a judge follows the pre-sentence report, prepared by the prosecution/parole probation, 99% of the time and there are strict guiudelines for scoring the variables which a judge can rarely deviate from
Gamboa blew this all off in the beginning as being nothing - and he certainly could have filed a victim's impact statement and appeared at the court to make a statement had he wished - too late to b**** after the fact when you didn't participate in the process when you should/could have -
I have no idea what the pre-sentence report said but the prosecutiuon would have strenuoulsy objected if the judge went lower than their recommendations, so the place to look is at the prosecutors office and what sentence they determined was appropriate based on the facts of this case - which would include any (unknown to us) rehabilitation and whatever -
and as jails and prisons are filled to overcrowding and Illinois has a budget crisis - I never expected him to get any jail time -
but probation can be a rough period if the parole officer makes it so, or lax, depending again on the p.o.
all of the above is not saying whether I agree or disagree with the sentence - I am just saying how it works - the sentence was very non surprizing from that standpoint -