-
Posts
100,452 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
35
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by caulfield12
-
4/7 Kansas City Royals @ Chicago White Sox 1:05 CDT - CSN
caulfield12 replied to qwerty's topic in 2009 Season in Review
Nice inning for CR. If he can be solid, that gives us five quality guys in the bullpen...not counting on much from MacDougal and Carasco but mop-up, "maintaining the deficit" for our offense to catch back up and blowout innings. -
4/7 Kansas City Royals @ Chicago White Sox 1:05 CDT - CSN
caulfield12 replied to qwerty's topic in 2009 Season in Review
I think Aviles is going to be exposed this year. No way he puts up the same numbers offensively as last year, and he's going to be a very much below-average defender at SS. That combo up the middle with Teahen might be the worst defensively in the entire major leagues. Teahen really misplayed that ball Getz hit into the hole and Jacobs dove over for a "gift" hustle double. -
4/7 Kansas City Royals @ Chicago White Sox 1:05 CDT - CSN
caulfield12 replied to qwerty's topic in 2009 Season in Review
Still, Brian Anderson is FAR from the answer at leadoff. It's the SAME exact problem we've been looking straight in the face for five months now. -
4/7 Kansas City Royals @ Chicago White Sox 1:05 CDT - CSN
caulfield12 replied to qwerty's topic in 2009 Season in Review
Well, Buehrle battled his butt off. We now shall see how good our "second tier" relievers are in the heat of a close game. Very encouraging defense today...Josh had a ball go by him because he was protecting against an Olivo bunt, but that "jump pass" might end up being the key out of the game if the White Sox can come back and win. The teams have traded numerous opportunities back and forth, with neither team getting an clutch hits to create some breathing room. Getz and Ramirez are looking like a promising keystone combo. -
4/7 Kansas City Royals @ Chicago White Sox 1:05 CDT - CSN
caulfield12 replied to qwerty's topic in 2009 Season in Review
I feel sorry for Wise and/or Anderson, because they're going to be subjected to a ton of pressure leading off...Anderson at least has his "fanbase" to support him, but I think 98% of the fanbase doesn't have much faith or confidence in Wise. This game is looking like it will test Carasco, Richard, Dotel and MacDougal with Mark's accelerating pitch count. Buehrle just doesn't have any command today at all. -
4/7 Kansas City Royals @ Chicago White Sox 1:05 CDT - CSN
caulfield12 replied to qwerty's topic in 2009 Season in Review
Thome would have scored because DeJesus' throw was well off...but you can't take that chance. JD just doesn't run well...but it's not very often you see a runner w/ 2 outs held up at 3B on that play. But at least Fields came through through...and Aviles has NO range whatsover, so a normal SS would have had a DP and two outs and that inning would have turned out quite differently. -
I am surprised Mariotti hasn't come up with one...just to get back in the public eye. The problem, of course, is that he never breaks any news, he just takes quotes and information from other media members and repackages it as his own. So the irony is that while Jay was complaining about the newspapers being irrelevant in terms of their on-line presence, it's his style of journalism which doesn't fit the new world of twitter and blogging.
-
QUOTE (JorgeFabregas @ Apr 7, 2009 -> 09:33 AM) I think the Twins are a pretty clear #1 in terms of rotation. However, I think the Sox have the second best rotation and second best lineup--while the Twins' lineup may be the worst in the division. If the Sox' defense is decent (which is no sure thing), then they should have a good shot at winning the division. I don't know...Baker is injured right now, and Slowey will have to prove himself year after year with his so-so stuff. OTOH, he's probably the best candidate (along with Sonnanstine) to evolve into the next Greg Maddux. Liriano might be able to throw 93-95 right now, but he still can't bust off that slider like he used to...that was his elimination pitch, like Johan's change-up that you just can't touch even if you're looking for it. I have a feeling he will never be anything but a #3 (possibly #2) for the rest of his career, before his elbow goes out again. It will be too much of temptation for him to throw that slider again, because his FB is pretty flat and is going to be hit hard if he doesn't get ahead in the count. Overall, Baker probably will be a better pitcher than Liriano from this point forward. Let's not forget, Perkins and Blackburn were VERY shaky down the stretch, Perkins was even skipped in the rotation he was doing so poorly (kind of like their pitching version of our Nick Swisher). Did anyone see Swisher's antics in the dugout yesterday when he got that PH double? Same old Nick, minus the facial hair. I just don't see him being happy getting only 150 at-bats in NY.
