Flash Tizzle

QUOTE(Milkman delivers @ Apr 14, 2007 -> 02:18 PM) I can't explain how glad I am to NOT have to listen to Hawk right now. I can only imagine the s*** he's saying that would push me over the edge. He's not making any excuses, actually. Rather, he's ignoring everything on the field and talking about Cleveland playing in Miller Park. Several instances today he's criticized the team; particularly Uribe these last few days.

Why is Erstad still in? Why isn't he being substituted for?

QUOTE(Kalapse @ Apr 14, 2007 -> 01:59 PM) I have a hunch Ozzie might be on his way out, he's due for one huge outburst this year that includes a racial slur. The thing is, I don't necessarily won't him fired I just wish he weren't so f***ing stubborn. Even if Guillen crosses the line with a comment, I'm willing to keep him around. I honestly believe this team is due for several poor seasons. I'm not confident in our upcoming prospects immediately producing, our aging lineup/pitching maintaining career production, and competing with teams within the decision. But above everything else, I honestly believe Guillen's influence in Venezuela may be vital in drawing in talented prospects. Look at Felix Hernandez and Garcia. If, after an additional two seasons, we're not seeing this -- then let him go. After which he'll be useless.

another opposite field out for Cleveland. If I didn't know better, I'd say the offense realizes two things: one, Dye is slow as hell in RF; and two, Pierzysnki is consistently setting up on the outside plate.

QUOTE(SoxAce @ Apr 14, 2007 -> 01:54 PM) Byrd. 6 IP 5 H 0 R (I'll repeat that 0 R) 0 ER 2 BB 5 SO (I'll repeat that 5 SO for a non K pitcher) Wow.. I'm going to keep track of his next several starts after this. I'll guarantee he won't come anywhere close to this line.

QUOTE(fathom @ Apr 14, 2007 -> 01:48 PM) I agree, but we don't have to worry about him returning. The least Dye can do is continue being slow in the field and atleast have a decent hitting approach at the plate. Step 1: Not swinging and missing three consecutive pitchers off Paul Byrd. Cmon Dye, we're expecting class-A compensation. Don't disappoint us.

Was that catch in slow motion? Because it appeared that way.

Where's our Ryan Garko? Seriously, do we have any player who has went opposite field this entire season more than Garko has this series?

QUOTE(shawnhillegas @ Apr 14, 2007 -> 01:36 PM) We need Ryan Garko. Cmon, that's unrealistic. Every team would want a Ryan Garko. And a Grady Sizemore. And a Travis Hafner. And a C.C Sabathia!!!!11 Makes you wonder whether any opposing team watches our team and thinks, "Wow, that (player A); I wish we had a player of his capabilities." Outside of the bullpen, probably not.

Embarrassing. No reason at all for four straight swing and misses against Byrd in one inning.

That AB was pure Dead. Just terrible.

That John Danks, sure has bad luck. Anyone who opposes Johan Santana and Paul Byrd back to back just isn't going to have much run support. :lol

QUOTE(Dick Allen @ Apr 14, 2007 -> 01:16 PM) Byrd is the only pitcher who beat the White Sox in the 2005 playoffs. Sounds like you're laying the foundation for an excuse...... Byrd isn't even the Byrd of 2005. He's lost several mph. There's no excuse for our performance against him.

very un-grinderlike from Erstad.

I don't understand what's so difficult about Paul Byrd. How our offense has handled him is bordering on embarrassing. Against Santana you understand, but Byrd? Cmon.

It's sad when I wish our team had a hitter like Ryan Garko.

Chat room open for the coalition of the willing.

QUOTE(CWSGuy406 @ Apr 13, 2007 -> 07:06 PM) Are any of these guys Boras clients? Or is that still to be determined? Hopefully acquiring Danks means turning the page on the whole "not drafting Boras guys in the first round" for the Sox, but I still have my doubts. As of now, Greg Peavey is the only pitcher of the three advised by Boras. I agree with your sentiment regarding Boras clients. You can't expect to continually develop talent when the international talent pool is ignored, we're consistently picking 15+, and the quality players available -- which may demand more money -- are passed up.

http://www.soxtalk.com/forums/index.php?autocom=chat

Chat room is open.

QUOTE(Palehosefan @ Apr 13, 2007 -> 03:09 PM) As for Tolisano, he has very good power potential, this from BA Tolisano happened to beat out 6'3 230 pound 1B Anthony Rizzo in the home run contest, who was leading all of Florida high schools in home runs last time I checked. Still, a first round pick? Winning a home run contest doesn't convince me of power potential. You're talking about a hitter adopting a completely different approach. Notice how the same article later mentions how scouts noticed a quick stroke? I doubt that's the swing he was using during the contest. If we had a sandwich pick or two I'd be willing to select Tolisano. Since we don't, it should be between Aumont, Robles, and Peavy. Although I doubt Aumont will be available around #25.

QUOTE(santo=dorf @ Apr 13, 2007 -> 04:50 PM) In 2003 (?) The Sox scored the go ahead run in the top of the 10th (?) against Toronto when Konerko got hit in the nuts. I do remember DJ suggesting Konerko was hit in his "kibbles and bits." Earlier in the game was this classic quote, as well: "Oh, here comes the rain; better bring the tarp out. Oh wait, they don't have one -- it's a dome. Nimrods."

Well, atleast it won't effect me. That's really what's important here.

QUOTE(beautox @ Apr 13, 2007 -> 12:31 PM) in the first round of their mock draft scout.com has us taking a SS It shows you how much draft stock can change in the course of several months. Not that Frazier's position has been effected much, but several other names have -- among them Cole St. Clair. Bumgarner and Brackman have shot up more than 15+ spots respectively. Ugh. He doesn't seem like the type of player you'd devote a first round pick to. 6'0, 190 pounds MIF with speed sounds like Robert Valido and Pedro Lopez. Tolisano is more the pick Guillen would take, whether from the #1 or #25 position.

QUOTE(caulfield12 @ Apr 13, 2007 -> 09:00 AM) Or why we drafted Broadway ahead of Garza? I believe the more appropriate question is why we drafted Broadway instead of Carrillo. Or last year with McCulloch instead of Pedro Beato. Far as I'm concerned, the members of Soxtalk -- with far less scouting -- have made better first round selections than the professionals for two straight seasons. Now, It may be different for you, but I know I didn't think about Garza until the Twins selected him. If you look at the draft thread from 2005, several of us even joked that this kid Garza was going to be a stud. Not that we knew anything, but just that it was the Twins. Considering the sheer number of pitchers in this June's amateur draft, I expect them to make the right decision. Not the pitcher who has the "safe delivery" or is another clone of Broadway or McCulloch; but someone with a legitimate arm who perhaps slipped to signability concerns. I can tell you this early, judging from mock drafts, that I'd select either Tanner Robbles or Greg Peavy. This is if the draft were today; which it isn't. I'm sure the names will change (Cole St. Clair was rated #2 overall in an earlier Scout.com draft, and look how he's fallen). One name I'd hope beyond all hope falls to the White Sox is Phillippe Aumont. From what I'm reading, this guy has legitimate stuff; albeit a little raw. If we end up missing him by several positions I'll curse the White Sox for winning 90 games. 86 wins could have been the difference between selecting 20th and 25th, and wouldn't have changed anything about the club entering this season.