MexSoxFan#1

QUOTE (greg775 @ Nov 7, 2012 -> 04:55 PM) Yes, but we don't know how Hillary is going to act as the candidate. If she is Miss Prissy b**** as she's appeared to be in the past, I say she loses. In fact she could lose in a landslide. Remember, there are still intangibles in elections. Many voters still go by how a person looks on TV. If Hillary looks like an old hag and speaks words of b****iness and Rubio is up there all handsome and all that, he'll win in a landslide. I don't think you can give it to Hillary just because of Bill. Remember, women voted big time for Obama; men chose Romney. Women may not vote for Hillary just because she will be the first female president. And we know a lot of men will not vote for her just because she is a woman. The intangibles still leave a lot of unknowns ... mainly the Hillary/b**** factor on a long campaign trail. We'll see if Obama's coalition can hold, lot's of pundits didn't think he could replicate 2008. Obama's numbers went down because he lost working class white men and more Republicans turned out this time but if his coalition is a solid Democratic one, the GOP is in real trouble. They need to be more inclusive, old white guys won't win you elections anymore. If the economy is humming along in 2016, no one is beating Hilary.

QUOTE (RockRaines @ Nov 7, 2012 -> 11:42 AM) The fact that the Republican part is shocked that people voted for more people's rights regarding social issues like abortion and marriage equality instead of for their economic plan shows how out of touch they really are. Young people came out in mass to vote for Obama primarily for those reasons. Unless the GOP softens up their stance in no-win issues like those they are going to be behind the 8-ball. This If they keep on the path they've been on, TX will be in play for the Dems much sooner than CA or NY for them. Demographics in TX are trending blue.

I don't have Fox News (thank God), but I would've loved to have watched them last night for the lulz.

QUOTE (SOXOBAMA @ Nov 7, 2012 -> 09:26 AM) Romney, Akin, Mourdock, Walsh, and West... All lost. It was such an incredible night. I had about 40 people at my house to watch this amazing election Congrats to President Obama, Sen-elect Elizabeth Warren, Tammy Baldwin and Tim Kaine to name a few Thank you to President Clinton for working your ass off for the Obama campaign The same coalition that got O in the White House will put Hillary there in 2016 Hillary 2016

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Nov 7, 2012 -> 08:43 AM) Marriage equality won on the ballot in three states. Progressive champion Warren is in the Senate. Tammy Baldwin, the first openly gay Senator, was elected. Obama won with a strong electoral vote margin. This was a pretty solid night for liberals.

QUOTE (flippedoutpunk @ Nov 6, 2012 -> 11:10 PM) and colorado legalized marijuana for recreational use http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/06/a..._n_2079899.html The Mexican drug cartels don't approve of this...

QUOTE (mr_genius @ Nov 6, 2012 -> 10:46 PM) if he gets a perfect 332 prediction I'll send him an email apologizing on behalf of all you disgraceful doubters here at Soxtalk this made me lol

Proud to be part of the voting bloc that got Prez Obama re-elected. Hey GOP, if you want the White House in the future, stop using us as the boogey man to rile up your racists

QUOTE (greg775 @ Nov 6, 2012 -> 03:54 PM) Well, I truly was an undecided voter heading into the poll just now. I voted for Obama. I'm sick of having to base my decision on who I think is the best of 2 bad candidates. I can't remember the last time I was fired up about a presidential candidate. But of all the Soxtalker's I think I was the only undecided voter heading into today and I did vote for Obama though I do think he's been a poor leader. Or a very blah leader at best. I think Romney is a scary guy who gives me a weird vibe. He just does. I won't offend the world and say I voted for Obama cause he is a Sox fan and Bears fan, but that is one positive in his corner at least. Knowing me as you all do, are u surprised I voted for the Big O today? I'm surprised you didn't write in Ozzie Guillen.

Simple question, why can't all voting machines give you a receipt with the voting choices you made? You can verify it, put it in a ballot box and if there's any disputed result, you can go back and hand count them. Seems so simple as a solution, voting machines that leave no paper trails are an easy target to tamper with...and that would stop all the conspiracy theories about one side trying to steal the election.

QUOTE (SOXOBAMA @ Nov 6, 2012 -> 12:03 PM) Mark Halperin ‏@MarkHalperin After talking today to Ds who have spoken to Obama pollster & Rs who have spoken to Mitt's: Chicago sure of win; Boston thinks they CAN win Chicago vs Boston...wierd seeing Boston as the Republican campaign HQ.

QUOTE (Y2HH @ Nov 6, 2012 -> 10:52 AM) None of the ones here do...they're all on Soxtalk! Says the guy on SoxTalk right now... edit: he meant it as a joke, disregard my post, lol

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Nov 6, 2012 -> 10:42 AM) I hope this image can change the mind anyone who considered voting for Romney lol That's gotta be fake

QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Nov 6, 2012 -> 10:29 AM) Overall, early vote turnout OH up 2.44% in state. Down -4.1% in Obama/Kerry counties; up 14.39% in Bush/McCain counties. — Josh Kraushaar (@HotlineJosh) November 6, 2012 That's strange, I read somewhere that early voting in Democratic parts of Ohio were strong.

Every state should have early voting and election day should be a national holiday or on a weekend. The more people vote the better, it's our civic duty.

QUOTE (SOXOBAMA @ Nov 6, 2012 -> 10:14 AM) Luke Russert ‏@LukeRussert Democrats have a 66,527 advantage over Republicans in early voting in the state, a 10 point advantage what state?

QUOTE (Jake @ Nov 5, 2012 -> 10:31 PM) Why is it that every political scientist everywhere (and don't get it wrong, that's what Nate Silver is) is predicting an Obama win? Simply put, they hate the message so they try to kill the messanger. We'll finally find out tonight if the stats guys were right. My bet is that they will be. For all it's worth, professor Wang predicted the exact EV count in 2004 so that alone proves he isn't biased, he calls it as he sees it.

We also need to move the pocket more against Green Bay and I can't recall a screen pass to Forte ever working against them. The Bears need to work on that because conventional offensive sets ain't working.

QUOTE (GoSox05 @ Nov 5, 2012 -> 10:33 AM) Rodgers has only been ok against the Bears for the most part. It has been the Packers D that has killed Cutler. His numbers against the Packers since coming to the Bears are awful. This

QUOTE (Jake @ Nov 1, 2012 -> 06:07 PM) <!--quoteo(post=2721485:date=Nov 1, 2012 -> 07:00 PM:name=MexSoxFan#1)-->QUOTE (MexSoxFan#1 @ Nov 1, 2012 -> 07:00 PM) <!--quotec-->The thing I want to know is, do we have a 3 pt lead with the ball or on defense. Makes a world of difference. with ads like this, Romney will surely win the coveted Hispanic vote Wait what? That's actually a real Romney ad? I thought it was a spoof or something, lol. Romney's got my vote now after watching that clip...SMH. Professor Wang over at Princeton Election Consortium has it Obama 319 to Romney 219. This guy got the exact EV count for Bush/Kerry and was 1 EV off in Obama/McCain. http://election.princeton.edu/

All southern Wal Mart shoppers are fat and chances are great they are Republicans

QUOTE (bmags @ Nov 1, 2012 -> 12:51 PM) This is a great quote of explanation of probability by Nate Silver: The thing I want to know is, do we have a 3 pt lead with the ball or on defense. Makes a world of difference.

Bad cops, bad cops, a what cha gonna do, a what cha gonna do when they come for you...