SoxBlanco
Members-
Posts
3,136 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by SoxBlanco
-
He didn't shoot him down, but he did say he doesn't think it'll be him...
-
True, but he did shoot down the Hinch/TLR tandem, as seen below. Maybe he's not shooting down La Russa because they are actually meeting with him (for whatever reason), and he's not going to shoot somebody down who is actually being interviewed.
-
Yeah, if you read Stone's tweets, it's pretty obvious Hinch is the guy. Everybody is guessing names, and he is saying "no" to all of them except Hinch. Then when somebody mentions two names, Stone always shoots down the non-Hinch name, like this...
-
AJ Hinch: does it matter to you that he cheated?
SoxBlanco replied to Kyyle23's topic in Pale Hose Talk
Here's Stone's take on Hinch being a cheater. And I tend to agree. It doesn't bother me. I would love to hire him. -
That’s ok. Improper ellipses use doesn’t show a lack of integrity. But had it been improper use of a question mark? Forget about it. Instant ban. No integrity whatsoever.
-
You're right. It could really go either way. The way I see it is that anybody could be off, including Dunning. It's a crapshoot...so the best option is to just go inning by inning and pitch the best possible option in that particular inning. If all that mattered was getting through the first inning scoreless, who do you pitch? Whatever the answer is, that's who you go with. I'd rather have Foster than Dunning. But like you said, it's a coin flip. I wouldn't want to be the one making the decision.
-
After sleeping on it, I think I would actually start one of the bullpen guys and go inning by inning. Sure, you run the risk of running out of quality guys, but you then still have Dunning if necessary. I’d rather choose an option where there’s a chance we get through a game with our six best bullpen pieces and Dunning is there as an emergency to pitch 3 or 4 innings than choose an option where you start Dunning just because it’s possible something could go wrong. If you’re Oakland right now, what are you hoping we do? I think they are hoping we start Dunning and they can get to him early.
-
If Dunning starts, I think the biggest question mark is when to pull him. We can all say that a "quick hook" is needed, but what exactly does that mean? If he gives up a run? If two guys get on base in an inning? Let's say he pitches a scoreless first inning, giving up one single. Then to start the second inning, he gets an out and then walks a guy. Then the next guy lines out, and the guy after that singles. 2 on, 2 out. Are you pulling him there? RR is going to have a tough decision, unless he's lights out. The only guarantee is that people will complain about the decision based on the outcome.
-
I've thought about this idea too, but it's tough when you don't know how Dunning will respond to coming in relief. I know he did it in college, but to be a starter this year and then be asked to enter in the 2nd or 3rd inning could be tough. I think I would start Dunning and let him go once through the lineup. Then you use the pen to cover 6 innings or so.
-
Bump. Idiot!
-
We cant realistically expect to win a game where we are running a pitcher out there who has World Series experience and a 1.99 ERA this season because we are facing Chris Bassit?
-
Did anybody actually expect EE to start tomorrow? Seems obvious that McCann will catch Lucas and Grandal will be the DH. Not sure how anybody could think EE starts over Grandal. Ricky continued to play EE in the regular season in hopes that EE would catch fire. Well he didn’t. I’m not saying he’ll be on the bench all postseason, but I certainly never expected him to play tomorrow.
-
So he'll be just like Mazara, except he'll be able to hit singles ?
-
Do we have any idea of game times yet?
-
9/27 GT: Cubs @ Sox (2:10pm)
SoxBlanco replied to Chicago White Sox's topic in 2020 Season in Review
