June 13, 200718 yr Author QUOTE(Gregory Pratt @ Jun 13, 2007 -> 09:57 AM) IMO, that's a fluke. Would it really be that horrible to trade Contreras and insert Masset into the rotation?
June 13, 200718 yr QUOTE(RockRaines @ Jun 13, 2007 -> 10:47 AM) Would it really be that horrible to trade Contreras and insert Masset into the rotation? I think Masset will be a good starter. He is just one of those guys who doesn't do well as a short reliever. When he gets to pitch a longer outing, where he can approach it like a starter and use all of his pitches he does well. I would like to see Massett get some starts with Contreras on the DL. And I would like to see Floyd and how much he has progressed if we trade Buerhle. This is Floyds last year with options. Now no matter what people think, the kid has plus plus stuff. His problem is throwing strikes, and his noggin. This year to me was about rebuilding Floyd from the mental side, and getting him to throw strikes. I would like to see now what we have, and if it can project to be a decent starter.
June 13, 200718 yr Thanks Rock. It was good to see. It hasn't changed the fact that I have been selling off my tickets.
June 13, 200718 yr QUOTE(RockRaines @ Jun 13, 2007 -> 03:47 PM) Would it really be that horrible to trade Contreras and insert Masset into the rotation? If we put Gio or Floyd into the rotation, it would be a lot more interesting than seeing Contreras throw 87 mph with no command and 1/10th the forkball he used to have. Could it be that Contreras has the first big money contract that KW messed up on?
June 13, 200718 yr QUOTE(RockRaines @ Jun 13, 2007 -> 10:47 AM) Would it really be that horrible to trade Contreras and insert Masset into the rotation? Well, Contreras has a no trade clause, a big contract, and every other major league can see that he simply looks terrible on the mound. So I think he'll be difficult to move. The Sox are likely stuck with that albatross of a contract through 2009. Also, I don't think Masset is very good. He has 4 pitches but little control, his fastball is a mediocre 92 MPH and his WHIP is 1.87 and he has more walks than Ks. If the Sox DL Contreras I'd rather see Floyd called up. QUOTE(fathom @ Jun 13, 2007 -> 11:01 AM) If we put Gio or Floyd into the rotation, it would be a lot more interesting than seeing Contreras throw 87 mph with no command and 1/10th the forkball he used to have. Could it be that Contreras has the first big money contract that KW messed up on? I think Konerko's contract was the first one he messed up on. Edited June 13, 200718 yr by hitlesswonder
June 13, 200718 yr QUOTE(hitlesswonder @ Jun 13, 2007 -> 04:03 PM) Well, Contreras has a no trade clause, a big contract, and every other major league can see that he simply looks terrible on the mound. So I think he'll be difficult to move. The Sox are likely stuck with that albatross of a contract through 2009. Also, I don't think Masset is very good. He has 4 pitches but little control, his fastball is a mediocre 92 MPH and his WHIP is 1.87 and he has more walks than Ks. If the Sox DL Contreras I'd rather see Floyd called up. I think Konerko's contract was the first one he messed up on. I don't think Paulie's contract is that bad. Now, Contreras' and Vazquez's on the other hand will prevent this team from being competitive in '08 and they'll lose Buehrle because of them. If not for Vazquez and Contreras, the rotation in '08 would be: Buehrle (Re-signed thanks to ditching Vaz 11 and Count 9 from this offseason) Garland Danks Masset Floyd/Gonzalez Winner in Spring Training I could have lived with that rotation next yr than this projected '08 rotation: Garland Contreras (Do they have a choice really?) Vazquez (Again, no choice but to put mediocrity here) Danks Masset/Floyd/Gonzalez Winner in Spring Training
June 13, 200718 yr Author QUOTE(hitlesswonder @ Jun 13, 2007 -> 11:03 AM) Well, Contreras has a no trade clause, a big contract, and every other major league can see that he simply looks terrible on the mound. So I think he'll be difficult to move. The Sox are likely stuck with that albatross of a contract through 2009. Also, I don't think Masset is very good. He has 4 pitches but little control, his fastball is a mediocre 92 MPH and his WHIP is 1.87 and he has more walks than Ks. If the Sox DL Contreras I'd rather see Floyd called up. I think Konerko's contract was the first one he messed up on. With all due respect, Masset's fastball pretty much sat at 94 when he started. With that he has a plus curve a decent slider and a change. I think if he becomes a starter you see both his ERA and WHIP drop.
