Steve9347 Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 (edited) bio Jessie Rogers just broke in on 670 saying the Sox are hot after him. Edited July 31, 2008 by southsider2k5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nokona Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 interest per Jesse Rogers 119.0 6 0 66 3.33 1.29 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nokona Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 Good numbers on a garbage team at 23. I like it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RudyLawRules Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 (edited) Hard to believe after 20 starts for Nats he still has a good era and whip. 3.33 and 1.29 respectively. Hmmm. Hasn't given up more than 4 in last 10 starts. DATE OPP W L ERA SV IP H ER BB SO MAY 29 @SD 0 0 3.52 0 6.0 5 2 3 5 JUN 05 STL 0 1 3.47 0 6.0 4 2 4 0 JUN 11 @PIT 0 1 3.43 0 6.0 7 2 0 3 JUN 17 @MIN 0 1 3.36 0 7.0 5 2 2 3 JUN 22 TEX 0 0 3.34 0 6.0 4 2 0 6 JUN 28 BAL 0 1 3.54 0 5.0 7 4 1 1 JUL 03 @CIN 0 0 3.60 0 6.0 5 3 3 3 JUL 09 ARI 1 0 3.40 0 6.0 2 0 3 0 JUL 19 @ATL 1 0 3.29 0 6.0 7 1 3 4 JUL 25 @LAD 0 1 3.33 0 7.0 6 3 2 3 Totals 2 5 3.10 0 61.0 52 21 21 28 Edited July 31, 2008 by RudyLawRules Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 john's tend to work out well for us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 I'd rather have Paul McKartnee. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted July 31, 2008 Author Share Posted July 31, 2008 QUOTE (knightni @ Jul 31, 2008 -> 11:59 AM) I'd rather have Paul McKartnee. ZING! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FranktheTank35 Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 QUOTE (knightni @ Jul 31, 2008 -> 10:59 AM) I'd rather have Paul McKartnee. Hahaha. Awesome. Anyone know who we'd have to give up to get him? Solid numbers on a s*** team. I like. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 The Nationals have no reason to trade him, which makes me think we'd have to give up a ton. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Chappas Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 What purpose does this serve? Halladay keeps poping back into my head. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ginger Kid Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 QUOTE (knightni @ Jul 31, 2008 -> 09:59 AM) I'd rather have Paul McKartnee. that's good stuff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 The only way I see Sox trading for him is if Floyd's going elsewhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That funky motion Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 QUOTE (fathom @ Jul 31, 2008 -> 12:06 PM) The only way I see Sox trading for him is if Floyd's going elsewhere. After lastnight, I can't see them doing that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 This is kind of puzzling. Why would the Nats trade away a pitcher that is 23. Anyone want to tell me something about this guy. Ie, is he for real and are we talking about a nice long-term acquisition or are we talking about a guy thats been pitching way over his head, despite being young. You have to like the fact that he has fewer hits than innings pitched, but he has thrown a decent number of walks and doesn't get a ton of k's. Is this guy going to get lit up in his transition from the NL to AL. Also, we have to be talking about a package which involves both Fields & Poreda correct (why would the Nats trade a 23 year old without getting significant pieces in return). Hell looking at his minor league numbers, the guy just shot through the system. 2006 was his first full season and he was nothing short of mediocre, than 07 he goes from High A to the Majors. 08 he spent the entire time with the Nats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bighurt574 Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 I imagine the Sox would have to give up a lot to get him. I've never seen him pitch, but he's obviously young, cheap, and thus far at least, has done really well. Why would Washington want to trade him unless they're getting a great return? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 I hate to beat that stupid drum that adds nothing, but the fact that we are hearing about this before hand leads me to believe it's a smokescreen or just over reporting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Chappas Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 Have been listening ot the Score and have not heard anything. Although Murph thinks Theriot could hit .400 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 QUOTE (Jenks Heat @ Jul 31, 2008 -> 11:45 AM) Have been listening ot the Score and have not heard anything. Although Murph thinks Theriot could hit .400 I was just in the car for 10 minutes getting lunch and Murph talked about Lannan 3 times with Rogers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 SOMETHING ODD IS GOING ON WITH THIS RADIO BIZ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sircaffey Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Jul 31, 2008 -> 11:35 AM) This is kind of puzzling. Why would the Nats trade away a pitcher that is 23. Anyone want to tell me something about this guy. Ie, is he for real and are we talking about a nice long-term acquisition or are we talking about a guy thats been pitching way over his head, despite being young. You have to like the fact that he has fewer hits than innings pitched, but he has thrown a decent number of walks and doesn't get a ton of k's. Is this guy going to get lit up in his transition from the NL to AL. Also, we have to be talking about a package which involves both Fields & Poreda correct (why would the Nats trade a 23 year old without getting significant pieces in return). Hell looking at his minor league numbers, the guy just shot through the system. 2006 was his first full season and he was nothing short of mediocre, than 07 he goes from High A to the Majors. 08 he spent the entire time with the Nats. FB (88-92), CH (~80), CB (mid 70's), and I think he added a SL this season. I believe his CH is his best pitch. He throws a two-seamer so he gets good movement. He doesn't have particularly great stuff. Danks and Floyd each have better stuff. I think right now would be a case of buying high on him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Chappas Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 QUOTE (kyyle23 @ Jul 31, 2008 -> 12:46 PM) I was just in the car for 10 minutes getting lunch and Murph talked about Lannan 3 times with Rogers Sorry I ran out to get lunch and forgot I had done this while eating and typing. My head hurts I gotta get some work that pays done. Please disregard me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Friend of Nordhagen Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 QUOTE (Jenks Heat @ Jul 31, 2008 -> 12:45 PM) Have been listening ot the Score and have not heard anything. Although Murph thinks Theriot could hit .400 Then he'll be in for a rude awakening when he drops below .300 by the end of the year. Still a quality player (big fan of his, actually), but I don't think the end of this year will be pretty for him at the dish --a little over his head right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 QUOTE (Friend of Nordhagen @ Jul 31, 2008 -> 06:56 PM) Then he'll be in for a rude awakening when he drops below .300 by the end of the year. Still a quality player (big fan of his, actually), but I don't think the end of this year will be pretty for him at the dish --a little over his head right now. probably not, this is the NL for goodness sakes, Ryan Ludwik and SKIP schumacher are stars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maggsmaggs Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 I would assume Clayton Richard would have to be traded to the Nationals as part of this deal. They would clearly want an ML ready pitcher. BUt like mentioned before, why would the Nationals trade a 23-year-old lefty, who is dealing this year? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Friend of Nordhagen Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 QUOTE (bmags @ Jul 31, 2008 -> 12:59 PM) probably not, this is the NL for goodness sakes, Ryan Ludwik and SKIP schumacher are stars. Suppose that's a good point, particularly when you mention those two. But that also might tell us something about Lannan's numbers, too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.