Chicago White Sox

The only guy that potentially makes some sense to pursue via trade is Musgrove. Castillo & Gray are going to command packages we can’t afford at this time. After them, we can probably just get what we need via free agency (#4 starter, closer, left-handed bat). At least with Musgrove there is an argument to be made that he’s on the cusp of becoming a damn good #3 starter and is a tier above & beyond guys like Richards & Quintana. Still not sure if I’d want to give up assets for him or simply sign one of those starters, but he’s a guy who might be had for younger prospects that don’t factor into near-term roster decisions. Still, I’m doubtful he’ll come cheap due his very low salary next year and control through 2022.

Take it FWIW, but the foodies seem to believe there is optimism for a Giolito extension: Obviously there is a lot more work to do with the major league roster (Hendriks + Richards + La Stella being my personal dream), but extending Giolito & Lynn is arguably just as important. I’m sticking with my personal prediction of a deal in the 5/$75M range for Lucas with the 5th year being a team option. For the Sox, it buys out two years of free agency for the ace of our pitching staff and strengthens the back-end of a five year contention window. For Lucas, it guarantees a guy with one TJS already under his belt a lot of guaranteed money (dollars well beyond Nola’s current leading extension) and still allows him to hit free agency at 31 years of age. With Katz now in the fold, I’m more confident this is something Lucas will seriously consider. As for Lance, an extension around 2/$40M still feels about right to me. Some may view that as being too rich, but that’s basically the amount of a qualifying offer and there is zero chance we wouldn’t offer the 2020 version of Lynn a QO if he was still eligible. Plus those are pretty similar dollars to what J.A. Happ agreed to for similarly aged seasons back in 2019 and he was coming off a lesser season. And I honestly think that’s a salary he’d agree to given they’d be covering what are more or less his age 35 & 36 seasons.

Agreed. I think Thompson would have to be involved at minimum (despite being a pitcher) plus whoever they view the most favorably of the three guys you mentioned. Even then, there is probably more ceiling with the guys the Padres gave up and I think the Cubs are looking at a legit rebuild and are willing to gamble on prospects that are farther away but with significant upside. Unfortunately, our best positional prospects in this age / development group have lower ceilings in general since a lot of them are corner types. And to your point, it potentially wipe out a wave of talent that I think it is crucial for replenishing the system.

Is this the last move of 2020?

It truly is sad, but hopefully there is a pool in the sky filled with gold coins he can swim in for all eternity.

Oh I agree with what you’re saying here. I was just clarifying the difference between him not wanting to lose money vs. saying he’s in it to make profits. I think he’s perfectly willing to break-even during competitive years, but he’s not going to proactively spend in hopes of accelerating winning.

He spends when there is a high degree of certainty that revenue will offset costs. Look at our payrolls after the 2005 season when attendance was sky high and tell me that isn’t the case. The problem is he doesn’t want to take on any financial risk, so until fans start showing up he won’t spend more than what he’s confident will be covered.

I don’t get who is he building a trade for. Is that supposed to be for Darvish? If so, why is the price ridiculously higher than what the Padres actually paid?

Hoyer can claim they’re trying to balance winning with an eye on future, but straight up you don’t trade an elite pitcher for four 17 to 20 year old lottery tickets if a lengthy rebuild isn’t in from of you. There will be a lot more moves between now and next October and it’s going to be an ugly few years for the Cubs.

The Sox will be at $140M+ at some point in the near future, the problem is Reinsdorf will use COVID in 2021 and potentially a work stoppage in 2022 to be cautious about spending.

This play alone should get him in into the HoF

Sure, but it’s incredibly high risk talent that is years away from contributing. When comparing it to the Snell package, it’s hard to say it’s not an underwhelming return. I think in a non COVID environment the Cubs get far more for the NL Cy Young runner-up on a 3/$54M deal even despite his advanced age.

In what sense? The Rangers gave up quite a bit of talent, the Padres not so much.

Are you talking about for Lynn?

While 100% true, at this point I think it’s pretty clear the Ricketts are in cost cutting mode.

This same dude compared La Russa and/or Eaton to a serial child molester...not shocking he called one of the biggest assholes in the game “mild mannered” to feed his need for moral superiority.

Not after he fucked up our Jumbotron and refused to apologize.

In all seriousness, this agreement is exactly what projections had him getting via arbitration.

Finally some fucking news! Move over Padres, the Sox are now officially in the spotlight!

Sign Hendriks and hopefully that’s not an option.

I’d rather just develop him as a starter in AA next year and call him up to serve as a reliever for the stretch run, but it doesn’t appear they’ll be going down that path. It does sound like Kopech will open in AAA based on what Merkin has been signaling, so at least that’s a plus.

100% how I took it. And my guess is those starts are opening double headers and things of that nature.

Doesn’t sound like that will happen with Crochet though.

You’re right, but the issue I have is they rushed into an Adam Eaton signing in order to save money for “other needs”. That shows they are planning to operate on the cheap this offseason, even if there are hopefully more moves to come.