 130,000 of the long-wheelbase version of the A6 Sedan in China within the space of a year (132,872 deliveries). The A6 L thus remains the top-seller in the brand’s Chinese model range and the most popular premium automobile in that market. 93,030 of Audi’s Chinese customers opted for the Q5 last year, a significant increase of 63.8 percent on 2011. Worldwide, too, the performance SUV was again the unchallenged leader in its segment in 2012 with around 206,000 units delivered. A large number of emerging growth markets likewise became increasingly important for Audi in 2012 thanks to their high growth rates: These include for example South Korea (+46.0% to 15,100 cars), South Africa (+15.5% to 16,771 cars) and India, where the brand’s sales gained 63.4 percent to 9,003 units. The company’s sales in Turkey, too, put on a spurt of 17.7 percent to 14,487 units, making it one of over 50 markets where Audi established a new sales record last year.
-
Game Thread 5/22: BOS @ SOX
Gillaspie sliding a little bit and Keppinger waking up is coming at the right time with Beckham returning.
-
Game Thread 5/22: BOS @ SOX
Here we go again...with the bullpen issues. Survived that one.
-
Game Thread 5/22: BOS @ SOX
Apparently, RV has more confidence in Omogrosso at this point. Jones is rested, is he not?
-
Philosophical discussion...when a business isn't attracting custom
QUOTE (iamshack @ May 22, 2013 -> 08:02 PM) The market for sports cars is the thing that comes to my mind. The Chinese (and to a lesser extent, Indian and Middle Eastern) markets have changed everything. Look at the profit margins for Audi, BMW and Mercedes-Benz and where they were 10 years ago. Or the other side, all the issues that Toyota and Honda have had in the last 5-7 years, where they were once the clear market leaders and had to reinvent their brands to an extent.
-
Game Thread 5/22: BOS @ SOX
But who pitches the 7th?
-
Game Thread 5/22: BOS @ SOX
QUOTE (TaylorStSox @ May 22, 2013 -> 08:07 PM) Say what you want about KW. That guys know how to find pitchers. Scouting. Axelrod and Santiago were both 30th round draft picks. Quintana was brought by his agent to the White Sox as a minor league FA, where he felt there was an opportunity and a good chance to work with Don Cooper. Now, give this team a 1st/2nd/3rd round draft pick (except for Addison Reed or Sale), they're likely to mess it up.
-
Game Thread 5/22: BOS @ SOX
Just noticed Verlander was torched again in the bottom of the 5th (now in a rain delay in CLE, with one out, 9-5 Tigers leading). ERA on the season would be 3.70 and climbing.
-
Game Thread 5/22: BOS @ SOX
SANTIAGO at USCF (2013) 7.2 13 5 4 1 1 6 4.70 1.83 (WHIP).382 (BAA) Bizarre home/road splits. Santiago has had 28 innings pitching on the road, coming into tonight. Averaging almost exactly one K per IP.
-
Game Thread 5/22: BOS @ SOX
Why is Santiago still out there with almost 100 pitches to start the 6th? (Answer: because the back of our bullpen sucks and there are no better options than to play with fire). This is where someone will say we need "long-man/5th/6th inning Santiago" to get the game to Crain/Reed, lol.
-
Philosophical discussion...when a business isn't attracting custom
QUOTE (fathom @ May 22, 2013 -> 07:54 PM) Last year's were just as bad. And The Will to Win only works well if your team is above .500. Some other business examples.....the cyclical ones, like computer manufacturers such as IBM, Dell, HP, Compaq or Gateway that were getting beat by superior technology/design (Apple) or overseas competition (Sony, Toshiba, Acer, ASUS, Lenovo, Samsung, LG, etc.) Motorola, in Chicago. Burger King, getting beaten domestically by Wendy's and revamping (especially their international operations) over a 2-3 year window. McDonald's, going into their McCafe's phase in order to fend off competition from Starbucks/Chipotle/Panera, etc.
-
Philosophical discussion...when a business isn't attracting custom
It has been commonly accepted by many at different Sox websites that the team is justified in not spending money at the deadline or in the off-season (if the Sox will be spending more money than they've earned or are projected to earn...of course, we've never been privy to that actual information, other than making educated guesses from Forbes, comments made by the organization, etc.) I'm not sure what you are saying here. Fans don't run s***. Their opinions only matter as far as it affects the overall business in terms of dollars. Apart from that, fans say stupid s*** all the time that makes no sense. One example: "I won't come to the games because the team isn't spending any money." Bulls***. You're not coming to the games because the team isn't any good. There is a difference. Also, money in baseball, at least as far as player contracts/signing bonuses, etc. are concerned (the "on field" stuff fans talk about), is a tool that you can use however you have to use it depending upon your situation, which differs team to team just as park factors will suggest on a team-by-team basis how to construct a lineup/pitching staff. Some teams have better front offices, better internal structure, etc. and can "buy" talent cheaply through trades while others "buy" players with money. Having a bad team loaded with bad players on bad contracts is exactly the same to the average fan as having a bad team with virtually no payroll and with those bad players making just about nothing. If you suck you suck, and the fans hate you because of it. Just the idea that it's OUR fault, you can't spend $1.00 if you have only 50 cents (which Hahn has intentionally avoided discussing, seemingly)...not saying it's ALL of the moderators, but quite a few have been taking the position that the White Sox are spending more than they actually should be (based of a comparison of payroll vs. attendance), which isn't taking 100% into account other revenues derived by large-market teams...which leads to the discussion of lowered revenues for tv/radio/advertising/sponsors by the doomsday scenario of us replicating the results of a 46-116 Houston Astros team for 3-5 consecutive years
-
Game Thread 5/22: BOS @ SOX
69 pitches through 3 for Santiago.