-
4/7 Kansas City Royals @ Chicago White Sox 1:05 CDT - CSN
caulfield12 replied to qwerty's topic in 2009 Season in Review
QUOTE (southsideirish71 @ Apr 7, 2009 -> 10:27 AM) The key for a Buerhle today is to attack the right handed hitters in. Drive the cutter in, back them off the plate, and then dive away with the changeup. When Mark gets hurt by the Royals, its when he sets up away away away and the Royals hitters drive the ball into right center. Drive it in on their hands, and force them to pull it. Lets kick some Royal ass today. Do we really want them pulling so many balls to Josh Fields??? Well, Crisp, Butler and Teahen are the ones who have torched Mark routinely in the past...those will be three key match-ups to see how Mark is feeling out there with his stuff and a somewhat lingering concern about Mark's career workload and "dead arm" coming out of ST. -
Ponson is the John Daly of MLB. However, he oozes (in a Terry Forster, tub of gooish way) with talent and goes out and beats the Dominican Republic in the WBC and yet another team thinks they can turn him around for good and gives him another chance...kind of like Jeff Weaver.
-
"I'm a little concerned," Redmond said. "A little more than normal." Redmond tries to avoid the training room at all costs, but he was in there after the game. "That's not a good thing," manager Ron Gardenhire said. "I don't have enough of those [catchers]."
-
Wouldn't it make more sense to use Danks against the Twins and RA Dickey on Friday night??? Contreras has always done pretty well against the Royals...
-
Still, it's pretty hard to argue with their level of success in working with the same type of pitchers that Cooper has excelled with. Chris Carpenter's career was going nowhere, despite all the talent in the world. Kyle Lohse...they even got a serviceable half-season out of Kip Wells. Ankiel is a hard one to explain, he's one of those guys a Disney movie (like The Rookie) should be made about his career someday, just like Josh Hamilton. Jeff Suppan would be another who rediscovered his career there...some others had mixed success, like Pineiro, Jeff Weaver, Sidney Ponson. Matt Morris really struggled after he left that team...although most of it was injuries taking their toll and age. The Benes brothers. They've seemingly done a very good job with Wainwright.
-
4/7 Kansas City Royals @ Chicago White Sox 1:05 CDT - CSN
caulfield12 replied to qwerty's topic in 2009 Season in Review
The division is ours for the taking. We can go out there and lead the whole season again, like 2005!!! Actually, it's very hilarious, the Twins and Indians fans are acting like the season is already over, they are jumping off Cliffs Lee like lemmings. -
QUOTE (Kenny Hates Prospects @ Apr 7, 2009 -> 12:16 AM) The rotations going into this year are going to be tougher than usual to gauge. Every team aside from the Sox has at least one very talented young pitcher who has never had success over a full season in the big leagues before. If one of Liriano, Reyes, Porcello, Jackson, or Davies stay healthy and go off this year then that man's team is going to be a lot more dangerous than it looks on paper. You've also got young pitchers who have had success in the past over a full season but are still young enough to be seen as question marks. Danks, Floyd, Slowey, Baker, Carmona, Greinke, Galarraga all fit this description. Then you've got the veterans in Colon, Contreras, and Pavano who could be huge pluses out of nowhere. The only pitcher in the whole division that I think you can call a consistent veteran that can be counted on is Mark Buehrle. Meche has only had two good years in a row and Lee has only had two above-average full seasons. Bottom line, there are going to be a lot of surprises. There will be breakouts, regressions, probably a veteran somewhere who will come back as an at least decent pitcher, and this will almost certainly be the division that leads the AL in number of different starting pitchers used. Each team may end up using at least 7 different starting pitchers, not counting make-up games. The Twins would appear to be the safest here in terms of depth, followed by the Royals (Hochevar, Cortes, Bannister), Tigers (Bonderman and Robertson), Indians (Westbrook later on, Laffey, Sowers), and lastly our Sox (Richard? Marquez? Poreda? Broadway? LOL we suck in this area, no good depth. Hopefully Harrell makes some noise this year, and I do like Egbert if he moves back to starting, plus there is Ely and Cassel, but there's virtually zero