16 hours ago16 hr https://nypost.com/2026/07/22/sports/chiefs-reveal-renderings-for-3-billion-stadium/$3 billion new Chiefs’ stadium in undecided KS location, 70% taxpayer funded to generate move across state lines Roof/dome technology will be fascinating to see how it plays out in other sports facilities, seems to let a lot of natural light inDo you really need a dome just for a handful of December and January games…or heat in early to mid September? Edited 16 hours ago16 hr by caulfield12
8 hours ago8 hr 7 hours ago, caulfield12 said:https://nypost.com/2026/07/22/sports/chiefs-reveal-renderings-for-3-billion-stadium/$3 billion new Chiefs’ stadium in undecided KS location, 70% taxpayer funded to generate move across state linesRoof/dome technology will be fascinating to see how it plays out in other sports facilities, seems to let a lot of natural light inDo you really need a dome just for a handful of December and January games…or heat in early to mid September?"Hunt added that the new stadium will hold 70,000 fans and will be built with the idea of amplifying the crowd noise."It's going to like the old HHH Metrodome, LOUD
5 hours ago5 hr 11 hours ago, caulfield12 said:https://nypost.com/2026/07/22/sports/chiefs-reveal-renderings-for-3-billion-stadium/$3 billion new Chiefs’ stadium in undecided KS location, 70% taxpayer funded to generate move across state linesRoof/dome technology will be fascinating to see how it plays out in other sports facilities, seems to let a lot of natural light inDo you really need a dome just for a handful of December and January games…or heat in early to mid September?I doubt the grid structure of the ETFE roof is going to be nearly as unnoticeable as depicted in the renderings. Is that a B-2 bomber flying overhead? They're not building a $3B dome for only the 10-12 Chiefs home games a year (half of which are probably being played in good outdoor weather). It's all about being able to utilize this kind of facility year round for things like mega-concerts (Taylor Swift, etc.), NCAA tournaments, and the one Super Bowl that the NFL will award to them for fleecing the taxpayers in such a grand fashion. Here's the complete set of their renderings (six images total):https://fox4kc.com/sports/chiefs/first-renderings-of-new-kansas-city-chiefs-stadium-revealed/
4 hours ago4 hr IMO, Sox should consider a retractable dome. Something like the ones in Seattle or Toronto. It make all the sense for fans and for the owners. The bad baseball weather days in Chicago seem to increase every year. It has gotten to the point where I will not even think about heading to a game where the forecast is questionable - i.e., hey, raining a bit now but there is a window to maybe get this one in. Then the cold and snow in late March early April, some uncomfortably hot weather or dodging summer rain storms. A retractable dome would be a bigger investment up front, but it would easily pay for itself.
3 hours ago3 hr 15 minutes ago, tray said:IMO, Sox should consider a retractable dome. Something like the ones in Seattle or Toronto. It make all the sense for fans and for the owners. The bad baseball weather days in Chicago seem to increase every year. It has gotten to the point where I will not even think about heading to a game where the forecast is questionable - i.e., hey, raining a bit now but there is a window to maybe get this one in. Then the cold and snow in late March early April, some uncomfortably hot weather or dodging summer rain storms. A retractable dome would be a bigger investment up front, but it would easily pay for itself.From the early discussions, it does not appear that a dome will fit on the 78 or Amtrak sites.
3 hours ago3 hr 16 minutes ago, tray said:IMO, Sox should consider a retractable dome. Something like the ones in Seattle or Toronto. It make all the sense for fans and for the owners. The bad baseball weather days in Chicago seem to increase every year. It has gotten to the point where I will not even think about heading to a game where the forecast is questionable - i.e., hey, raining a bit now but there is a window to maybe get this one in. Then the cold and snow in late March early April, some uncomfortably hot weather or dodging summer rain storms. A retractable dome would be a bigger investment up front, but it would easily pay for itself.We're not building a stadium with a focus on the skyline view and very short right field to be a retractable dome. The dome ain't gonna happen.
1 hour ago1 hr 2 hours ago, southsider2k5 said:From the early discussions, it does not appear that a dome will fit on the 78 or Amtrak sites.I still don't see how they get a park in that railroad yard. It's like Al Bundy trying to get a woman's size 8 foot in a size 4 shoe.
1 hour ago1 hr 3 minutes ago, Falstaff said:I still don't see how they get a park in that railroad yard. It's like Al Bundy trying to get a woman's size 8 foot in a size 4 shoe.I think they will find a way to also grab part of the BNSF section to increase the site dimensions.
52 minutes ago52 min On 7/10/2026 at 2:30 PM, Falstaff said:Because I am a fanatic, loyalty goes with the territory.I fail to see the difference between AH and Hammond if this is the criteria.
31 minutes ago31 min 8 minutes ago, mqr said:I fail to see the difference between AH and Hammond if this is the criteria.A fanatic is a person who holds extreme, unreasonable, or obsessive enthusiasm and devotion for a cause, idea, or activity. Often unwilling to consider differing viewpoints, they exhibit an intense zeal that goes far beyond what is considered normal or rational.It's sports 🙂
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.