July 29, 201015 yr And no, I'm not talking about striking out the side, although I certainly wouldn't complain if you did that from here on out. But the agression in which you pitched with yesterday should be done everyday from here on out. You clearly still have the stuff and velocity, but instead of focusing on your best stuff, you work more as if you were a starting pitcher trying to utilize multiple pitches and being pretty. It don't have to be pretty, you are a power closer. Utilize that nasty hook and power fastball. You really don't need to out-think hitters, they can't touch you when you are throwing those two pitches with even mediocre command. Last night was vintage Jenks. It reminded me of 2005. He was upper 90's on velocity and than just snapped some lethal curves.
July 29, 201015 yr QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Jul 29, 2010 -> 10:38 AM) And no, I'm not talking about striking out the side, although I certainly wouldn't complain if you did that from here on out. But the agression in which you pitched with yesterday should be done everyday from here on out. You clearly still have the stuff and velocity, but instead of focusing on your best stuff, you work more as if you were a starting pitcher trying to utilize multiple pitches and being pretty. It don't have to be pretty, you are a power closer. Utilize that nasty hook and power fastball. You really don't need to out-think hitters, they can't touch you when you are throwing those two pitches with even mediocre command. Last night was vintage Jenks. It reminded me of 2005. He was upper 90's on velocity and than just snapped some lethal curves. He won't keep throwing in the upper 90s. The thing with Bobby is that when he gets little rest or isn't really pissed and pitching for his job, he's not going to throw 99. There's days where he throws 92-93 and that's when he gets hit hard. I think he realized that he needed more pitches due to this and his inability to be consistent with velocity may have something to do with his health and fitness (endurance does have a lot to do with your body weight...). Edited July 29, 201015 yr by chw42
July 29, 201015 yr QUOTE (chw42 @ Jul 29, 2010 -> 10:47 AM) He won't keep throwing in the upper 90s. The thing with Bobby is that when he gets little rest or isn't really pissed and pitching for his job, he's not going to throw 99. There's days where he throws 92-93 and that's when he gets hit hard. I think he realized that he needed more pitches due to this and his inability to be consistent with velocity may have something to do with his health and fitness (endurance does have a lot to do with your body weight...). Im pretty sure Bobby is worried about his future, because he knows the Sox wont pay$10 mill a year for him. Hes trying to stay healthy by not throwing 99 mph every time, or throwing his curve which apparently is really stressful on his arm. He was trying to be like Charlie Sheen in Major League 2, learn some less stressful pitches to keep the longevity of his career going. Thats all fine and dandy, but if your results diminish it wont matter how healthy you are.
July 29, 201015 yr QUOTE (bigruss22 @ Jul 29, 2010 -> 10:51 AM) Im pretty sure Bobby is worried about his future, because he knows the Sox wont pay$10 mill a year for him. Hes trying to stay healthy by not throwing 99 mph every time, or throwing his curve which apparently is really stressful on his arm. He was trying to be like Charlie Sheen in Major League 2, learn some less stressful pitches to keep the longevity of his career going. Thats all fine and dandy, but if your results diminish it wont matter how healthy you are. This is a perfect analogy of what Jenks has been doing. Jenks was awesome last night. When he had the last hitter at two strikes, I said to my wife, "He's gotta throw the hook." And he did, and that hook was like watching a video of 2005.
July 29, 201015 yr QUOTE (pittshoganerkoff @ Jul 29, 2010 -> 09:13 AM) This is a perfect analogy of what Jenks has been doing. Jenks was awesome last night. When he had the last hitter at two strikes, I said to my wife, "He's gotta throw the hook." And he did, and that hook was like watching a video of 2005. Sept. 2nd 2006 was the last time Jenks had a 1-2-3 inning with 3 K's.
July 29, 201015 yr Or maybe he told Cooper to get lost I am throwing hard. Jason he appeared to be throwing more a of a slider and not the big curve but I could be wrong. he had something nice that was moving at around 92 Whatever the case if that Bobby shows up nightly and Putz has his stuff......ouch I would still like to know his day/night splits
July 29, 201015 yr QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Jul 29, 2010 -> 03:38 PM) And no, I'm not talking about striking out the side, although I certainly wouldn't complain if you did that from here on out. But the agression in which you pitched with yesterday should be done everyday from here on out. You clearly still have the stuff and velocity, but instead of focusing on your best stuff, you work more as if you were a starting pitcher trying to utilize multiple pitches and being pretty. It don't have to be pretty, you are a power closer. Utilize that nasty hook and power fastball. You really don't need to out-think hitters, they can't touch you when you are throwing those two pitches with even mediocre command. Last night was vintage Jenks. It reminded me of 2005. He was upper 90's on velocity and than just snapped some lethal curves. Great post. A 99 MPH fastball and a breaking pitch can be hard to beat Edited July 29, 201015 yr by elrockinMT
July 29, 201015 yr QUOTE (elrockinMT @ Jul 29, 2010 -> 12:51 PM) Great post. A 99 MPH fastball and a breaking pitch can be hard to beat If he can do that consistently throughout the rest of the year, it will be absolutely amazing for the Sox. Buerhle struggled through 5 last night, then the bullpen comes in and throws 4 stellar innings, just a joy to watch, especially Putz.
July 29, 201015 yr QUOTE (Jenks Heat @ Jul 29, 2010 -> 01:43 PM) Jason he appeared to be throwing more a of a slider and not the big curve but I could be wrong. he had something nice that was moving at around 92 The last pitch he snapped off to strike out Smoak was at 87.
