September 2, 200718 yr Baltimore is freaking pathetic. Losing 30-3 and being no hit in less than 2 weeks is impressive.
September 2, 200718 yr QUOTE(Kalapse @ Sep 1, 2007 -> 09:10 PM) Pfft. It's been done before and at a younger age. IMHO, Phillip Hughes would have done it also if he didn't get hurt.
September 2, 200718 yr QUOTE(whitesoxfan99 @ Sep 1, 2007 -> 09:11 PM) Baltimore is freaking pathetic. Losing 30-3 and being no hit in less than 2 weeks is impressive. I wonder what that would say about us considering we have a worse record.
September 2, 200718 yr ESPN IS GONNA DO AN WHOLE BASEBALL TONIGHT EPISODE DEDICATED TO CLAY BUCHHOLZ!&^*&^(*^!&^#@ ZOMG! Actually, I wouldn't put it past them.
September 2, 200718 yr This has got nowhere near the publicity of the other two no hitters this year to this point. Of course, no BBTN yet..
September 2, 200718 yr QUOTE(WhiteSoxfan1986 @ Sep 1, 2007 -> 11:17 PM) Where's our Clay Buchholz? (sorry Flash, had to say it). It has already been said.
September 2, 200718 yr QUOTE(BearSox @ Sep 1, 2007 -> 07:14 PM) Phillip Hughes > Clay Buchholz... Buchholtz curve is downright nastier than Hughes breaking ball. Hughes has a far better build though and should prove to be more durable (despite his injury earlier this season).
September 2, 200718 yr Ha. This just shows how ridiculous it was to even think the Red Sox were going to deal Buchholz... I'm not going to bother with ESPN for the next week or so, so I don't have to see anything about this.
September 4, 200718 yr QUOTE(WhiteSoxfan1986 @ Sep 1, 2007 -> 11:17 PM) Where's our Clay Buchholz? (sorry Flash, had to say it). We had him when his name was Wilson Alvarez.
September 4, 200718 yr QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Sep 2, 2007 -> 12:58 AM) It has already been said. I said it because you said it originally, so it's a playful gesture, but I'm as serious as you about it too.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.