June 13, 200718 yr QUOTE(hitlesswonder @ Jun 13, 2007 -> 04:03 PM) I think Konerko's contract was the first one he messed up on. PK's contract was great on so many levels.
June 13, 200718 yr Author QUOTE(fathom @ Jun 13, 2007 -> 11:20 AM) PK's contract was great on so many levels. its one of the best really. He is also coming around now. Secondly, I still think its a very high hope to think that Gio will be up next year. He is obviously faring very well in AA, but he needs to hit AAA and play the same way before I believe he is ready. Floyd on the other hand seems to be coming around quite well in AAA.
June 13, 200718 yr QUOTE(RockRaines @ Jun 13, 2007 -> 04:22 PM) its one of the best really. He is also coming around now. I couldn't imagine how much blame KW would receive if he had let Konerko go after 2005. When a guy who was as crappy as Rowand was during 2005 is treated like a god, then I don't want to know what people would be saying about Konerko. I have so much respect for Konerko. Besides for participating in my favorite sports moment of my lifetime (slam in game 2), he CHOSE to stay with the White Sox.
June 13, 200718 yr QUOTE(fathom @ Jun 13, 2007 -> 11:01 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> If we put Gio or Floyd into the rotation, it would be a lot more interesting than seeing Contreras throw 87 mph with no command and 1/10th the forkball he used to have. Could it be that Contreras has the first big money contract that KW messed up on? Magglio's backloaded contract kinda sucked. $3.75 million in 2001, and $14 million in 2004. He wasn't worth $14 million at the time and the Sox were screwed with compensation picks because there's no way they could guarantee him 80% of $14 million.
June 13, 200718 yr QUOTE(Allsox @ Jun 13, 2007 -> 11:14 AM) I don't think Paulie's contract is that bad. Now, Contreras' and Vazquez's on the other hand will prevent this team from being competitive in '08 and they'll lose Buehrle because of them. If not for Vazquez and Contreras, the rotation in '08 would be: Buehrle (Re-signed thanks to ditching Vaz 11 and Count 9 from this offseason) Garland Danks Masset Floyd/Gonzalez Winner in Spring Training I could have lived with that rotation next yr than this projected '08 rotation: Garland Contreras (Do they have a choice really?) Vazquez (Again, no choice but to put mediocrity here) Danks Masset/Floyd/Gonzalez Winner in Spring Training The Vazquez contract is easily movable if it came to that to say his deal is going to keep this team from competing is just asinine. How is Masset being in the rotation going to help this team? Floyd or a 21 year old who's repeating AA in Gonzalez? You've got to be s***ting me. It's funny that Javy Vazquez is actually becoming underrated when Nick Masset is being labeled as the superior starting pitcher. Some of you really need to get over one start in perfect weather conditions against a bad Cubs team, he hasn't shown anything positive out of the pen. If you think Vazquez is mediocre then I can't imagine what you must think of Masset, Floyd and Gonzalez. Contreras on the other hand I agree on.
June 13, 200718 yr QUOTE(fathom @ Jun 13, 2007 -> 11:20 AM) PK's contract was great on so many levels. In this day and age, it is a bargain. QUOTE(santo=dorf @ Jun 13, 2007 -> 11:34 AM) Magglio's backloaded contract kinda sucked. $3.75 million in 2001, and $14 million in 2004. He wasn't worth $14 million at the time and the Sox were screwed with compensation picks because there's no way they could guarantee him 80% of $14 million. That's kind of misleading because that contract spanned his arbit years into what would have been his first free agent years. It was representative of the marketplace when he signed it.