-
Game Thread 5/22: BOS @ SOX
Well, as "bad" as Santiago has been pitching, his WHIP is still nearly 0.10 better than Verlander this season. So if we can afford to send pitchers to the minors who look better (ERA, too) statistically than Justin Verlander, more power to them. It's only natural there was going to be some carryover effect in the control department...sigh. Miguel Cabrera only has 50 RBI's so far. Looks like he'll get a shot at a couple of more. Pouring it on against CLE now.
-
Game Thread 5/22: BOS @ SOX
QUOTE (fathom @ May 22, 2013 -> 06:48 PM) Santiago really needs work on that change-up. He should really concentrate on the change or screwball, one or the other. The likes of Johan Santana or Jose Contreras have proven you can get by with just a couple of very good pitches at the major league level...and maybe a 3rd pitch you throw 10% of the time, just to keep them honest. Sometimes, it seems young pitchers want to have 4-5 to demonstrate their full repertoire to scouts.
-
Game Thread 5/22: BOS @ SOX
QUOTE (fathom @ May 22, 2013 -> 06:44 PM) You think this sounds like someone who's confident? "It kind of sucks that I found out after I threw my bullpen," Santiago said. "For the most part, I think I'll be fine." Actually from everything you read about this kid, he's the anti-Floyd. Came up from a pretty rough area of New Jersey, via Puerto Rico heritage. To make it to the majors as a 30th round draft pick, you have to have some cojones. I never meant to suggest he's feeble-minded...just have always been a big fan and proponent of his starting and don't like to see him being treated (some will say mistreated) this way on a consistent basis. No more than I enjoyed watching Viciedo being moved from 3B to 1B to RF to LF. ETC. Or even Beckham being moved all over the field.
-
Mark Buehrle must be feeling snake-bitten...
He pitched well today. I listened for most of the game. The announcers mentioned the game 3 weeks or so ago where he gave up 7 runs to the Rays in a single inning and came back to get 11 of the next 12 outs and kept the team in the game, as they rallied to win 8-7. Those two runs were questionable. Originally, they were unearned, as Izturis made a foolhardy try at a grounder that he should have just put in his pocket and it ended up rolling into the outfield.
-
Game Thread 5/22: BOS @ SOX
QUOTE (The Ginger Kid @ May 22, 2013 -> 06:40 PM) f***. stupid stupid stupid play making the 1st out at 3rd. DeAza was out stealing 2nd, was he not?
-
Game Thread 5/22: BOS @ SOX
QUOTE (Soxfest @ May 22, 2013 -> 06:37 PM) PK has hit Clay well in the past. Different Konerko.
-
Philosophical discussion...when a business isn't attracting custom
QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ May 22, 2013 -> 06:26 PM) What other business would dump all of their quality products if customers weren't using their company, and tell their customers it would be 3-5 years before their product was decent again? American automakers/designers. Essentially, that's what happened over the 70's, 80's and 90's as they finally responded to foreign competition and improved their products and went bankrupt in the process, with the exception of Ford. Nokia, would be another. Apple Company, when they alienated Jobs and went through a lost generation of products in the wilderness with a Wal-Martesque leader.
-
Game Thread 5/22: BOS @ SOX
QUOTE (fathom @ May 22, 2013 -> 06:30 PM) Wow, De Aza running with a piano on his back? How many outs or simple mistakes has DeAza made this year already? He's more dangerous to us than Carlos Lee on the basepaths, sheez. More blunders than Jose Valentin and AJ in their entire Sox careers, one would think.
-
Game Thread 5/22: BOS @ SOX
QUOTE (Jake @ May 22, 2013 -> 06:29 PM) We are really overreacting to the potential risk of starting Santiago today. It is sub-optimal, but really not a big deal. Those side sessions are typically thrown at a very low intensity. You wouldn't develop any soreness, for instance. Some guys won't even throw them from a mound. But when you take a pitcher out of his normal routine...even if it's just one day, and it's not like Santiago has been a starter at the big league level for 3-4-5 years, it's going to shake him up a little. And we have no way of knowing exactly what was the velocity he was throwing at (some throw harder so they're a bit tired, others don't)...just the quotes we read from the newspaper expressing some doubt and trepidation. He's still not over the 4th inning Saturday, one would think. It's just a puzzling way to treat one of the most valuable assets in your entire organization.