Bob Sacamano
Members-
Posts
27,666 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
18
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Bob Sacamano
-
QUOTE (RockRaines @ Feb 3, 2017 -> 09:22 AM) Theres a free plugin that can filter politics out of your FB feed. I saw it on WGN this morning. Damn...I need to find this.
-
Rangers have increased pursuit of Q?
Bob Sacamano replied to Sleepy Harold's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (reiks12 @ Feb 3, 2017 -> 10:01 AM) Rizzo wasn't so good when he was promoted either. I would be happy with Reed as a 3rd piece Dude has made huge adjustments to his stance and swing since coming to the Cubs. -
Rangers have increased pursuit of Q?
Bob Sacamano replied to Sleepy Harold's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (oneofthemikes @ Feb 3, 2017 -> 09:33 AM) Fisher, Paulino, Moran, and a pick doesn't even start a conversation IMO Looking at Fisher's numbers, I actually want him but as a 3rd or 4th piece. Dude looks like he can run, has power and can take a walk. Left handed bat. Also plays center. He reached AAA last season and is going into his age 23 season. Definitely someone who could be ready for a call-up around mid-season most likely (hopefully by that time, Melky would be dealt). -
QUOTE (Sox-35th @ Feb 3, 2017 -> 08:23 AM) A week before Terry retired, B&B explained that Who ya crappin was ending because the world had kind of moved passed it. Thanks. I just remember enjoying it and hadn't listened to the score at the time frame since like May.
-
Rangers have increased pursuit of Q?
Bob Sacamano replied to Sleepy Harold's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (striker @ Feb 3, 2017 -> 09:24 AM) If the Rays turned down Martes, Tucker, Paulino, +2 prospects for Archer, then that would be my starting point for Quintana, except I don't want Paulino. I listened to the TalkingStros podcast with Jim Callis. Callis called Quintana underated one moment, then called him a solid #3 another. And his job is to evaluate players for a living. The host suggested Fisher, Paulino, Moran and the #75 pick. Q would out perform that. Yeah they can keep Paulino and I feel the Sox don't necessarily need Musgrove back (MLBTR update had mentioned the Sox wanted him last time they talked, probably linked somewhere at the time on this site) if it means the rest of the package is going to effected by him being the key piece. -
QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ Feb 3, 2017 -> 07:10 AM) I would buy a Beer #69 jersey in an instant. Bust or not, its an amazing jersey.
-
Projecting the org depth chart and affiliate assignments
Bob Sacamano replied to NorthSideSox72's topic in FutureSox Board
QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Feb 3, 2017 -> 08:31 AM) Lowry had a pretty good 2016 in High A and actually made 4 starts in AA to end the season, so I kinda doubt they send him back down a level. Banks could very possibly be in that High A rotation, I just forgot to include him in my very large list of players accidentally. Fry has had 2 TJS', but he's a guy the Sox are still very keen on, so I put him where he ended before the injury. The Sox have made pretty clear they see Burdi as a reliever. Lambert was a 5th round pick and signed near slot last year, so he's going to be a priority arm. Question is, Kanny or W-S? He did get in 11 starts in Kanny, some of his peripherals were good but he got hit a little bit. He'll be in one of those rotations. Thanks! You could be right on Davidson, and Sanchez seems like the kind of player the Sox might trade for a B-level flier prospect during ST. Diaz I've heard both sides on his starting or not, but this team does like to have key relievers start for a year or two early on - he could very well fit that profile, it wouldn't surprise me. If that happens, you might see Thompson go to the pen, which I think is his ultimate home. Adolfo as well as Antonio Rodriguez are tough calls for me, Kanny vs W-S. Rodriguez is older (going into age 21/22 season) and got in 120+ games in KAN, but he struggled pretty badly and actually got worse as the year went on. Adolfo is about a year younger and only had 60+ games in KAN, but that was due to injury and actually got better as the year went on, with his overall results and K-rate improving to their best in August/September. Honestly, you can flip a coin with both of them on which A-ball club they open at. Given that Jackson Glines will turn 25 during the 2017 season and hit PIO pitchers hard, they might have him double-promote to W-S. Could totally see Sanchez being traded for cash consideration or a PTBNL towards the end of spring training. -
Rangers have increased pursuit of Q?
Bob Sacamano replied to Sleepy Harold's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (oneofthemikes @ Feb 3, 2017 -> 07:36 AM) Interesting that he mentions Chapman in the article. Possible that Robertson is packaged up with Q for another body or two? Maybe something like a 6 for 2 swap? I believe the Astros did try to sign Robertson and even offered him slightly more money when we signed him so its plausible. -
2016-17 free agency thread (NON WHITE SOX RELATED)
Bob Sacamano replied to southsider2k5's topic in The Diamond Club
QUOTE (SoxAce @ Feb 3, 2017 -> 06:25 AM) Sox really started a trend with teams locking up their core players to lucrative deals. Can be trade assets later if team doesn't compete. Rays and Pirates have been doing it longer. -
QUOTE (ChiliIrishHammock24 @ Feb 3, 2017 -> 01:28 AM) There is no doubt a lot can change and Beer could slip, someone else could emerge. I am rooting for Beer mostly because it's fun and would be cool to have the last name Beer on the Sox. I am not holding my breath that he actually pans out to be the 1st overall pick in 16 months. Beer #40 or Beer #69 would be an amazing jersey to own lol
-
FG projects Sox as having 3rd biggest fall off in defense
Bob Sacamano replied to southsider2k5's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Feb 2, 2017 -> 05:56 PM) Who is even left to play OF at that point to form "one of the better defensive OF's in baseball"? Bourjos, who I think makes the team as 4th OF. -
Is "Who ya crappin?" still a segment? I always used to catch it on my drive home when I used to commute in my car from work but I haven't listened to the Score at around the time they would do that segment since like early May of last year.
