Chicago White Sox

Which fits Friedman’s MO.

Kenny is right.

Why do they need to add another OF though? Berlinger, Pederson, Taylor, Toles, & Verdugo is a pretty nice group. Puig & Kemp were their two weekest OFs last year, taking up payroll and eating up roster spots. This makes sense regardless of Harper or not. As for who these guys will sign with, it almost always come down to money and don’t let the national media convince you otherwise.

I agree. I’m not ruling out Harper by any means, but freeing up $27M in 2019 doesn’t automatically allow them to add a $350M contract.

All the rumors said they were against doing a crazy long term contract with him. This doesn’t change that in the slightest IMO. I still think Kluber is their more likely target.

No offense, but you have no idea what you’re talking about and multiple people on this site who actully have connections have confirmed we’ve made massive offers to both guys. But keep hating bro.

I’m still not convinced this mean Harper is going to the Dodgers. They still have a fuckton of OFs and this doesn’t change their luxury tax position for 2020 onward.

This site is legit bipolar. I’m still struggling to see how any of this has to do with Machado.

Oh, you’re just being a Negative Nancy, was confused because I assumed you posting that had something to do with this actual thread. My bad boss.

What the fuck does this have to do with Machado?

The Dodgers save about $13M in actual payroll, but the luxury tax reduction is another $6M on top of that?

Unless there’s money changing hands, why would the Reds do this?

Your small sacrifice is much appreciated by the rest of us.

I will 100% agree with this. I know I’ve said some horrible, mean spirited things on this board and the mods have always given me an opportunity to redeem myself before receiving a suspension. The mods here do a tremendous balancing all the bullshit.

I think it’s a bit premature to say Moncada couldn’t be a 5 win 3B if we moved him there, but I agree it’s much easier to quickly build a competive roster with Machaso manning 3B.

One other plus in our cap for Machado is we now have three of his teammates from the 2017 WBC in Castillo, Colome, & Nova. We know he’s close with Welington, but maybe he’s got a strong connection with the other two guys as well.

I’m with you. I want long-term assets if I’m helping the Dodgers get Harper.

I agree, we need to land one of these guys no matter the cost.

It should or else teams would have a huge incentive to add tons of years for low salaries after an opt out. It would happen far more frequently.

Sorry, I framed that up poorly. Let’s say you agree to the below hypothetical deal: Years 1 - 4: $50M per Opt-out Year 5 - 10: $20M per That deal would have an AAV of $32M. For luxury tax purposes, if the player were to opt-out, there is no way the Dodgers would get away with only realizing a $32M hit those first four either. Either the structured deal above would be treated as two separate contracts for luxury tax purposes (as if the post opt-out term is an option) or this would be adjusted retrospectively. My guess is it’s the former because tax payers forfeit different draft picks when signing tendered free agents, but that’s just me speculating. Regardless, there should no way to game the system.

I actually don’t get it from the Dodgers perspective unless they get him for a steal. Teams like us are willing to pay a premium because of his intangibles and the potential revenue that come with. The Dodgers won’t reap those same benefits and on a standalone baseball move, $350M for Harper is somewhat ridiculous. Plus Friedman values depth / flexibility and has never signed a free agent to a $100M contract despite having the financial means with the Dodgers. I truly believe Bryce would love to go to LA, but I don’t see them coming close to what a team like the White Sox would offer. Just my option though.

Wouldn’t an opt-out potentially have huge luxury tax implications? If they front load a contract to minimize the AAV prior to the opt-out, surely there would be an adjustment if Bryce exited the contract to ensure the Dodgers contributed their fair share towards the luxury taxes. Just like with income taxes, there is no way to game the system.

The Familia stuff is news to me and would love to hear more about our pursuits there. Regardless, my argument isn’t about the Sox, but rather that the Phillies have yet to live up to “stupid spending” statement. That doesn’t mean they can’t go all out for Machado, but I don’t think we should just assume they’ll blow us out of the water. So far, they have been pretty measured in their pursuits.

Yup, amazing what a few suspensions can do for the quality of the site!

Exactly, they weren’t willing to blow out the competition for much more affordable targets, why do we think they’ll be any less measured when it comes to $300M+ deals? I have no doubts the Phillies are prepared to make a massive offer, but this idea they’ll do whatever it takes to land a whale is all speculation at this point. All teams have their limits and I think an Andy MacPhail led front office will hold his ground at some point.