bio

 

Jessie Rogers just broke in on 670 saying the Sox are hot after him.

Edited July 31, 200817 yr by southsider2k5

interest per Jesse Rogers

 

119.0 6 0 66 3.33 1.29 0

Good numbers on a garbage team at 23. I like it

Hard to believe after 20 starts for Nats he still has a good era and whip. 3.33 and 1.29 respectively. Hmmm.

 

Hasn't given up more than 4 in last 10 starts.

 

DATE OPP W L ERA SV IP H ER BB SO

MAY 29 @SD 0 0 3.52 0 6.0 5 2 3 5

JUN 05 STL 0 1 3.47 0 6.0 4 2 4 0

JUN 11 @PIT 0 1 3.43 0 6.0 7 2 0 3

JUN 17 @MIN 0 1 3.36 0 7.0 5 2 2 3

JUN 22 TEX 0 0 3.34 0 6.0 4 2 0 6

JUN 28 BAL 0 1 3.54 0 5.0 7 4 1 1

JUL 03 @CIN 0 0 3.60 0 6.0 5 3 3 3

JUL 09 ARI 1 0 3.40 0 6.0 2 0 3 0

JUL 19 @ATL 1 0 3.29 0 6.0 7 1 3 4

JUL 25 @LAD 0 1 3.33 0 7.0 6 3 2 3

Totals 2 5 3.10 0 61.0 52 21 21 28

 

 

Edited July 31, 200817 yr by RudyLawRules

john's tend to work out well for us.

I'd rather have Paul McKartnee.

I'd rather have Paul McKartnee.

ZING!

I'd rather have Paul McKartnee.

Hahaha. Awesome.

 

Anyone know who we'd have to give up to get him? Solid numbers on a s*** team. I like.

The Nationals have no reason to trade him, which makes me think we'd have to give up a ton.

What purpose does this serve?

 

Halladay keeps poping back into my head.

I'd rather have Paul McKartnee.

that's good stuff

The only way I see Sox trading for him is if Floyd's going elsewhere.

The only way I see Sox trading for him is if Floyd's going elsewhere.

After lastnight, I can't see them doing that.

This is kind of puzzling. Why would the Nats trade away a pitcher that is 23. Anyone want to tell me something about this guy. Ie, is he for real and are we talking about a nice long-term acquisition or are we talking about a guy thats been pitching way over his head, despite being young. You have to like the fact that he has fewer hits than innings pitched, but he has thrown a decent number of walks and doesn't get a ton of k's.

 

Is this guy going to get lit up in his transition from the NL to AL. Also, we have to be talking about a package which involves both Fields & Poreda correct (why would the Nats trade a 23 year old without getting significant pieces in return).

 

Hell looking at his minor league numbers, the guy just shot through the system.

 

2006 was his first full season and he was nothing short of mediocre, than 07 he goes from High A to the Majors. 08 he spent the entire time with the Nats.

I imagine the Sox would have to give up a lot to get him. I've never seen him pitch, but he's obviously young, cheap, and thus far at least, has done really well. Why would Washington want to trade him unless they're getting a great return?

I hate to beat that stupid drum that adds nothing, but the fact that we are hearing about this before hand leads me to believe it's a smokescreen or just over reporting.

Have been listening ot the Score and have not heard anything.

 

Although Murph thinks Theriot could hit .400

Have been listening ot the Score and have not heard anything.

 

Although Murph thinks Theriot could hit .400

 

I was just in the car for 10 minutes getting lunch and Murph talked about Lannan 3 times with Rogers

SOMETHING ODD IS GOING ON WITH THIS RADIO BIZ

This is kind of puzzling. Why would the Nats trade away a pitcher that is 23. Anyone want to tell me something about this guy. Ie, is he for real and are we talking about a nice long-term acquisition or are we talking about a guy thats been pitching way over his head, despite being young. You have to like the fact that he has fewer hits than innings pitched, but he has thrown a decent number of walks and doesn't get a ton of k's.

 

Is this guy going to get lit up in his transition from the NL to AL. Also, we have to be talking about a package which involves both Fields & Poreda correct (why would the Nats trade a 23 year old without getting significant pieces in return).

 

Hell looking at his minor league numbers, the guy just shot through the system.

 

2006 was his first full season and he was nothing short of mediocre, than 07 he goes from High A to the Majors. 08 he spent the entire time with the Nats.

 

FB (88-92), CH (~80), CB (mid 70's), and I think he added a SL this season. I believe his CH is his best pitch. He throws a two-seamer so he gets good movement. He doesn't have particularly great stuff. Danks and Floyd each have better stuff. I think right now would be a case of buying high on him.

I was just in the car for 10 minutes getting lunch and Murph talked about Lannan 3 times with Rogers

 

Sorry I ran out to get lunch and forgot I had done this while eating and typing.

 

My head hurts I gotta get some work that pays done.

 

Please disregard me.

Have been listening ot the Score and have not heard anything.

 

Although Murph thinks Theriot could hit .400

 

Then he'll be in for a rude awakening when he drops below .300 by the end of the year. Still a quality player (big fan of his, actually), but I don't think the end of this year will be pretty for him at the dish --a little over his head right now.

Then he'll be in for a rude awakening when he drops below .300 by the end of the year. Still a quality player (big fan of his, actually), but I don't think the end of this year will be pretty for him at the dish --a little over his head right now.

 

probably not, this is the NL for goodness sakes, Ryan Ludwik and SKIP schumacher are stars.

I would assume Clayton Richard would have to be traded to the Nationals as part of this deal. They would clearly want an ML ready pitcher. BUt like mentioned before, why would the Nationals trade a 23-year-old lefty, who is dealing this year?

probably not, this is the NL for goodness sakes, Ryan Ludwik and SKIP schumacher are stars.

 

Suppose that's a good point, particularly when you mention those two.

 

But that also might tell us something about Lannan's numbers, too.