July 29, 201015 yr Putz is flat out ridiculous. And he knows it, he just has that "I WILL beat you" look on his face at all times
July 29, 201015 yr QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Jul 29, 2010 -> 12:59 PM) Putz is flat out ridiculous. And he knows it, he just has that "I WILL beat you" look on his face at all times That splitfinger is just plain nasty.
July 29, 201015 yr Putz 27, Thornton 17, Threets 7, Santos 6, Jenks 2 = 59 scoreless appearances currently going.
July 29, 201015 yr QUOTE (CaliSoxFanViaSWside @ Jul 29, 2010 -> 01:22 PM) Putz 27, Thornton 17, Threets 7, Santos 6, Jenks 2 = 59 scoreless appearances currently going. OUR BULLPEN IS WHO WE THOUGHT IT WAS!!!
July 29, 201015 yr QUOTE (CaliSoxFanViaSWside @ Jul 29, 2010 -> 01:22 PM) Putz 27, Thornton 17, Threets 7, Santos 6, Jenks 2 = 59 scoreless appearances currently going. Threets has thrown 7 innings since the game vs the Athletics where he threw the ball away and Coco Crisp scored from first?
July 29, 201015 yr QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Jul 29, 2010 -> 02:20 PM) Threets has thrown 7 innings since the game vs the Athletics where he threw the ball away and Coco Crisp scored from first? He did say appearances, still dont know if that is true though.
July 29, 201015 yr QUOTE (bigruss22 @ Jul 29, 2010 -> 02:34 PM) He did say appearances, still dont know if that is true though. There is no way Threets has made 7 appearances since that game either, that was Sunday or Saturday. I think that number is wrong
July 29, 201015 yr QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Jul 29, 2010 -> 03:37 PM) There is no way Threets has made 7 appearances since that game either, that was Sunday or Saturday. I think that number is wrong Earned runs
July 29, 201015 yr QUOTE (ChiSox_Sonix @ Jul 29, 2010 -> 02:38 PM) Earned runs QUOTE (CaliSoxFanViaSWside @ Jul 29, 2010 -> 01:22 PM) Putz 27, Thornton 17, Threets 7, Santos 6, Jenks 2 = 59 scoreless appearances currently going. scoreless appearances only is for earned runs? I thought it was whether a run was scored, earned or not
July 29, 201015 yr QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Jul 29, 2010 -> 03:40 PM) scoreless appearances only is for earned runs? I thought it was whether a run was scored, earned or not I think you're right also.
July 29, 201015 yr QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Jul 29, 2010 -> 03:40 PM) scoreless appearances only is for earned runs? I thought it was whether a run was scored, earned or not I dunno, it works if you only consider earned runs. I was just looking at Threets game log out of curiousity and happened to notice. Didn't really pay much attention to the original post
July 29, 201015 yr Putz 27, Thornton 17, Threets 7, Santos 6, Jenks 2 = 59 scoreless appearances currently going.[/quote But what about Linebrink? Edited July 29, 201015 yr by balfanman
July 29, 201015 yr Im pretty sure Bobby is worried about his future, because he knows the Sox wont pay$10 mill a year for him. Hes trying to stay healthy by not throwing 99 mph every time, or throwing his curve which apparently is really stressful on his arm. He was trying to be like Charlie Sheen in Major League 2, learn some less stressful pitches to keep the longevity of his career going. Thats all fine and dandy, but if your results diminish it wont matter how healthy you are. How do you know this stuff? I think the stay healthy stuff is a bunch of b.s. I just don't know how people come up with some of this stuff. When a pitcher or anybody tries to stay healthy, that's when they immediately get hurt. I think Bobby has been a pretty good closer for a long time now, though you don't need to remind me people that you disagree. I am well aware of your disagreement with me on Jenks. I get it. I just strongly disagree with this stuff about him wanting to "stay healthy." He's kinda fat to be worried about that. Edited July 29, 201015 yr by greg775
July 29, 201015 yr QUOTE (greg775 @ Jul 29, 2010 -> 04:23 PM) How do you know this stuff? I think the stay healthy stuff is a bunch of b.s. I just don't know how people come up with some of this stuff. When a pitcher or anybody tries to stay healthy, that's when they immediately get hurt. I think Bobby has been a pretty good closer for a long time now, though you don't need to remind me people that you disagree. I am well aware of your disagreement with me on Jenks. I get it. I just strongly disagree with this stuff about him wanting to "stay healthy." He's kinda fat to be worried about that. Pretty sure he's all but been quoted on it to be honest Greg.
July 29, 201015 yr Wow, if he's been quoted on it, then I apologize. If he's been quoted on the fact he's trying to stay healthy, that shocks me. He may be a headcase if he's saying that stuff. I always thought if you try to stay healthy by doing stuff like that, that's when you really get hurt.
July 29, 201015 yr QUOTE (greg775 @ Jul 29, 2010 -> 04:32 PM) Wow, if he's been quoted on it, then I apologize. If he's been quoted on the fact he's trying to stay healthy, that shocks me. He may be a headcase if he's saying that stuff. I always thought if you try to stay healthy by doing stuff like that, that's when you really get hurt. I might be wrong, but I could have sworn someone posted something one time this year from Jenks commenting along the lines of the curve ball putting stress on his arm and he is worried due to his contract situation. Or something like that.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.