Jump to content

ChiliIrishHammock24

Members
  • Posts

    22,528
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by ChiliIrishHammock24

  1. QUOTE (bobryansson @ Apr 9, 2010 -> 10:35 PM) From "Bull Durham," "Ya' lollygag on the basees. Ya' lollygag inthe field. Know what that makes you?" A lollygager?
  2. Only 1 way for Teahen to get back into the right with Sox fans. Walk 'em off Mark. Your popularity depends on it.
  3. Well, maybe this horses*** offense will force Kenny into calling up San Diego a little earlier than usual and can start working on this A-Gon deal.
  4. QUOTE (beckham15 @ Apr 9, 2010 -> 09:45 PM) pinch hit for who? we have quentin, paulie, and jones up He was referring to the Pierre AB last inning.
  5. QUOTE (daggins @ Apr 9, 2010 -> 09:43 PM) Pinch hit Nix then replace him with Kotsay in left. Suppose. Does not leave us any bench players though, in a tie game. EDIT: Oh yeah Teahen. I have been trying to block him out of my mind.
  6. QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Apr 9, 2010 -> 09:41 PM) The one thing Ozzie does really well (managing the pitching staff and bullpen) and now we're bagging on him for that. If we had any type of clutch hitting the last 3 games, things would look much different (well, at least Rios manned up). If Danks wouldn't be throwing 30 pitches in the first inning, we wouldn't have to burn the pen until an inning or two later. Alexei didn't help matters with his error, extending the inning and pitch count. Yeah, those 25 first inning pitches really sucked.
  7. QUOTE (daggins @ Apr 9, 2010 -> 09:39 PM) Nix -> Kotsay in the field. There is at least a small chance Nix can get the ball off the ground. Has Nix ever played LF? EDIT: 3 career games in LF, all last season apparently.
  8. QUOTE (daggins @ Apr 9, 2010 -> 09:30 PM) This may have been mentioned, but why is Ozzie not pinch hitting for Pierre, who I dont think has gotten a ball in the air yet? Anyone would have been better there. Like Kotsay, who ALSO has no clue how to elevate a ball?
  9. QUOTE (Thunderbolt @ Apr 9, 2010 -> 09:03 PM) I suggest you actually look into what deep in the outfield is. If I say "Into the outfield", does that give you any sort of clue as to WHERE in the outfield it was hit? No. Deep into the outfield tells you the outfielders actually had to move backwards to get the ball. I didn't say to the track, or the wall. My point is still the same, he didn't get WAYYYYYY under a pitch and hit it that deep. He barely missed one.
  10. QUOTE (Thunderbolt @ Apr 9, 2010 -> 08:51 PM) No, he didn't. He got waayyyy under that one. I find it hard to imagine he got "Waaayyyyy" under a pitch that was caught deep in the OF.
  11. Cubs just got a big dick in their ass with a their bullpen giving up the lead on a grand slam.
  12. Wow, Beckham has some range. He got a lot further than Quentin did.
  13. QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Apr 9, 2010 -> 08:25 PM) The last 2 innings have been ridiculously quick for Liriano, and he got the big double play to shorten that inning. Yeah, it's just hard to believe that Danks is already at 80 pitches considering he has looked real sharp. That first inning must have really tallied em up.
  14. QUOTE (justBLAZE @ Apr 9, 2010 -> 08:21 PM) Does anyone have pitch count on hand? http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/gameday/index.jsp?g...mp;mode=gameday 60 for Liriano 80 for Danks. Seems like the opposite, TBH.
  15. And, as I referred to earlier, those are the easy plays that Alexei f***s up......good lord.
  16. QUOTE (jphat007 @ Apr 9, 2010 -> 07:44 PM) What was confusing? You seriously think that about Rios?
  17. Those are the plays Alexei makes that get me so frustrated when he f***s up the easy ones.
  18. QUOTE (jphat007 @ Apr 9, 2010 -> 07:39 PM) Rios is f***ing awful. Ugh. I can't believe we're paying him 11 mil or 10. whatever thehell it is. lol, what?
×
×
  • Create New...