October 28, 200916 yr http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=4601465 Also noticed at the bottom it said the Dodge have the most potential FAs with 16. Why on earth would you appoint your wife as an executive in the first place. Did McCourt get his money from her? What a mess this is gonna turn out to be?
October 28, 200916 yr QUOTE (Wanne @ Oct 28, 2009 -> 12:10 PM) http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=4601465 Also noticed at the bottom it said the Dodge have the most potential FAs with 16. Why on earth would you appoint your wife as an executive in the first place. Did McCourt get his money from her? What a mess this is gonna turn out to be? The eye-popper: She wants $321,000 a month in spousal support if reinstated to her former position. If not, she believes she should be paid nearly $488,000 per month. Seriously?!?!
October 28, 200916 yr thats just a small part of her demands, NSS. Check this out travel by private jet - 5 star hotel accommodations - travel expenses - Unlimited - business dinners 5 nights per week - business lunches 5 days per week - making Dodger Legends available for events without charge - access to team doctors for McCourt family members - access to the owner’s suite for Dodger home games and non-baseball events at the stadium - Tickets to All-Star games and playoff games — even if the Dodgers aren’t playing - a pass to all National League games
October 28, 200916 yr As Chris Rock says.. "I'm not saying he should've killer her, but I understand."
October 28, 200916 yr QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Oct 28, 2009 -> 01:45 PM) sounds like Rachel Phelps This guy here is dead!
October 28, 200916 yr QUOTE (bschmaranz @ Oct 28, 2009 -> 01:46 PM) This guy here is dead! Cross him off, then!
October 28, 200916 yr I tried to think of something I could say here without catching a 3 day vacation from this lovely message board about Ms. McCourt. Here's what I got... women be trippin'.
October 29, 200916 yr QUOTE (JorgeFabregas @ Oct 28, 2009 -> 02:50 PM) Whose to say those perks weren't contractually included in the gig? I'm pretty sure the marriage gig didn't contractually obligate $331-$448k per MONTH for the rest of her life.
October 29, 200916 yr QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Oct 29, 2009 -> 04:04 PM) I'm pretty sure the marriage gig didn't contractually obligate $331-$448k per MONTH for the rest of her life. Depending on how long they have been married, and how much money they have made together, not to mention if there is a pre-nup, it might. If nothing precludes it, she is entitled to keep living her lifestyle in a lot of states.
October 29, 200916 yr QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Oct 29, 2009 -> 04:04 PM) I'm pretty sure the marriage gig didn't contractually obligate $331-$448k per MONTH for the rest of her life. Not unreasonable based on prior earnings, etc. As SS mentioned, she is entitled to maintain her current lifestyle. Basically the laws are written so that no human is held economically captive by another.
October 30, 200916 yr QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Oct 29, 2009 -> 04:04 PM) I'm pretty sure the marriage gig didn't contractually obligate $331-$448k per MONTH for the rest of her life. I am specifically referring to the baseball and travel-related perks possibly being part of the CEO gig.
October 30, 200916 yr I'm pretty sure the saying is "Don't s*** where you eat," but that just might be how I've heard it.
October 30, 200916 yr QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Oct 30, 2009 -> 01:41 PM) I'm pretty sure the saying is "Don't s*** where you eat," but that just might be how I've heard it. Yep, that's the saying as I understand it too.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.