June 13, 200718 yr QUOTE(Kalapse @ Jun 13, 2007 -> 11:34 AM) The Vazquez contract is easily movable if it came to that to say his deal is going to keep this team from competing is just asinine. How is Masset being in the rotation going to help this team? Floyd or a 21 year old who's repeating AA in Gonzalez? You've got to be s***ting me. It's funny that Javy Vazquez is actually becoming underrated when Nick Masset is being labeled as the superior starting pitcher. Some of you really need to get over one start in perfect weather conditions against a bad Cubs team, he hasn't shown anything positive out of the pen. If you think Vazquez is mediocre then I can't imagine what you must think of Masset, Floyd and Gonzalez. Contreras on the other hand I agree on. If Vazquez stays healthy and posts 4.5 ERAs the contract isn't that bad. And Kalapse is right I think in saying that it could moved pretty easily. The Contreras contract is a different story. I just don't get all the love for Nick Masset. It'd be great if it worked out, but his numbers right now are not good.I have a hard time believing that starting would transform him into a much better pitcher.
June 13, 200718 yr QUOTE(santo=dorf @ Jun 13, 2007 -> 09:34 AM) Magglio's backloaded contract kinda sucked. $3.75 million in 2001, and $14 million in 2004. He wasn't worth $14 million at the time and the Sox were screwed with compensation picks because there's no way they could guarantee him 80% of $14 million. The only reason that contract wound up sucking was that Magglio got hurt. If he was healthy, a $14 mil arbitration offer would have been something the Sox would have been more than happy to do, considering that the Tigers paid him $15 mil a year for 5 years that offseason.
June 13, 200718 yr QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Jun 13, 2007 -> 12:27 PM) The only reason that contract wound up sucking was that Magglio got hurt. If he was healthy, a $14 mil arbitration offer would have been something the Sox would have been more than happy to do, considering that the Tigers paid him $15 mil a year for 5 years that offseason. And that's working out quite well for them.
June 13, 200718 yr QUOTE(Steff @ Jun 13, 2007 -> 12:41 PM) And that's working out quite well for them. Its been a win-win. We got Dye at 1/3 the price and World Series title out of the deal.
June 13, 200718 yr QUOTE(RockRaines @ Jun 13, 2007 -> 05:49 PM) lets try and keep it positive in the spirit of the thread please. What's your most memorable play of 2005?
June 13, 200718 yr QUOTE(RockRaines @ Jun 13, 2007 -> 05:49 PM) lets try and keep it positive in the spirit of the thread please. The only positive I get from the White Sox nowadays is when I pop in the World Series video, which is up to 12 times in the last two weeks
June 13, 200718 yr QUOTE(fathom @ Jun 13, 2007 -> 12:52 PM) What's your most memorable play of 2005? The Rally Crede HR. That saved the season.
June 13, 200718 yr QUOTE(fathom @ Jun 13, 2007 -> 05:52 PM) What's your most memorable play of 2005? AJ's walk-off HR against the Dodgers. That confirmed to me the Sox had some baseball magic up their sleeve
June 13, 200718 yr Author QUOTE(Allsox @ Jun 13, 2007 -> 12:59 PM) AJ's walk-off HR against the Dodgers. That confirmed to me the Sox had some baseball magic up their sleeve that was awesome. I had never seen the crowd go that crazy.
June 13, 200718 yr Author f*** it. Close this thread for real. There is nothing positive coming out of this season at all. Bad fielding, baserunning miscues, cant bunt, cant pitch, cant walk, cant score runs. This team is finished. Ive never seen a more weak-willed bunch of players in my life. Oh the bad hitting is contagious huh, well then f***in snap out of it you self concious pieces of crap. Im done, this team is done and if someone doesnt get fired or traded by our next game, our GM is done too.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.