MLB experience here and nobody who looks like he could be better than a back-end guy sans Harrell). Yes, we're loaded with position prospects (I'm even sort of excited about Eduardo Escobar) and yet the only starters who might be CLOSE to legit are Poreda and Richard from all appearances. We need someone to step up out of nowhere in Winston-Salem and BIRM (like Santeliz) and have a DLS year and evolve to become a legit starting prospect. Marquez, after starting out looking like a possibility...has found himself in a sinkhole again. You just have to hope that Reyes turns out to be the Indians' version of Delmon Young. All the talent in the world, but a negative force/vibe in the clubhouse and with the coaching staff that negates his positive contributions. You look at their line-up, though, with the exception of Travis Hafner...they could be very very good if Choo, Francisco and Cabrera continue to progress. In many ways, the Indians are a mirror of the White Sox in terms of their issues (defense on the infield, back of the rotation, end of the bullpen, Wood's health I guess is more uncertain than Jenks...I also guess you could equate Hafner to one of our older "core" players going down with an injury, although it really looks at this point like you could stick a fork in him...they have two huge bats in Sizemore and Martinez, and Garko is relegated to the bench, with Shoppach being possibly the 2nd or 3rd best catcher in baseball this season (offensively/defensively) Imagine if Josh Barfield, Marte and Brandon Phillips all would have progressed? Phillips had a down year last season in terms of strikeouts and OBP, but he's the freaking clean-up hitter now for the Reds with Votto and Bruce around him. And he's a Gold Glove caliber defender, to boot. Still, I think the one move that will hurt them is giving up on Franklyn Gutierrez's defense. I think they will miss him, because Francisco and Choo on the corners are just so-so...which is yet another parallel with the White Sox. Still, I'll take my chances with Ozzie and Cooper and our staff over Wedge, who seems to never maximize the talent on that roster. They've got LaPorta coming...and we have Beckham/Viciedo, in terms of impact bats.
-
QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Apr 6, 2009 -> 10:21 PM) Scott Lewis has been a pretty damn good pitcher coming up in the Indians system and I wouldn't be surprised if he ended up pitching like Nick Blackburn did last year. Anthony Reyes has been a pretty solid pitcher coming up and, from everything I've read, he never bought into the Dave Duncan pitching philosophy. In his final 6 starts last year, he absolutely f***ing dominated. Fausto Carmona has amazing stuff and was mediocre last year, but I could easily see him being good again this year. And that's completely forgetting that they have solid options in Westbrook (when he gets healthy), Sowers, and Adam Miller too. Add all of that to the fact that Cliff Lee should be solid again, and Pavano could very easily be a solid starter. Cleveland has had luck with atleast one pitcher like that in the past, and it may be more than that. I am never really sold on Cleveland, but they could very easily be a damn good team this year. I'm not so sold on the Millers, Zach Jacksons, Aaron Laffeys and Sowerses of the world. You're right though, Lewis AND Reyes both could end up having very similar seasons to what we got out of Danks and Floyd. Which leaves three more question marks....will Lee go backwards again like in his sophomore campaign, will the real Carmona show up (and when)?) and can Pavano be both healthy AND effective? Not to mention we don't know what they'll get out of Westbrook when he comes back, if anything.
-
Francisco Liriano, the last of the three supposed aces going today, gave up 4 runs to the new and improved M's and took the loss. I actually think the M's will end up better than the A's, just a gut feeling. They've really improved their defense quite a bit. They don't have the pitching YET, but I think their overall pitching will be better than the A's and Rangers, but the Rangers' offense will carry them to second place. Crain gave up another run, as usual...love to see that, in other ways, I don't...because it might actually force Bill Smith to do something more substantive than trading for Eddie Guardado or Luis Ayala. It really looked for a day or two like they might bite on Juan Cruz but I guess the price was too high. Something else that was interesting...Delmon Young was benched for Denard Span.
