Chicago White Sox

Exactly...FIP is literally a theoretical ERA independent of fielding and luck. HRs, BBs, & Ks are simply the drivers / inputs used to generate a theoretical ERA given their correlation with run prevention. It’s really pretty straight forward and I can’t believe it’s even be debated.

Appreciate the back & forth, but I’m done going down this rabbit hole and highly recommend you spend more time thinking through this and how multi-variable equations in general work. Like just read the link I sent you and hopefully it will all click at some point, because right now you’re completely off-base.

Hmm...that solves part of the gap, but not sure what the remaining difference would be then. I’m using spotrac for what it’s worth. https://www.spotrac.com/mlb/chicago-white-sox/payroll/

Really? Let’s just hope they don’t trade for a closer if they miss out on Hendriks. Way too many quality relievers are available for likely reasonable prices.

Are you including dead money / buy-outs and allocated signing bonuses?

Clearly you’re punking me at this point, so I’ll simply say you’re wrong and leave it at that to avoid me further disrupting the thread.

Which is terrifying. At least our existing core is pretty damn good and Lynn & Hendriks should be quality additions. Any frustration I have is more around a lack of killer instinct from Jerry when he already has a cheap core in place and could really make a statement with a small amount of money.

They are both trying to measure earned runs per nine innings (one actual, the other theoretical) and are 100% intended to be compared!?!

Seems like all but a certainty at this point.

Nothing like going “all-in” on a tight budget!

Those are the inputs in a multi-variable equation to predict ERA.

I can’t see them moving Cease or Kopech, which means Madrigal would have to be the prospect in question. Did he suggest what position they’d be targeting? Has to be starting pitching right?

What in the world are you talking about? FIP is an estimate of what a pitcher’s ERA would be if you stripped out fielding. It’s 100% meant to be compared to ERA to see how much fielding and/or luck played a role in a pitcher’s season and give you a better indicator of what a pitcher’s ERA would be all else being equal. WHIP is simply a measure of how many base runners a pitcher puts on-base per inning. I have no idea how you think any of what you just said is true.

That would be such a terrible use of resources. If Grandal is so bad at actually catching that we need to prioritize an expensive, 38 year old backup above other needs then the first move should be to fire Hahn and/or the pro scouts who endorsed him. Like I can’t even stress how pissed I’d be if we spent like $7M+ on Molina and go cheap with the #4 spot in the rotation and/or don’t add a left-handed bat to the mix.

I mostly agree here, but trading someone like Micker Adolfo for a backup catcher seems nuts to me. I would explore moving him for the reasons you state, but would much rather use him as a sweetener in a more impactful move, whether that be now or at the trade deadline.

Well of course it doesn’t measure actual ERA itself, but it’s output is an ERA equivalent and can most definitely be compared to ERA (in fact that’s the point!). I literally have no idea what people are actually arguing here...lol.

Our farm system will likely be bottom five by the end of the year without some massive breakout performances, so I’m hesitant moving any pieces unless it’s for a potential difference maker. If it’s part of a larger deal then maybe, but I’d still rather avoid it if at all possible.

Because that is probably an AAV / Luxury Tax based estimate, which is not the same thing as a cash-based payroll.

https://library.fangraphs.com/pitching/fip/

Trading for a backup catcher, short of just absorbing a contract, would be really stupid. If you don’t believe in Collins, just sign a damn free agent. Let’s not get overly cute here trying to find the perfect fit.

I didn’t say that, but FIP basically measures ERA so of course it can be compared to it. A guy with a 4.00 ERA & 3.50 FIP would have an ERA a half run worse than his FIP. I feel like I’m missing something painfully obvious here, because this is just basic math.

I’m guessing your post didn’t finish, but Bush & Sosa seem all but a certainty for High A given the backlog of prospects in need of full season reps. With Curbelo now 23, it’s pretty much boom or bust time for him, so High A seem pretty likely. Regarding Abbott, are you guessing he goes to High A because he’s further along than Mendoza (I’m guessing not) or simply because he’s more expandable? Both are roughly the same age, so that shouldn’t be much of a consideration. I’d think Mendoza is the better regarded prospect, but that’s mostly based on their stat lines.

I don’t follow.

The $109M does take into account arbitration salaries. The only things I’m excluding are signing bonuses from previous years (non cash) and $2M in dead money for Herrera & Konerko.

So if we’re sitting at $109M and you believe the following, we’d have between $26M & $31M to work with. Assume Hendriks takes $13M of that to be conservative and that leaves about $13M to $18M for another SP and positional depth. If you take the higher end, you can probably add a decent SP & a guy like La Stella and not have to trade to fill holes. But if you’re on the lower end and/or want a veteran backup catcher, things will quickly become tight. It’s really going to be a shame if we start trading our limited assets for C tier guys that we should be able to sign for just money.