-
QUOTE (Sox-35th @ Feb 2, 2017 -> 02:59 PM) I don't mind the little I have heard from Parkins, but that low rent "can't do it" stuff isn't any good. B&B used to do "Ask us Anything" about once a year, but questions were like "What cars do you guys drive?" Seems like the kind of segment that would work better only responding to emails so you can filter through some of the terrible ones.
-
Rangers have increased pursuit of Q?
Bob Sacamano replied to Sleepy Harold's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (IowaSoxFan @ Feb 2, 2017 -> 02:17 PM) Yeah, I messed that one up as explained above. I will edit. An effective platoon at second base with Miller (they will likely add a 1B) will probably be more effective that Lawrie in my opinion. -
Rangers have increased pursuit of Q?
Bob Sacamano replied to Sleepy Harold's topic in Pale Hose Talk
Anyone else think Gonzalez is going to implode this year? I hope he doesn't but I can't help but have this feeling. -
Rangers have increased pursuit of Q?
Bob Sacamano replied to Sleepy Harold's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Feb 2, 2017 -> 12:32 PM) I think their offense is better than the White Sox. Rays have: Longoria, Kiermaier, Dickerson, Ramos, Rasmus, Souza, Franklin, Duffy with Adames knocking on the door. Their lineup is better. Their rotation is better too. And they likely add Carter (a guy they can hit 7th/8th for some extra pop but not really need to rely on for anything else other than 40 bombs) or Napoli. They'll get a solid platoon somewhere at second or short between Nick Franklin, Matt Duffy, Brad Miller and Tim Beckham. -
Rangers have increased pursuit of Q?
Bob Sacamano replied to Sleepy Harold's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ Feb 2, 2017 -> 12:11 PM) It has to be said at least once a week. At least once a day haha eventually someone will be correct. -
Rangers have increased pursuit of Q?
Bob Sacamano replied to Sleepy Harold's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Feb 2, 2017 -> 12:09 PM) Groundhogs day is quite literally the story of the Q trade threads. Would be pretty ironic if a trade went down today. -
Rangers have increased pursuit of Q?
Bob Sacamano replied to Sleepy Harold's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ Feb 2, 2017 -> 12:04 PM) I have a feeling that something will happen soon. We've now met our quota for the day. -
Rangers have increased pursuit of Q?
Bob Sacamano replied to Sleepy Harold's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (IowaSoxFan @ Feb 2, 2017 -> 11:41 AM) I think so too, but they still have Q. If the Rays trade Archer and the Sox trade Q, I still think the Sox would be better. Outside of Longoria, their offense is ridiculously bad, and even he is starting to slip. I really don't think their team is in as bad of shape as others do (Rays that is). But yes, it is probably the worst in the division (done trying to predict that the O's will be close to the bottom) haha -
Rangers have increased pursuit of Q?
Bob Sacamano replied to Sleepy Harold's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (SoxSteve @ Feb 2, 2017 -> 11:41 AM) Maybe pick up Martes in trade and then ship him to the Yankees for a couple of their position prospects like Frazier and Rutheford. Just spitballing here. Yeah this never really happens. Especially on their level. -
Rangers have increased pursuit of Q?
Bob Sacamano replied to Sleepy Harold's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (IowaSoxFan @ Feb 2, 2017 -> 11:20 AM) It helps the Sox because it puts pressure on the Astros to make a deal before he goes to a division rival. It also gets it out there that there is another team in the mix, which can push the market up for everyone, which is why the Rangers would immediately deny it. I don't get this logic. It's not like the Sox wouldn't be calling other teams saying that they are talking to the Rangers about so-and-so. -
Rangers have increased pursuit of Q?
Bob Sacamano replied to Sleepy Harold's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (IowaSoxFan @ Feb 2, 2017 -> 11:17 AM) I think the Twins are pretty much in tank mode as well, which hurts the Sox having a tanking team in the same division. Going by division: NL East - Phillies NL Central - Brewers, Reds NL West - Padres !!! AL East - perhaps Rays...not sure yet, they are trying to move their starting pitching and their offense is garbage. AL Central - Sox, Twins AL West - A's The Sox are also hurt from having two re-tooling teams in the division in the Tigers and the Royals while the Padres have three legit playoff contending teams in their division as well as what should be a much improved Rockies. If I were to guess an order based on the rosters today: 1.1 Padres 1.2 Brewers 1.3 Twins 1.4 Reds 1.5 Sox It's kind of weird, but I want the Twins, Tigers and Royals to do good this season. I don't want there to be any other teams selling off parts in July (though the Tigers seem to have a harder time then a team like the Royals with guys on bigger deals). -
2016-17 free agency thread (NON WHITE SOX RELATED)
Bob Sacamano replied to southsider2k5's topic in The Diamond Club
QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Feb 2, 2017 -> 11:04 AM) Jon Heyman @JonHeyman 2h2 hours ago chris carter has big interest from japan, but he he's been reluctant to leave mlb. rays/others in mix. @Ken_Rosenthal on it There's no way he doesn't get an MLB deal from at least either Texas or Tampa after Napoli signs. -
QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ Feb 2, 2017 -> 09:26 AM) Seth Beer is the only one I want. I'm leaning towards him myself over a high school player.