-
Sox may have best chance to repeat in 2009 of the 3 AL div leaders
caulfield12 replied to VAfan's topic in Pale Hose Talk
Oakland has a lesser version now of the next Big 3 arriving, with Anderson expected to make a contribution right away. I think their other two top pitching prospects are at least a year away (one of them got roughed up by the Sox this spring). But when you start the season with Dallas Braden, and Duscherer's out of the rotation indefinitely, well...they're far from a sure thing to do much but improve by about 5 games. Gallagher's not the type to be a huge impact starter, either. Of course, they're just as likely to trade Cabrera, Giambi and Holliday and wait on their pitching to arrive. And you have to wonder how long Ziegler can pitch like Takatsu in 2004. The Angels aren't quite as good on paper, but Wood is getting close, Kendrick is ready for a breakout season, and so is Morales. They have a lot of depth in the OF, even if Guerrero is declining...enough depth to cut Willits, at least. Part of that has to do with the contract of GMJ obviously. The White Sox SHOULD be behind the Twins and even with the Indians, although many are picking CLE as the co-favorites. Cleveland finished strong and they have a really tough line-up from top to bottom...because Shoppach will give you 20-25 homers from catcher and Martinez is better hidden at 1B than catcher. The main questions with them are 1) the defense, 2) the starting rotation and middle relief, 3) Francisco/Choo/Cabrera....can they keep improving offensively or will they regress, and 4) the biggest concern, Travis Hafner. If Hafner's done, this team is much less scary. Although that LaPorta kid from the Sabathia trade might step in and made a huge impact. The Twins on paper have the best pitching, but their bullpen is shaky (it was Nathan's worst year), Ayala was the only addition to set-up, Mijares is overweight....Crede and Punto could both go into the tank offensively, and they really need Span's defense in the OF....Cuddyer and Crede are very, very similar players offensively, which means they're easy to get out...but it all comes down to Mauer and Liriano being All-Stars. If both make the All-Star team, I think that means the Twins end up winning the ALCD. I'll be optimistic...Brian Anderson will replicate Torii Hunter's numbers, play better defense and Willie Taveras/Darnell McDonald will put up even worse numbers, so we won't be able to say we're the most terrible in all of MLB. -
Couldn't take it, had to write editorial about Sox coverage
caulfield12 replied to caulfield12's topic in Pale Hose Talk
So basically there are no White Sox fans besides me in Iowa. Just goes to show you how poor the White Sox have been marketed that there are more Twins, Royals and Cardinals fans here 3 hours away from Chicago than White Sox fans. Embarassing. I guess I should join KW and accept the reality that the White Sox will never be anything more than a 2nd tier team...even if they win the AL Central 14 seasons in a row like the Braves did. Only grandmothers who go to Wrigley Field on summer tour buses with floppy hats overloaded with Rafael Palmeiro and Mark Grace buttons. -
Couldn't take it, had to write editorial about Sox coverage
caulfield12 replied to caulfield12's topic in Pale Hose Talk
From: Don Doxsie Subject: RE: Are we to believe the QC Times is also owned by Tribune Co.? To: [email protected] Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 9:32 AM I'm not sure you quite understand our fan-experts program, which is now in its sixth year. We run frequent items in the paper and online inviting readers to become our "expert'' on the team of their choice. We don't turn anyone away. We allow these people to express their own opinions whether we (or you) agree with them or not. You can hardly hold it against us that we had seven volunteers for the Cubs, five for the Cardinals and only one for the White Sox. Perhaps that's an indication that there aren't many White Sox fans here. Maybe we really should have a Cubs/Cardinals bias. As it is, we don't. We had one full-length story on each of those teams on Page 5 of Sunday's sports section. The headlines were almost all exactly the same size. The stories were of similar length (the Cardinals one appeared to be a bit shorter). And the main photo on the front of the section was Ozzie Guillen. It almost looked like we had a White Sox bias. Thanks for the feedback. Don Doxsie Assistant managing editor, Sports Quad-City Times (563) 383-2280 By that same principle, you shouldn't cover ISU or UNI or University of Illinois because there's a similar disproportionality in the ratios of fans and readership in favor of Iowa, and you are on the Iowa side of the river, correct? Having Guillen (or Piniella) on the cover is simple...it's all about selling papers, and both those guys are popular. I am sure there is a list of about 10 Cubs players that would be the 2nd/3rd choice after the managers before someone like Carlos Quentin, Danks, Buehrle, Konerko, Thome, Dye or Alexei Ramirez would be on the front page. No different than putting Obama on the cover everyday, it sells more copies. I understand the Tribune had a financial stake in the Cubs' success, But 7-1 or 5-1 ratio is pretty embarassing...and you would have to admit that if you were running the newspaper, almost all of the coverage would be about the Cubs. So really it comes down to the editor/s and columnists, right? Isn't it kind of a self-fulfilling prophecy, if you perceive there aren't enough White Sox fans, or if Hy-Vee only sells Cubs and Cardinals paraphernalia. How do you explain the hundreds of thousands of fans in Chicago for the victory parade in 2005? I doubt many of them were Cubs' fans, right? Just because White Sox fans are more skeptical and we don't believe the prognostications of Baseball Prospectus or ESPN/Red Sox/Yankee Nation doesn't mean we don't exist in significant numbers. I mean, I'm pretty sure you will vote for Sammy Sosa for the Hall of Fame and against Frank Thomas, right? -
Why are Brian Anderson, Aaron Rowand and Joe Crede not on the banner? Seriously, they should have their own Mt. Soxmore somewhere, painstakingly maintained by fanboys everywhere.
