southsider2k5 Posted January 25, 2016 Share Posted January 25, 2016 Dan @lot_49 @BenBadler Is Tim Anderson a top 25 guy, in your opinion? Ben Badler @BenBadler 35m35 minutes ago He'll be Top 100, but too many risk factors to put him in that group. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted January 25, 2016 Share Posted January 25, 2016 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jan 25, 2016 -> 12:31 PM) Dan @lot_49 @BenBadler Is Tim Anderson a top 25 guy, in your opinion? Ben Badler @BenBadler 35m35 minutes ago He'll be Top 100, but too many risk factors to put him in that group. Yeah he's not 25. Should be top 50 for sure though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Jan 25, 2016 -> 12:59 PM) Yeah he's not 25. Should be top 50 for sure though Yeah, I kind of figured he would be between #40-#60 on most publications. Hoping Fulmer is top 30. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 QUOTE (Chilihead90 @ Jan 26, 2016 -> 02:31 AM) Yeah, I kind of figured he would be between #40-#60 on most publications. Hoping Fulmer is top 30. Fulmer didn't make top 101 for BP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 QUOTE (fathom @ Jan 25, 2016 -> 07:37 PM) Fulmer didn't make top 101 for BP That's laughable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Jan 25, 2016 -> 07:54 PM) That's laughable. Many see his ceiling as a reliever, so he won't be ranked very high. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 QUOTE (ptatc @ Jan 25, 2016 -> 08:03 PM) Many see his ceiling as a reliever, so he won't be ranked very high. Was Montas ranked high on BP? I think a lot more view him more as a reliever than Fulmer. What about Tyler Jay? He barely even started in college. Fulmer has proven a lot more in college than a lot of these top 100 prospects. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 QUOTE (fathom @ Jan 25, 2016 -> 07:37 PM) Fulmer didn't make top 101 for BP For some reason I was thinking Fulmer was #1 on everyone's White Sox list. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Jan 25, 2016 -> 08:11 PM) Was Montas ranked high on BP? I think a lot more view him more as a reliever than Fulmer. What about Tyler Jay? He barely even started in college. Fulmer has proven a lot more in college than a lot of these top 100 prospects. I'm not disagreeing just giving you a reason why he isn't higher in the rankings. His high effort delivery doesn't bode well for being a starter in the MLB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 QUOTE (ptatc @ Jan 25, 2016 -> 08:03 PM) Many see his ceiling as a reliever, so he won't be ranked very high. I haven't seen anyone say that. What I've seen is that people think he'll be a reliever due to his high effort, almost violent delivery. Stuff-wise, most seem to agree that a very good late inning reliever is his probable floor. QUOTE (Chilihead90 @ Jan 26, 2016 -> 01:51 AM) For some reason I was thinking Fulmer was #1 on everyone's White Sox list. Mostly it is Anderson, though in a close race with Fulmer. Our vote was super-close, I know BA wrestled with the decision too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 QUOTE (Chilihead90 @ Jan 26, 2016 -> 07:51 AM) For some reason I was thinking Fulmer was #1 on everyone's White Sox list. BP is severely overrating Anderson and underrating Fulmer, IMO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 QUOTE (fathom @ Jan 26, 2016 -> 08:01 AM) BP is severely overrating Anderson and underrating Fulmer, IMO BP has consistently been much higher on Anderson than other publications. Started with Jason Parks, who is now a scouting supervisor with the Cubs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
royoung Posted January 26, 2016 Author Share Posted January 26, 2016 Fulmer not being in the top 101 is a joke unless you are convinced his delivery will lead to debilitating injuries. As NorthSide said, his floor is a great closer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Jan 26, 2016 -> 08:00 AM) I haven't seen anyone say that. What I've seen is that people think he'll be a reliever due to his high effort, almost violent delivery. Stuff-wise, most seem to agree that a very good late inning reliever is his probable floor. That's a better way to put it. Many believe he will be a reliever so he won't be high on the list. It will all depend on how deep into games he can go while maintaining his stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.