Squirmin' for Yermin

Exactly my thoughts too.

I wouldn't assume that's possible since he spent the entire 2025 season with us

In my opinion this is not the year to trade high end prospects for older short term veterans. This is absolutely a wait and see year for me. If we can get some vets for AAA fodder, then by all means - but I wouldn't be looking at dealing from our top 10 (or so) prospects.

How does Emerson compare to Witt as highschoolers?

Agreed.

A fun one was Zac Gallen for Jazz Chisholm

You do that trade all day, but try floating Emerson or Lackey down to #4 by going overslot. Fo Sho

I know they are crazy rare to see, but I wonder if you could do a prospect swap with Billy Carlson for another similarly regarded pitching prospect. You can never have too many SS, but you also can't have too many SPs. This is assuming we grab Roch or Emerson. I wonder if they wish they could have that pick back and go with like an Arnold, or someone else - now that they control the #1 pick.

Maybe we can trade him for Cam Booser

Yeah I was all aboard Sirota.. Very sad we didn't grab him then, and now.

Awesome comment.

Yup.. Crazy comment cuz he still isn't in my (or likely anyones) future plans. He feels more like a fun story - hope its a long story.

Don't forget we are getting savings on Roch anyways. @Y2Jimmy0 What do you estimate the savings from Roch to Lackey being anyways? 500K?

Yeah I hated how the 80s night turned out. Was super boring and he clearly didn't care about the game, and kept saying that too lol. MUST-MISS

Oh no... not the mention of the backflip - Hawkins nightmares

I wonder how Law views the 3 hitters since he generally has a strong history evaluating hitters

Jerry requested that only one Montgomery be in the lineup on Braden's debut so fans don't get confused with who is who, like he does. - per sources

Carlson in a Detmers deal would be barf level for me. If I deal Carlson, which is fine - I'd want a similar prospect swap back. Or recent former young guy.

I liked Carela

I hate the idea of picking a catcher high. 150 games >> than 120 games. PLUS the annual wear and tear. Not many make it a long time. No he can't catch 120 and then CF for 30 - catchers need a break all together. NOW, if they thought he actually can move off C and go full time as a plus CF, then I am certainly way more open to the idea. Otherwise I am all Roch still.

fine by me

Agreed

It is? Can you share all the articles, rankings or mocks that have Roch not number 1?

I wouldn't want to do any move unless it is for a controllable piece that'll help us through 2030. I think you do try and get rid of any 2026 or 2027 expiring contracts and older players though since I believe we will have no 2027 season or a greatly reduced season

The latest is people getting prospect fatigue