-
Even stranger was the surreal experience at Olympic Stadium in Montreal. It was during that season when hardly anyone was going to Expos games. (Which of those seasons, you ask? Be nice....). Playing there was like entering some sort of time-space vortex where you would get out of bed, walk to the train station, travel underground to the bowels of the stadium and take the elevator to the locker-room level. Once you got on the train, you did not see daylight. The game could have been at noon, it could have been at midnight, and you would not have known the difference. With the domed stadium only partly filled with fans, every ball hit and every conversation sounded like it was going through something Alexander Graham Bell was about to throw in the trash. Everything echoed, and the sound system made it sound like the announcer was speaking from a submarine booth 1,000 leagues under the sea. To top it off, he spoke in two languages, English and French, and the sound was so bad that no one could tell which one he was speaking in. As far as I was concerned, we were on the surface of Mars. To kick off their opening day, the Montreal Expos took a creative page from the hit show “Survivor.” They had dramatic drumming, a dance team, tiki lamps with flames, and grass skirts. The players went out to their positions and snuffed out their lamps like they were eliminating someone. Since most opening days revolved around fireworks, Blue Angels, parachutes and flying mascots, the burning tiki lamps really took us to a new place. It’s really too bad only a handful of people were at the game, because it was the most creative opening day I had ever seen. from the front page of today's NY TIMES
-
http://blogs.chicagosports.chicagotribune....pening-day.html Phil Rogers has us at #10 going into the season and winning the division (just barely) over the Twins and Indians. Mocks the idea of picking Indians with Pavano has the #3 and two inexperienced/erratic pitchers behind him in the rotation in Reyes and Lewis. Actually, picking the White Sox between 12-15 in the majors AND for our minor league system are both pretty accurate at this point in time.
-
More evidence against signing FA 1/2/3 starters
caulfield12 replied to caulfield12's topic in The Diamond Club
It doesn't matter much anymore, because the White Sox recent history in this area is limited to the likes of David Wells and Jaime Navarro. With the economy being what it is, this is all the more pronounced. We're always (with JR and KW) going to be an organization that will go after 3-5 potential Dankses, Garlands and Floyds instead of shelling out the money for a Sabathia, Burnett, Lowe, Sheets, Dice-K, etc. -
QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Mar 23, 2009 -> 04:16 PM) I'm not sure Beckham was ever considered to make the team out of Spring. It was generally agreed by the people on here that he would have absolutely had to tear it up (like .400/.500/.700 in Spring) and every other candidate would have had to tank for him to make, and those were the vibes the organization sent out too. Instead, he was just decent, and he's going to go down to the minors. I also don't know how raw Viciedo is after hitting decently, and AAA isn't a bad starting spot for him considering how he handled the Cuban league as a younger player. The only logic of Charlotte seems to be: 1) He can really build his confidence as an offensive player in a smaller stadium that plays more similar to USCF right off the bat 2) While the the starting rotations in AA boast of more prospects and harder throwers with better overall stuff, he'll be exposed to more ex major leaguers with experience and a steadier diet of offspeed and junk pitches than he would be in AA. We know he can crush fastballs, but the question (as it is with 95% of players when they're rookies) is how will he do when he gets behind in the count or when he has to deal with curves, sliders and change-ups off the plate. In this area, he has shown some positive signs of being able to pepper the ball up the middle and to RCF, which will obviously get him to Chicago faster (or an injury to someone at 3B, 1B, DH, LF, RF)
