Or it isn't. As I've said, it's a strange, in-between number that wouldn't satisfy either party.
I'm certainly not picking on you. I could see Robert shitting the bed the rest of the season and taking 2/20 with a player opt out after the 1st year, or 4/40 with opt outs after the first 3 years. Jeez, Bergman has what, 3/120? And he has an opt out to retry the market, because he's betting on himself, and he might just do better.
The reason being that if Robert doesn't think he can be a guy who commands 10/300 +, then he probably isn't, and they can get that cheaper on year-to-year deals.