Lip Man 1 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago Said it was the COVID shot that ruined his career: https://chicago.suntimes.com/white-sox/2026/02/09/white-sox-covid-19-lawsuit-vaccine 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago This thread will almost certainly be locked. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, Lip Man 1 said: Said it was the COVID shot that ruined his career: https://chicago.suntimes.com/white-sox/2026/02/09/white-sox-covid-19-lawsuit-vaccine Its always possible. People have negative reactions to various vaccines. However, it will be difficult to prove a, the vaccine did cause it, b, the team forced him to get it, c, the negative reaction was an anomaly from the norm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSox2023 Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago (edited) 22 minutes ago, ptatc said: Its always possible. People have negative reactions to various vaccines. However, it will be difficult to prove a, the vaccine did cause it, b, the team forced him to get it, c, the negative reaction was an anomaly from the norm This is what I was wondering. How can he prove it impacted him negatively? Also, what would the motivation be for the Sox to pressure a fringe prospect into getting it? Edited 3 hours ago by WhiteSox2023 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago I kinda hope the Sox use his prospect ranking against him because I immediately went "who?" 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 38 minutes ago, WhiteSox2023 said: This is what I was wondering. How can he prove it impacted him negatively? Also, what would the motivation be for the Sox to pressure a fringe prospect into getting it? Even if it did impact him negatively, its not negligence. Sometimes people have negative reactions and there is no way to predict it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 11 minutes ago, ptatc said: Even if it did impact him negatively, its not negligence. Sometimes people have negative reactions and there is no way to predict it. From the wording in the article, I wonder if his claim is focused on the Sox not giving him adequate treatment for his bad reaction moreso than making him get the shot in the first place. Not sure how plausible it is that quicker treatment or whatever would have any long-term impact on his recovery from the reaction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Jake said: From the wording in the article, I wonder if his claim is focused on the Sox not giving him adequate treatment for his bad reaction moreso than making him get the shot in the first place. Not sure how plausible it is that quicker treatment or whatever would have any long-term impact on his recovery from the reaction. That would be possible. It sounded to me like the claim was they pushed him into getting them. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.