sin city sox fan Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/teams/depth?team=chw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 QUOTE (sin city sox fan @ Dec 22, 2008 -> 03:52 PM) http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/teams/depth?team=chw It's bad, but it's just off-season compilation based on the pieces we have. I highly doubt any thought was put into this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
striker Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 They must be smoking and I'm not joking... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaTank Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 That's f***ing horrible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phiteinphils Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 Eh, I wouldn't read too much into this. It could possibly be a simple error and those things happen all the time, especially on espn.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sircaffey Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 But CF is the easiest of the OF positions to play... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 That lineup is still more likely than Ozzie treating Anderson as a starter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Dec 22, 2008 -> 04:29 PM) That lineup is still more likely than Ozzie treating Anderson as a starter. To be honest, what has BA done to be treated like a starter? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 QUOTE (RockRaines @ Dec 22, 2008 -> 04:35 PM) To be honest, what has BA done to be treated like a starter? He hasn't been given a chance yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 Oh not this again... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whtsoxfan Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 QUOTE (philadelphia sox fan @ Dec 22, 2008 -> 04:21 PM) Eh, I wouldn't read too much into this. It could possibly be a simple error and those things happen all the time, especially on espn.com   No more worse than some of the dribble I've read from a collective wishful posters on here... in other words, some assume that we would be able to unload our "garbage" and receive "cream of the crop" players in return.  besides, ESPN is so EAST coast biased that their "logic" never ceases to amaze me! In fact, if they had their twisted way, I'm sure they write a story about how wonderful it would have been had the Packers beat us tonight and faced Favre in the Super Bowl.  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaTank Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 QUOTE (whtsoxfan @ Dec 22, 2008 -> 04:52 PM) No more worse than some of the dribble I've read from a collective wishful posters on here... in other words, some assume that we would be able to unload our "garbage" and receive "cream of the crop" players in return. besides, ESPN is so EAST coast biased that their "logic" never ceases to amaze me! In fact, if they had their twisted way, I'm sure they write a story about how wonderful it would have been had the Packers beat us tonight and faced Favre in the Super Bowl.  We're not Cubs fans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elrockinMT Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 QUOTE (lostfan @ Dec 22, 2008 -> 10:46 PM) Oh not this again... Â Â I agree. Let's drop this line please. Getting abck to ESPN look at the fact they have Josh Fields in LF? Is this a 2007 line up or something? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 QUOTE (elrockinMT @ Dec 22, 2008 -> 06:39 PM) I agree. Let's drop this line please. Getting abck to ESPN look at the fact they have Josh Fields in LF? Is this a 2007 line up or something? I think they're just throwing names out there, nobody knows. It's just laziness really. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MO2005 Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Dec 22, 2008 -> 04:39 PM) He hasn't been given a chance yet. Â Yeah he has! What happened in 2006? Didn't he barely hit over .200? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 Seriously, another Brian Anderson sucks no he doesn't argument? Really? Are you guys this bored? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MO2005 Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 On paper this team is projected to lose 100 games, honestly. I think everyone can agree that if the Sox make no more moves, then that'll probably happen. I still believe that there are some bargains on the free agent market the Sox could get. Wily Taveras is still one guy that'll help this team as a role player. I now have this feeling that Konerko may go to the Angels. They have wanted him since 2005.. It's all kind of weird the Angels pulled out and maybe have something up their sleeves for Konerko. Figgins or Kendrick would be a great addition! Yes that leaves a whole at first, but I'd rather add a couple proven young guys than unproven. Salary they still are cheap...We could always go with Dye or Fields at first. Didn't Josh play a little first back in the day or am I losing my mind? Â This team has to do something because that depth chart looks like poop. I mean seriously KC looks better than us right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonard Zelig Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 No, they were not smoking crack, it was Michael Irvin's brother's stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 QUOTE (lostfan @ Dec 22, 2008 -> 05:50 PM) Seriously, another Brian Anderson sucks no he doesn't argument? Really? Are you guys this bored? Where was that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFanForever Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 I'd rather have the outfield they listed there than one that would include Speedy Owens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 QUOTE (RockRaines @ Dec 22, 2008 -> 07:08 PM) Where was that? The beginning of those arguments looks the same every time. It's pretty funny actually. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayitaintso Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 QUOTE (MO2005 @ Dec 22, 2008 -> 05:47 PM) Yeah he has! What happened in 2006? Didn't he barely hit over .200? you know green is sarcasam right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 QUOTE (SoxFanForever @ Dec 22, 2008 -> 07:11 PM) I'd rather have the outfield they listed there than one that would include Speedy Owens. As the lineup is currently constructed the lineup would almost certainly be Quentin-Owens-Dye despite the adamant protests of Soxtalk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 QUOTE (whtsoxfan @ Dec 22, 2008 -> 05:52 PM) No more worse than some of the dribble I've read  Was there basketball involved?  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmywins1 Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 QUOTE (lostfan @ Dec 22, 2008 -> 07:40 PM) As the lineup is currently constructed the lineup would almost certainly be Quentin-Owens-Dye despite the adamant protests of Soxtalk. Man, I really hope we get a lead off hitter, I don't think I could stand any more of Jerry Owens(is there anyone with an uglier swing?). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.