Kyyle23 Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Jul 3, 2013 -> 12:48 AM) The Cubs were pantsed? Lee hasn't hit the majors yet, but none of the other pieces have done a whole lot. Garza has been pretty good. That trade is pretty dependent upon Archer and Lee panning out. Garza has been injured for a good portion of his time with the Cubs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulstar Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 I don't see how you can't think this trade is a win for the cubs. They got two good arms for Scott Feldman. The Cubs won't be missing Feldman at all 3 years from now, but the Orioles might be missing Arrieta in 3 years as he still has the potential to become a nasty starting pitcher (his stuff has never been the problem, it has been throwing strikes and learning how to pitch that has caused his lack of success). I don't blame the Orioles for trading Arrieta at all though, it was one of the situations where a change of scenery was definitely needed. Jake Arrieta could be to the Cubs what Chris Davis has been to the Orioles, a reclamation project turned to all-star. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Jul 3, 2013 -> 08:31 AM) Garza has been injured for a good portion of his time with the Cubs Still better than what the Rays have gotten from that deal to this point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 QUOTE (Paulstar @ Jul 3, 2013 -> 08:36 AM) I don't see how you can't think this trade is a win for the cubs. They got two good arms for Scott Feldman. The Cubs won't be missing Feldman at all 3 years from now, but the Orioles might be missing Arrieta in 3 years as he still has the potential to become a nasty starting pitcher (his stuff has never been the problem, it has been throwing strikes and learning how to pitch that has caused his lack of success). I don't blame the Orioles for trading Arrieta at all though, it was one of the situations where a change of scenery was definitely needed. Jake Arrieta could be to the Cubs what Chris Davis has been to the Orioles, a reclamation project turned to all-star. Or he could continue to be hot garbage and be out of baseball by 2015. Feldman was just a rental, so getting a lottery ticket out of it is great, and it will never be a bad trade for the Cubs. But it could easily just ended up being a footnote that is quickly forgotten. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 QUOTE (fathom @ Jul 2, 2013 -> 08:47 PM) I think it was you that mentioned this in the other thread, but thankfully the new spending rules are in place for the draft/Intl' signings. If not, the Cubs would have definitely been a top spender. Still...nothing prevents you from dropping 20M this year, take your penalty next year, and then doing it all over again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Chappas Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 (edited) QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Jul 3, 2013 -> 08:38 AM) Still better than what the Rays have gotten from that deal to this point. They are 21 and 23 years old and are the Rays number 2 and 3 rated prospects. Also saved the Rays some money which is what they needed. You think that trade will help the cubs when they need talent in two years? The rays have not missed Garza and have two highly rated prospects to boot. The cubs are almost 50 games under .500 with Garza. Edited July 3, 2013 by Harry Chappas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 QUOTE (Harry Chappas @ Jul 3, 2013 -> 10:29 AM) They are 21 and 23 years old and are the Rays number 2 and 3 rated prospects. Also saved the Rays some money which is what they needed. You think that trade will help the cubs when they need talent in two years? The rays have not missed Garza and have two highly rated prospects to boot. The cubs are almost 50 games under .500 with Garza. And I still don't think they pantsed the Cubs. Getting pantsed is like the Erik Bedard to Seattle trade, or the Pierzynski to San Francisco trade. They may also be 50 games under .500 with Garza, but, #1, how much of that is from losing 101 games last year, and #2, how much did Garza contribute to the offense scoring the 3rd fewest runs in the NL last year? I feel like I've had this conversation before. I won't say it was the Cubs best use of resources, but considering the value, I still see nothing wrong with it. Lee has not put up very good numbers in the Rays' system, though he's apparently a super defender. I remember hearing similar things about Chin-lung Hu too. And Archer is merely a reliever at this point, and not nearly as cool as his super agent brother. I'm not faulting Tampa for making the trade either, because it was something they really had to do. You can argue value any way you'd like, but saying the Cubs got pantsed, as in taken to the house...that's just wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 QUOTE (Harry Chappas @ Jul 3, 2013 -> 10:29 AM) They are 21 and 23 years old and are the Rays number 2 and 3 rated prospects. Also saved the Rays some money which is what they needed. You think that trade will help the cubs when they need talent in two years? The rays have not missed Garza and have two highly rated prospects to boot. The cubs are almost 50 games under .500 with Garza. True. It wasn't Theo and Jed that traded for Garza in the 1st place though. That trade is not on them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.