February 11, 201511 yr Author QUOTE (raBBit @ Feb 11, 2015 -> 04:39 PM) http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?...d%20Schoenfield QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Feb 11, 2015 -> 04:42 PM) I wish that was not written by a 26 year old phillie fan with a 3rd grade education Either way, they went 102-60 that year.
February 12, 201511 yr QUOTE (WhiteSoxLifer @ Feb 11, 2015 -> 03:01 PM) White sox got ranked 23 yet the cubs 13. Don't see it. http://espn.go.com/blog/sweetspot/post/_/i...18-through-13-2 So basically he says the Sox will only be 4 games better than last season even with no unforeseen injuries. Hmm.
February 12, 201511 yr QUOTE (asindc @ Feb 11, 2015 -> 07:33 PM) So basically he says the Sox will only be 4 games better than last season even with no unforeseen injuries. Hmm. He kinda refers to injuries as a part of it when he adds in the phrases "Healthy chris sale" and "lack of depth".
February 12, 201511 yr QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Feb 11, 2015 -> 07:37 PM) He kinda refers to injuries as a part of it when he adds in the phrases "Healthy chris sale" and "lack of depth". Isn't assuming a player will remain healthy a normal part of the equation unless he is starting the season with an injury or coming off an injury from the previous season? The article is yet another example of what media outlets are beginning to establish as their season-long narrative when it comes to the Sox: which Chicago team will be better. We should all agree to warn each other against clicking on these types of articles when possible. I'm only half joking.
February 12, 201511 yr When a writer decides he's going to go for clicks based on offbeat guesses the best you can do is save the article and see if he will be accountable when it's wrong.
February 13, 201511 yr QUOTE (fathom @ Feb 13, 2015 -> 02:54 PM) He ended up ranking Cleveland 4th, the highest in the AL. Because their manager makes wins and stuff!!
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.